Bringing Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) care closer to people in The Gambia

Source: APO

In The Gambia, a visit to the clinic for HIV services is no longer just one step in a long process: clients now experience bespoke, integrated delivery of care. At the heart of this shift is differentiated service delivery, led by the Ministry of Health with support from the World Health Organization (WHO).

Around 30% of people in The Gambia who test HIV-positive do not start treatment immediately, often because services are too far, fragmented or difficult to navigate when they are needed most. Differentiated service delivery aims to remove these barriers and tailor services to meet the needs of individual health clients.

In The Gambia, around 25 000 people are living with HIV and more than two-thirds know their status. Among people diagnosed, around 70% are on antiretroviral treatment and almost 55% have achieved viral suppression.

Historically, HIV prevention and treatment in The Gambia was focused on prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV. Now, to expand testing and treatment services to more people living with HIV, services are integrated into 77 health facilities as broader entry points into care.

To expand quality of care, the Ministry of Health, in partnership with WHO and UNAIDS, conducted a three-day training for 60 health workers and lay counsellors on differentiated service delivery in May 2026.  The training focused on the service delivery model, community delivery of HIV treatment, adherence support, viral load monitoring and stigma reduction.

This has helped health facilities offer more flexible, client-centred services, including improved counselling, multi-month dispensing of HIV treatment and better use of patient data. The changes have enabled tailored care, fewer missed appointments and stronger continuity of treatment. Clinics are less congested, with smoother patient flow and reduced waiting times, creating a more supportive environment that encourages health-seeking behaviour. Flexible service hours, including weekends and extended clinics, also help clients remain in care without disrupting daily life.

“What used to require separate visits have now been integrated into routine services,” says Omar Dampha, officer in charge at Brufut Health Centre in Kombo North, West Coast Region of The Gambia. “This has made care more discreet, more convenient and easier to navigate.” He adds that clients no longer need additional trips just for treatment, reducing transport costs and helping those living far away to remain in care. “So far, we have recorded no treatment defaulters among enrolled clients,” he says.

At the health centre, differentiated service delivery was introduced in October 2025. By May 2026, 15 clients had been enrolled under the model.

According to senior nursing officer at Brufut Health Centre, Binta Jallow, the change is reflected in service delivery: “Now care is organized so that clients receive counselling and treatment on one visit,” she says, noting that this has made the process smoother and reduced repeated visits for both clients and health workers.

Health care officer at the health centre, Rohey Sarr, sees the change in how clients experience these services: “When clients feel their privacy is respected and they are treated with dignity, they are more willing to return and continue treatment,” she explains.

Between October 2025 and March 2026, more than 1000 people in The Gambia started HIV treatment through this approach. Of these, 85% were initiating treatment for the first time and the rest were mothers enrolled through PMTCT services.

“When HIV services are designed around the needs of people rather than the needs of the system, barriers to care begin to disappear,” says Dr Nathan Bakyaita, WHO Representative in The Gambia. “Differentiated service delivery is helping clients access treatment with greater dignity, convenience and continuity, ultimately improving their quality of life.”

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of World Health Organization (WHO) – The Gambia.

Media files

.

Qatar Affirms Commitment to Supporting OPCW Efforts to Enhance International Peace, Security

Source: Government of Qatar

The Hague | July 08, 2026

The State of Qatar affirmed its commitment to supporting the efforts of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) to strengthen the implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), contributing to the promotion of international peace and security.

This came in a statement delivered by HE Ambassador of the State of Qatar to the Kingdom of the Netherlands and its Permanent Representative to the OPCW, Dr. Mutlaq bin Majid Al Qahtani, during the 112th session of the OPCW Executive Council, held at the organization’s headquarters in The Hague.

His Excellency expressed Qatar’s concern over the ongoing humanitarian tragedy in the occupied Palestinian territories and the Israeli attacks on Lebanon, warning of the risks they pose to civilians and regional stability. HE reiterated the importance of seriously addressing any allegations involving the use or threat of chemical weapons and holding perpetrators accountable in accordance with international law.

His Excellency also commended the ongoing coordination between the Syrian Arab Republic and the OPCW Technical Secretariat, noting that this progress merits the restoration of Syria’s rights and privileges within the OPCW, which would contribute to regional security and strengthen the organization’s credibility.

His Excellency emphasized Qatar’s position that dialogue and the peaceful settlement of disputes remain the best way to maintain international peace and security.

HE Ambassador of the State of Qatar to the Kingdom of the Netherlands and OPCW Permanent Representative expressed Qatar’s concern regarding the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian crisis and the resulting humanitarian and security risks, highlighting the importance of strengthening international efforts to create an environment conducive to dialogue between the relevant parties, while adhering to international law and ensuring that chemical weapons are not used or threaten to be used under any pretext.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is Advancing Faster Than Governments Can Protect People, New Global Index Finds

Source: APO


.

  • AI investment is accelerating faster than governments can govern it in the public interest.
  • Governments are investing in AI skills while leaving workers’ rights behind.
  • Governments are still failing to prevent misuse and unacceptable uses of AI, like surveillance.

Second edition of the Global Index on Responsible AI compares 135 countries and finds that laws, strategies and global commitments are spreading faster than the institutions, enforcement tools and transparency mechanisms needed to protect human rights.

A new study from the Global Center on AI Governance (www.GlobalCenter.AI/) warns that the global AI governance race is leaving many regions behind, even as artificial intelligence becomes embedded in public services, workplaces, education, healthcare, policing, finance and everyday life.

By “leaving many regions behind,” the report refers to a widening gap between countries that are turning responsible AI commitments into enforceable rules and those still relying mainly on non-binding principles, strategies and voluntary frameworks. That divide matters because, without institutions, oversight bodies, transparency requirements and redress mechanisms, many governments remain poorly equipped to protect people as AI systems shape access to public services, jobs, education, healthcare, policing, finance and other areas of everyday life.

In this scenario, the second edition of the Global Index on Responsible AI (GIRAI) (http://www.Global-index.AI/) finds that responsible AI governance is expanding, but unevenly and too slowly for the pace of AI development and diffusion. While more countries are adopting AI strategies, laws and policy commitments, many still lack the institutional capacity, enforcement tools, public accountability and transparency mechanisms required to protect human rights as AI systems spread.

Built by the Global Center on AI Governance with a network of 135 regional experts, GIRAI compares national approaches across 135 countries and five human-rights-linked dimensions: AI Use in Public Service Delivery, Ethics and Sustainability, Inclusion and Diversity, Labour and Skills, and Trust and Safety. The data used for the report covers the period 1 Nov 2023 – 30 Sept 2025.

The Index exposes a widening AI governance divide between countries with enforceable rules and countries relying mainly on non-binding principles, voluntary frameworks and early-stage capacity-building efforts.

The findings are especially relevant as governments move to regulate private AI while often failing to disclose, monitor or oversee their own use of algorithmic systems. The Index finds that the weakest-performing area is AI use in public service delivery, where automated systems can affect access to welfare, healthcare, education, housing, policing, migration and other essential services.

Responsible AI cannot be secured through principles alone. The second edition of GIRAI shows a persistent gap between responsible AI as a commitment and responsible AI as a capability,” said Rachel Adams, founder and CEO at the Global Center on AI Governance. “As AI becomes a structural force in public life, governments need enforceable obligations, independent oversight, public disclosure, monitoring systems and accessible routes for redress.”

Key findings

The report identifies a global responsible AI landscape that is more active than before, but still fragmented, under-enforced and insufficiently grounded in public accountability. Among the main findings:

1. AI is accelerating faster than governments can govern it in the public interest

Diffusion of AI is expanding, with 53% of the global population having used generative AI tools. Yet average GIRAI scores remain low, at roughly 35 out of 100, and evidence of implementation exists in only 55% of cases where frameworks are active, falling to 45% in Global South countries.

2. Responsible AI governance is expanding in Global South countries, but binding protections remain scarce

Since the 1st Edition, Global South countries substantially broadened the responsible AI content of their national frameworks. On average, the number of GIRAI topics covered rose from 2.5 to 4.7, an 88% increase. In Global North countries, the number rose from 8.2 to 11.1, a 35% increase. Global South countries account for 203 of the 306 new country cases of indicators covered by frameworks identified since the 1st Edition. Despite this progress, most of the growth is in soft law: 78% of responsible AI framework cases in these countries are non-binding, compared with 42% in Global North countries.

3. AI safety is being governed as a technical problem, while human harms remain under-addressed

AI safety and security is one of the fastest-growing areas of governance, but much of it focuses on technical safeguards. Meanwhile, the Index found credible evidence of government misuse of AI in 35 of 135 countries, and only 49 countries (36%) have frameworks addressing AI-facilitated misinformation and violence.

4. Governments are regulating AI transparency but not disclosing their own use of AI

Transparency and Explainability is the strongest-performing indicator, with 58% of countries having some form of framework. Yet implementation lags behind the existence of frameworks. For government use of AI, Public Disclosure of Government Algorithmic Systems is the weakest-performing indicator, with only 18% of countries requiring disclosure of government AI systems.

5. Gender is increasingly recognised in AI governance, but protection from gendered harms remains weak

Gender equality is gaining visibility, with 29 new countries addressing gender and AI since the 1st Edition, but only 24 of 55 countries with gender-related frameworks show evidence of implementation. Protection from gendered AI harms remains limited.

6. Future generations are being prepared for the AI economy but not protected from AI-related harms

AI Literacy is one of the strongest-performing indicators, with 71 countries (53%) having some framework in place and 106 countries showing evidence of some activity in this area. By contrast, only 55 countries (41%) have frameworks addressing Children’s Rights in AI, and only 27 of them show evidence of implementation.

7. AI’s environmental footprint remains a blind spot in responsible AI governance

Only 27% of countries have frameworks addressing AI’s environmental effects, and 83% of those frameworks are non-binding. Very few governments require disclosure of AI’s energy use, water use, or environmental impact, contributing to making the environmental impact of AI a global blind spot.

8. Governments recognise the need for local-language AI but do not require developers to deliver it

Governments are investing in local-language technologies and cultural inclusion, with 52 countries (39%) showing government-led initiatives. Only 47 countries (35%) have frameworks addressing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity, and few require developers to use diverse datasets or adapt systems to local contexts.

9. Governments are investing in AI skills but neglecting workers’ rights

Labour protection frameworks exist in only 39 countries (29%), compared with 72 countries (53%) with frameworks on reskilling and upskilling. Few countries address workers’ rights to organise and collectively bargain in response to AI-driven workplace change.

10. Global AI governance is fragmenting before a shared floor of protection has been established

Average GIRAI scores range from 55 in Global North countries to 27 in Global South countries. Available evidence shows that 164 of 215 recent AI-related frameworks are non-binding, and multi-stakeholder consultations appear only 31 times in the global implementation record. Only 73 of 135 countries (54%) have adopted a national AI policy or equivalent framework, and just 36 countries (27%) have operational mechanisms for participation of civil society organisations (CSOs) in AI governance. Without a shared rights-based floor, interoperability risks serving markets before it protects people.

What GIRAI measures

The Global Index on Responsible AI is a research and advocacy initiative designed to measure countries’ commitments, capacities and progress toward rights-respecting responsible AI. It is developed by the Global Center on AI Governance, a South Africa-based think tank that works as a global hub for research and evidence-led action on inclusive and equitable AI governance.

This work was carried out with the aid of a grant from the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada and the Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office under the AI4Development funding programme. Some further funds were used for the project from the Government of Canada, and from the International Development Bank of Latin America.

The Global Center’s mission is to reduce global inequalities exacerbated by AI and to help build a world where AI technologies and governance reflect all of humanity. A central part of its work is bringing voices that are often marginalised into global AI governance debates, especially from regions and communities underrepresented in policy conversations.

GIRAI is intended to move the global AI governance debate from aspiration to evidence. It ranks countries but it also helps policymakers identify where stronger laws, institutions, resources and implementation mechanisms are needed; helps civil society actors see where governments have made commitments and where they can be held to account; and helps international organisations, funders and researchers understand where capacity gaps are most urgent.

Africa: Growing momentum, but implementation remains the greatest challenge

Africa continues to expand its responsible AI governance landscape, but the Global Index on Responsible AI finds that implementation and enforceability remain significant barriers. The region records the world’s lowest average GIRAI score (22 out of 100), 13 points below the global average, reflecting persistent gaps between policy ambition and practical action.

Out of the 39 African countries surveyed, only 6 score above the global average: Nigeria, Egypt, Kenya, Ghana, Benin and Morocco, with North Africa emerging as the continent’s strongest-performing subregion overall.

The continent’s biggest gap lies between commitments and action. Key topics related to the Ethics and Sustainability of AI have the widest policy coverage, yet only 20.45% of the existing policy frameworks are implemented. In contrast, Policy frameworks addressing Labour and Skills challenges in the context of AI record the strongest implementation rate at 65.52%, making it the only dimension in Africa to exceed the global implementation average.

Most of Africa’s governance frameworks also remain non-binding, Just 21% of the continents’ 170 documented cases of policy areas covered by frameworks throughout the 39 countries are legally enforceable, with the majority taking the form of strategies, guidance or draft policies.

The Index also finds that civil society efforts are largely focused on building awareness, strengthening capacity and fostering collaboration, while fewer initiatives concentrate on accountability and oversight. At the same time, documented cases of unacceptable-risk AI in Kenya, Ghana and Uganda highlight the urgent need to strengthen governance as AI adoption accelerates across the continent.

Ranking

World Top 10

  1. Norway
  2. Italy
  3. Ireland
  4. France
  5. Netherlands
  6. Germany
  7. United Kingdom
  8. Slovenia
  9. Latvia
  10. Estonia
  11. Brazil
  12. Spain
  13. Greece
  14. Chile
  15. Bulgaria

Regional Top 5

Region

Rank

Country

GIRAI score

Europe

1

Norway

74.66

2

Italy

72.71

3

Ireland

71.39

4

France

70.32

5

Netherlands

69.58

Latin America and the Caribbean

1

Brazil

63.3

2

Chile

61.91

3

Uruguay

56.99

4

Colombia

54.74

5

Costa Rica

52.3

Northern America

1

Canada

55.17

2

United States of America

53.34

Asia

1

Japan

55.66

2

Kyrgyz Republic

51.64

3

South Korea

47.69

4

Singapore

45.21

5

China

43.58

Africa

1

Nigeria

45.93

2

Egypt

41.26

3

Kenya

39.53

4

Ghana

38.43

5

Benin

37.01

Oceania

1

Australia

56.4

2

New Zealand

45.81

How the Index was built

The index was built by translating major global AI governance commitments, including the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI and the OECD AI Principles, into measurable, comparable indicators that can be tracked over time.

These indicators assess the three core pillars of the GIRAI: AI Policy, covering laws, regulations, policies and their implementation; Civil Society Engagement; and Enabling Conditions. The indicators are grouped across five dimensions: AI Use in Public Service Delivery, Ethics and Sustainability, Inclusion and Diversity, Labour and Skills, and Trust and Safety.

The measurement framework was validated with civil society organisations working on human rights in digital environments. Once the framework was finalised, the research team hired 135 local experts, one in each country covered by the Index, to collect evidence for all primary indicators. That process produced more than 68,000 data points, which were then analysed to identify global and regional trends grounded in local evidence.

The second edition introduces a stronger distinction between the existence of AI governance frameworks and their implementation in practice. It assesses not only whether countries have adopted laws, policies, strategies or guidelines, but whether those commitments are being operationalised through institutions, oversight mechanisms, programmes, standards, monitoring systems, budgets, consultations and other concrete actions.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Global Center on AI Governance.

Additional resources:

• Download the second edition of the Global Index on Responsible AI.

• Access country-level data and methodology at global-index.ai.

• Learn more about the Global Center on AI Governance and its work on inclusive and equitable AI governance.

• Contact us to get in touch with your local researcher.

About the Global Center on AI Governance:
The Global Center on AI Governance is a South Africa-based think tank that works as a global hub for research and evidence-led action on inclusive and equitable AI governance. Its mission is to reduce global inequalities exacerbated by AI and to help build a world where AI technologies and governance reflect all of humanity.

Through research, advocacy and global collaboration, the Center works to ensure that communities historically marginalised in global technology governance are included in the decisions shaping AI futures.

www.Globalcenter.AI

Qatar Condemns Attacks on Police and Army Personnel in Pakistan

Source: Government of Qatar

Doha | July 8, 2026

The State of Qatar strongly condemns the armed attacks on police and army personnel in Balochistan Province of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, which resulted in fatalities.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterates the State of Qatar’s unwavering position of rejecting violence, terrorism, and criminal acts, regardless of motives and reasons.

The Ministry extends the State of Qatar’s condolences to the families of the victims, as well as to the government and people of Pakistan.

Financing Africa’s Future: Global Leaders to Convene for Africa Social Impact Summit 2026

Source: APO

As Africa faces one of the defining moments in its development journey, global leaders, policymakers, investors, philanthropists, development institutions, corporate executives and innovators will gather in Lagos for the 2026 Africa Social Impact Summit (ASIS), a landmark convening focused on unlocking the partnerships and financing needed to accelerate sustainable development across the continent.

Scheduled to take place from 22–24 July 2026 at the Eko Convention Centre, Lagos, this year’s summit is themed “Financing for Development: Building Resilience and Transforming Emerging Economies.” The convening will provide a high-level platform for shaping practical solutions to Africa’s most pressing development priorities through investment, collaboration and innovation.

Co-convened by the Sterling One Foundation alongside the United Nations in Nigeria and the Federal Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning, the Africa Social Impact Summit has, since its inception, grown into one of Africa’s leading platforms for advancing market-led solutions to sustainable development challenges. The summit brings together decision-makers from government, business, development finance institutions, philanthropy, civil society and the innovation ecosystem to move beyond dialogue towards measurable action.

Africa’s development trajectory presents both immense opportunities and urgent challenges. By 2050, the continent is projected to be home to more than 2.5 billion people, including the world’s largest youth population. At the same time, shifting global capital flows, climate pressures, food insecurity and infrastructure gaps continue to demand innovative approaches to financing development and strengthening economic resilience.

Against this backdrop, ASIS 2026 will focus on mobilising catalytic capital, fostering strategic partnerships and creating scalable solutions capable of driving inclusive growth across emerging economies.

Speaking ahead of the summit, Mohamed Malick Fall, United Nations Resident Coordinator in Nigeria, underscored the importance of collective action in advancing Africa’s development priorities.

“Africa’s greatest opportunity lies in the strength of its partnerships. The Africa Social Impact Summit continues to provide a unique platform where governments, the private sector, development partners and civil society come together to mobilise the investments, innovation and collaboration needed to accelerate progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Together, we can build resilient economies that leave no one behind.”

Highlighting the importance of sustained collaboration across sectors, Abubakar Suleiman, Board Member, Sterling One Foundation, said the summit has evolved into more than an annual convening.

“What we are building through ASIS is not just a convening, but a long-term platform for action. The conversations we are having today must translate into real commitments, measurable outcomes and partnerships that outlive the summit itself. That is how we move from intention to impact across the continent.”

Nigeria’s Honourable Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Abubakar Atiku Bagudu, also emphasised the importance of platforms that strengthen collaboration between governments, investors and development partners.

“Nigeria welcomes platforms like the Africa Social Impact Summit that bring together global capital, innovation and policy dialogue. Strengthening collaboration between government, investors and development partners is critical to accelerating economic growth, improving livelihoods and advancing sustainable development across the continent.”

For the organisers, the summit represents a deliberate effort to create a platform where ideas, investment and leadership converge to deliver lasting impact.

Speaking on the significance of this year’s edition, Olapeju Ibekwe, Chief Executive Officer of Sterling One Foundation, noted that the summit has already demonstrated the power of partnerships to unlock transformative outcomes across Africa.

“The Africa Social Impact Summit platform has already unlocked over $1 billion across sectors, and this needs to be scaled significantly. The future of Africa will be defined by the quality of the sustainable partnerships we build today. The Africa Social Impact Summit is a platform that brings together African leaders, local and international investors, innovative ideas and catalytic capital to address some of the continent’s most pressing challenges while unlocking opportunities for inclusive and sustainable growth. We are excited to unveil an edition that is bigger, more collaborative and more action-oriented than ever before. We expect deals of over $500 million to be signed this year.”

The 2026 edition will prioritise investment and partnerships across sectors that are central to Africa’s long-term prosperity, including education, healthcare, climate resilience, food systems, gender equality and women’s empowerment, youth development, the creative economy and sustainable finance.

Through keynote addresses, ministerial dialogues, investor roundtables, policy discussions, innovation showcases and strategic partnership announcements, participants will explore practical pathways for financing development while accelerating implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals and the African Union’s Agenda 2063.

The summit is expected to attract more than 2,000 delegates from over 50 countries, including heads of government, multilateral organisations, development finance institutions, global investors, corporate leaders, entrepreneurs, philanthropists, innovators and civil society organisations. The gathering will provide opportunities to forge new partnerships, unlock investment opportunities and scale solutions capable of delivering measurable social and economic impact across Africa.

As momentum builds towards July, the Africa Social Impact Summit 2026 continues to position itself as a catalyst for transformative action, bringing together the leadership, capital and partnerships required to build resilient economies and shape Africa’s sustainable future.

Registration for the summit is now open. Leaders, investors, innovators, development partners and organisations interested in participating can register by visiting www.TheImpactSummit.org.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Sterling One Foundation.

About Africa Social Impact Summit (ASIS):
The Africa Social Impact Summit (ASIS), co-convened by the Sterling One Foundation and the United Nations in Nigeria, is a premier platform dedicated to accelerating sustainable development across Africa through innovation, financing and cross-sector partnerships. Since its launch in 2022, ASIS has convened leaders from government, business, philanthropy, development institutions and civil society to co-create actionable solutions that advance the Sustainable Development Goals and Africa’s long-term development agenda.

Media files

.

AFC Financing Supports Largest Power Plant in Burkina Faso to Tackle One of World’s Biggest Electricity Access Gaps

Source: APO

Burkina Faso is set to take a major step towards overcoming one of the world’s largest electricity access gaps after Africa Finance Corporation (AFC) reached financial close on funding for what will become the country’s biggest power plant.

In a country of 24 million, where only one in five people currently has access to electricity, AFC has successfully disbursed the first US$60 million tranche of a US$300 million corporate loan facility supporting development of the 119MW thermal power plant by Aksa Enerji Üretim A.Ş., Türkiye’s largest publicly listed power generation company.

The project is expected to transform Burkina Faso’s electricity system. The West African country currently imports approximately 60% of its power supply, leaving homes, businesses and industry vulnerable to supply disruptions and elevated energy costs, constraining industrialisation and economic growth. Once operational in 2027, the facility will reduce dependence on imported electricity by more than 50% while significantly strengthening domestic generation capacity. By delivering more reliable, lower-cost baseload power, the project is expected to improve energy security, attract private investment and create a stronger foundation for long-term economic growth.

The transaction marks AFC’s first investment in Burkina Faso, reinforcing the Corporation’s commitment to finance transformational infrastructure across every region of Africa. Expanding reliable electricity access remains central to AFC’s mission of accelerating industrialisation, strengthening economic resilience and unlocking sustainable growth.

The financing builds on AFC’s US$150 million corporate loan facility to Aksa Enerji in 2025, which supported the company’s utility-scale gas-to-power projects in Senegal and Ghana, including a 255MW brand new combined-cycle gas power plant in Senegal designed to use domestic natural gas and deliver more reliable and lower-emission baseload power. The successful execution of these projects established Aksa as a trusted partner in delivering large-scale energy infrastructure across Africa, providing the foundation for this expanded collaboration.

The financing underscores AFC’s strategy of partnering with experienced private-sector developers capable of delivering critical energy infrastructure at scale in markets where electricity shortages remain a major constraint on growth.

Samaila Zubairu, President & CEO of AFC, said: “Africa’s path to industrialisation and global competitiveness by 2050 depends on the infrastructure decisions we make today. Reliable electricity is fundamental to economic transformation. Without dependable power, countries cannot industrialise, businesses cannot grow and communities cannot realise their full economic potential. Aksa shares our commitment to delivering the reliable energy infrastructure needed to power Africa’s industrial growth and long-term transformation.”

Cemil Kazanci, Chairman of Aksa Energy commented, “Burkina Faso represents an important milestone in our long-term commitment to Africa. Together with AFC, we are delivering critical energy infrastructure that will strengthen energy security, support economic development and improve the reliability of electricity supply for millions.”

The investment further advances AFC’s broader strategy of strengthening national energy systems and enabling industrialisation through partnerships with experienced private-sector developers delivering transformational infrastructure across Africa.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Africa Finance Corporation (AFC).

Media files

.

UTM Offshore, Seplat Energy and Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Sign Gas Supply Agreement for Nigeria’s First Indigenous Floating Liquefied Natural Gas (FLNG) Project

Source: APO – Report:

.

UTM Offshore has signed a Gas Sales Agreement (GSA) with oil and gas company Seplat Energy and the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC), marking a vital step forward in the development of Nigeria’s first indigenous-led FLNG project. The agreement represents one of the final commercial building blocks ahead of a final investment decision, reinforcing confidence in a project that is expected to support Nigeria’s gas monetization strategy while expanding LNG exports and domestic gas utilization.

The African Energy Chamber (AEC) – representing the voice of the African energy sector –commends UTM Offshore, the NNPC and Seplat Energy for reaching this landmark agreement. The Chamber views the GSA as a significant step toward unlocking Nigeria’s vast offshore gas resources through indigenous leadership and strategic collaboration. As Africa seeks to maximize the value of its natural gas resources while strengthening energy security and industrial development, projects such as UTM FLNG demonstrate how African companies can lead world-scale infrastructure developments that generate investment, create jobs and position the continent as a more competitive LNG supplier.

Situated in the deepwater Yoho field offshore Nigeria, the FLNG project is expected to produce 176 million cubic feet per day once operational. Engineering and pre-construction activities have been completed, with the operator now pursuing the signing of the Sale and Purchase Agreement and FID following the GSA milestone. On a financing side, the project has secured debt capital from Afreximbank as well as equity commitments from the NNPC and Delta State Government. Global technology firms JGC Holdings and Technip Energies are currently reviewing the EPCIC contract, supporting the project as it advances toward a 2030 shipping target.   

“The signing of this GSA demonstrates what is possible when indigenous companies, national institutions and private investors work together toward a shared vision. UTM FLNG is more than an LNG project; it is a blueprint for how Africa can commercialize its gas resources through African leadership, create long-term economic value and strengthen energy security while supplying cleaner energy to both domestic and international markets,” states NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman of the AEC.

Advancements at the UTM FLNG project comes at a pivotal time for Nigeria’s natural gas sector as the country pursues new investments that align with its Decade of Gas Initiative. Focused on transforming the country into a gas-powered economy by 2030, the initiative aims to reduce gas flaring, improve energy access while monetizing the country’s 200 trillion cubic feet of proven gas reserves. Projects such as UTM FLNG represent a cornerstone of this strategy, raising Nigeria’s export capacity and strengthening its position in global energy markets.

Beyond exports, the project has also been structured to support Nigeria’s domestic energy ambitions. Approximately 300,000 tons per annum of LPG will be supplied to the local market, supporting cleaner household cooking fuels and reducing reliance on imports.

“It’s great to see companies like Seplat Energy come on board for this strategic project. We believe that the FLNG facility will strengthen Nigeria’s position as one of Africa’s leading LNG producers while providing a model for monetizing offshore gas resources across the continent. By combining indigenous ownership, strategic partnerships and world-class engineering, the project demonstrates how African-led developments can accelerate industrialization, reduce gas flaring and unlock greater value from the continent’s abundant natural gas resources,” Ayuk added. 

– on behalf of African Energy Chamber.

Flawed credit ratings in Africa: are top 3 western agencies driven by data or bias?

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Misheck Mutize, Post Doctoral Researcher, Graduate School of Business (GSB), University of Cape Town

The three major credit rating agencies – Moody’s, S&P Global and Fitch – have often differed among themselves when rating African institutions and countries. Their opinions don’t have to be aligned, but a huge gap in the ratings suggests inaccuracies in the analyses.

Wrong ratings have consequences. They drive up the cost of capital. Lower ratings indicate higher risk, and lead investors to demand higher interest rates to compensate for that risk. When a sovereign (country) is downgraded, its borrowing costs increase. It has to pay more interest on the same amount of debt, and has less chance of getting funding for development.

In the last three years there have been notable examples of rating agencies differing significantly in their decisions.

The first example is African Export-Import Bank. Between June 2025 and June 2026, the three major agencies reached materially different conclusions about the creditworthiness of the bank. The African Union has highlighted the flawed ratings.


Read more: Africa’s development banks are being undermined: the continent will pay the price


The second example is Fitch Ratings’ downgrade of the Nigerian industrial group Dangote Industries Limited on 6 August 2024. It cited risk linked to the construction of a refinery. A year later, the Dangote Oil Refinery proved to be a transformative project that rebalanced Nigeria’s trade position. It reduced the country’s imports and increased its domestic production. Fitch was wrong and its rating downgrades put the completion of the project at risk.

The African Finance Corporation shows a similar divide. S&P New York and its Chinese subsidiary gave widely differing assessments.

And finally, Moody’s downgraded Kenya in July 2024 while S&P maintained its B-rating.

These examples highlight the same problem: the differences between rating agencies ostensibly looking at the same set of risk factors.

In my view these discrepancies present African countries with two opportunities:

  • challenge the ratings

  • diversify their ratings and funding relationships away from the western markets.

Lastly, the differences highlight the need for rating agencies to be more objective and base their ratings on factual data and fundamentals.

The differences

Fitch downgraded the African Export-Import Bank twice, from BBB to BBB- in June 2025 and subsequently to BB+ in January 2026 before withdrawing its rating. This means Fitch stopped assigning ratings to the bank after its contract was cancelled.

Both Moody’s and S&P maintained investment-grade ratings, assigning Baa2 and BBB+, respectively. This is a three notch difference between Fitch and S&P on the same institution.

This rarely happens in other continents because the three international rating agencies assess largely similar risk factors in an entity’s ability to repay its loans.

The question is whether Fitch’s three-notch downgrades of Afreximbank were driven by facts about the bank or by analysts’ own subjective misjudgements.

Asian agencies tend to recognise the policy importance of Afreximbank, which plays a strategic role in financing Africa’s trade and development. As a result they recognise its preferred creditor status, that its member countries continue to repay the bank’s loans even during periods of crises.

Fitch, however, argued that Afreximbank’s role in Africa was diminishing and it was not a preferred creditor because the International Monetary Fund said so.

S&P Global Ratings aligned with China’s Chengxin International Credit and Japan Credit Rating Agency.

When Fitch Ratings downgraded Dangote Industries it said the risk was refinancing linked to a new oil refinery. Fitch speculated that delays in meeting funding requirements would make financial restructuring or default more likely, and that could trigger further downgrades.

Faced with such a conservative and speculative outlook, Dangote Industries Limited decided to end its contract with Fitch Ratings. It said the rating no longer made commercial sense and the group would instead focus on securing ratings from African-based rating agencies.

A year later, the Dangote Oil Refinery has turned Nigeria into a regional exporter and bolstered its energy security.

Moody’s downgraded Kenya on 8 July 2024 after the government withdrew planned tax hikes in response to protesters. S&P decided to wait for Kenya’s August 2024 budget.

The Moody’s downgrade resulted in a two-notch rating split on Kenya between Moody’s and S&P. Within six months Moody’s had reversed the downgrade with an outlook upgrade. Skipping from negative, past “stable”, to positive. It is highly unusual for a rating agency to revise its outlook within six months and to skip one notch.

It can be argued that the revision was an implicit admission by Moody’s that its earlier ratings were incorrect.

Kenya incurred approximately US$150 million in additional interest costs on existing Eurobond debt as investors rushed to sell off their bonds.

Alternatives

The high cost of capital, driven by weak ratings from the international rating agencies, is pushing Africa to shift towards Asia for foreign funding sources.

Five African countries have already issued a combined US$5 billion in bonds from Japan, China, Hong Kong, Korea and the United Arab Emirates over the past two years. This shift has made Asian rating agencies more relevant as no country or institution would raise capital in Asia without a rating from local rating agencies. These are giving some African institutions stronger assessments than their western peers. Asian agencies are equally independent and credible.

When Fitch Ratings downgraded Afreximbank to speculative grade, Asian rating agencies saw it differently. Chengxin International Credit Ratings Co. kept a stable AAA rating on Afreximbank. Japan Credit Rating Agency rates the bank A- stable for its Samurai bond programme. They differ widely from Fitch on the same institution, with the same balance sheet and the same mandate.

What needs to change

The widening rating splits among the three international rating agencies present an opportunity for African sovereigns and their institutions.

First, rather than accepting rating assessments that prove to be analytically flawed, African sovereigns and their institutions must challenge these ratings. In my view this will help the rating agencies be more thorough. It will also bring flawed ratings to the attention of international investors.

Second, African entities need to diversify their ratings and funding relationships away from the western markets. Domestic rating agencies have demonstrated a more nuanced understanding of local realities.

Lastly, the rating agencies need to be more objective. Analysts’ sentiments and frustrations should not find their way into the rating process.

– Flawed credit ratings in Africa: are top 3 western agencies driven by data or bias?
– https://theconversation.com/flawed-credit-ratings-in-africa-are-top-3-western-agencies-driven-by-data-or-bias-286364

President Dr Patrick Herminie Chairs Third Presidential Economic Advisory Council Meeting on Agriculture, Food Security and National Resilience

Source: APO


.

The President of the Republic, Dr Patrick Herminie, today chaired the third meeting of the Presidential Economic Advisory Council at State House, continuing the Council’s strategic deliberations on the future of agriculture and its role in strengthening Seychelles’ food security, economic resilience and national well-being.

The meeting built on the Council’s previous discussions, with particular focus on the policies and investments required to support a modern, productive and sustainable agriculture sector capable of meeting the country’s long-term development aspirations. Members also considered the important interrelationship between agriculture, nutrition and public health, recognising that resilient food systems are fundamental to the health and quality of life of the Seychellois people.

Also in attendance were Ms Jeniffer Vel, Chief of Staff and Economic Advisor to the President, and Secretary to the Council; Mr Wallace Cosgrow, Principal Minister and Minister for Fisheries, Agriculture and the Blue Economy; Mr Kevin Nancy, Principal Secretary for Agriculture; and members of the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The Council was briefed on current developments within the agriculture sector, including ongoing initiatives to strengthen domestic production, enhance biosecurity, improve institutional coordination and reinforce technical support for farmers.

Deliberations centred on the structural priorities necessary to unlock the sector’s full potential. These included improving access to finance, strengthening water security and energy efficiency, investing in agricultural technology and innovation, developing local skills, enhancing market linkages, promoting value addition, and encouraging production models that are commercially viable, environmentally responsible and responsive to the evolving needs of the country.

Members also highlighted the importance of ensuring that research, innovation and technical expertise are translated into practical solutions that improve productivity, strengthen farmer resilience and support evidence-based policy development.

Addressing the Council, President Herminie reaffirmed that agriculture remains a strategic national priority and an essential pillar of Seychelles’ long-term development. He emphasised that building a resilient agriculture sector requires coordinated action across Government, the private sector, financial institutions, research organisations and farming communities. The President underscored the importance of expanding access to finance, embracing technological innovation, improving resource efficiency, and creating an enabling environment that encourages investment, productivity and sustainable growth.

The President further noted that strengthening domestic agricultural production extends beyond food security. It is equally an investment in public health, economic resilience and national self-reliance, ensuring that future generations benefit from a food system that is secure, sustainable and capable of withstanding external shocks.

The meeting concluded with a shared commitment to advancing a coherent national approach to agricultural transformation, recognizing that sustained progress will depend on strong partnerships, innovation, strategic investment and policies that empower producers while safeguarding the country’s long-term food security and sustainable development objectives.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of State House Seychelles.

Treasury launches probe into Madlanga Commission allegations

Source: Government of South Africa

Treasury launches probe into Madlanga Commission allegations

National Treasury has announced the launch of an investigation into allegations of improper conduct involving a former National Treasury employee.

The investigation comes after testimony given at the Madlanga Commission and will be conducted by external forensic investigators.

“It has been alleged at the Madlanga Commission that a former employee improperly influenced the awarding of various transversal contracts during his time at the National Treasury. In light of the seriousness of the allegations presented, the National Treasury has initiated an investigation into the awarding of transversal contracts concluded during this period.

“The investigation will test the veracity of the allegations made and, importantly, determine any measures needed to further strengthen the procurement and award processes within the transversal contracting system. Findings of this investigation will be made public in the interest of public trust and good governance,” the department said in a statement on Wednesday.

Furthermore, the department said it has already started processing the Commission’s documentation requests.

“National Treasury… will continue to ensure that the Commission’s work is fully supported by the department.

“The National Treasury remains committed to transparency, accountability and integrity in public procurement and will take all necessary steps to ensure that any allegations of misconduct are thoroughly investigated and consequence management is applied,” the department assured.

Transversal contracts

Explaining the nature of transversal contracts, National Treasury explained that these are procurement arrangements that the department facilitates for “goods and services required by multiple public sector entities.

At the department itself, these contracts are managed by the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, who is responsible for “sourcing strategy, bid process, and contract award”.

“All transversal contracts managed by the National Treasury involve line departments who participate in the procurement process.

“For example, if a transversal contract is for the South African Police Service [SAPS], officials from SAPS would participate in the Bid Specification, Bid Evaluation and Bid Adjudication Committees, where they provide sector-specific expertise, confirm demand requirements, and contribute to evaluation and recommendation processes,” the department explained.

Additionally, public sector entities may choose to utilise transversal contracts.

“However, procurement transactions are conducted directly between the participating institution and the appointed suppliers. This model therefore combines centralised contracting with decentralised purchasing.

“The National Treasury recognises public interest in this matter; however, to protect the integrity of the investigation, the department will not provide media interviews while the process is underway,” National Treasury said. – SAnews.gov.za

NeoB

0