Egypt Seeks Strengthened Continental Mining Cooperation Through African Mining Week (AMW 2026) Participation

Source: APO


.

A delegation from Egypt’s Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources (MOPMN) met with the Energy Capital & Power (ECP) (www.EnergyCapitalPower.com) team to discuss the country’s anticipated participation in the upcoming African Mining Week (AMW), set to take place in Cape Town later this year.

Scheduled for October 14–16, 2026, at the Cape Town International Convention Centre, AMW will bring together African mining markets – including Egypt – with global investors to facilitate partnerships, deal-making and dialogue on the future of Africa’s mining sector.

The Egyptian delegation included Mr. Yasser Ramadan, Chairman, Egyptian Mineral Resources and Mining Industries Authority (MRMIA), Mr. Mohamad Ismael, MRMIA Board Member, Eng. Mahmoud Nagy, Undersecretary of Energy Efficiency, Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, Eng. Abeer Elsherbiny, Undersecretary, Technical Office of the Ministry, Eng. Nehal Khalil, Head of Communication and Events – Technical Office, MOPMN and Geol. Yosra Othman – Technical Office – MOPMN.

Discussions focused on Egypt’s potential engagement at AMW 2026, while also highlighting the country’s successful participation at AMW 2025, its strong interest in AMW 2027 and the potential to host a future edition of the event.

The Egyptian delegation emphasized its interest in using AMW as a platform to showcase the country’s extensive and commercially attractive mining prospects, alongside priority themes including legislation optimization, investment incentives, government-investor collaboration and local value addition.

Egypt is rich in a diverse array of mineral resources, particularly in the Eastern Desert and Sinai Peninsula. Key resources include gold (estimated at over 9 million ounces), 660 million tons of iron oxides, substantial deposits of phosphates, copper, high purity silica sand and coal.

Egyptian officials also highlighted the country’s mining cadastre – a digital platform scheduled for launch in Q2 2026 – which is expected to streamline investor access to opportunities, reduce red tape and significantly shorten permitting timelines. In addition, Egypt outlined ongoing cooperation discussions with Ghana and Nigeria aimed at strengthening intra-African partnership, noting that AMW could play a catalytic role in advancing this continental collaboration agenda.

“Egypt is making significant progress in mineral processing and beneficiation. The country has a strong mining foundation, and AMW may presents an important opportunity to deepen cooperation with other African players,” said James Chester, CEO of ECP.

Rachelle Kasongo, Event Director of AMW, underscored the event’s role in supporting Egypt’s mineral beneficiation objectives, particularly following the country’s gold value chain financing agreement with the African Export-Import Bank signed in late 2025.

As Africa’s official platform for shaping and advancing mining sector trends, AMW can integrate key topics influencing Egypt’s mining industry, while connecting global investors with Egyptian regulators, mining companies and emerging project opportunities.

Held under the theme Mining the Future: Unearthing Africa’s Full Mineral Value, AMW 2026 will feature high-level panel discussions, exclusive networking sessions and project showcases examining the role of Egypt and Africa’s mining value chains in securing global commodity supply chains.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Energy Capital & Power.

Call for renewed push to secure water and sanitation across Africa

Source: Government of South Africa

Call for renewed push to secure water and sanitation across Africa

Namibian President Dr Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah has called on African leaders to re-energise efforts to improve access to clean water and safe sanitation, saying that delayed investment has left millions vulnerable to climate shocks, poor health, and economic stagnation.

Addressing the African Union Africa Water Investment Programme (AIP) Summit on Sunday, President Nandi-Ndaitwah said the gathering was taking place at a critical moment under the African Union (AU) theme of the year: “Assuring Sustainable Water Availability and Safe Sanitation Systems to Achieve the Goals of Agenda 2063”.

“This Water Summit is being convened at the right time,” she said, stressing that water security must now be treated as a strategic development priority rather than an assumed natural endowment.

For decades, she noted, many African countries, particularly those endowed with perennial rivers, regarded water availability as guaranteed.

“Most countries in Africa took it for granted that access to water was as easy as walking to the river to fetch it. As such, allocating adequate funds to proper water infrastructure was not considered a top priority.

“However, the accelerating impacts of climate change have forced governments to confront a new reality. Climate change opened our eyes. What we considered permanent sources of water have been drying up,” Nandi-Ndaitwah said.

She acknowledged that investments in water and sanitation across the continent have been delayed and insufficient but urged leaders to adopt a forward-looking approach.

“Let us consider our delayed and limited investments in terms of ‘better late than never.’ Our gathering here today must re-energise our efforts to work towards improving access to clean water and sanitation.”

She highlighted that Namibia has played an active role in advancing the continental water investment agenda. In 2023, the country co-chaired the AU-Africa Water Investment Programme International High-Level Panel on Water Investments for Africa. The panel supported the publication of two key documents, namely the Africa’s Rising Investment Tide and the Africa Water Investment Action Plan.

According to Nandi-Ndaitwah, these documents provide practical guidance for AU Member States, development partners, and the private sector on how to mobilise an additional US$30 billion per year by 2030 to fund climate-resilient water infrastructure and sustainable sanitation systems.

“Commitments should be made and resources mobilised with the aim of closing the water investment gap,” she said, adding that implementation of both the AIP High-Level Panel Investment Action Plan and the UN 2023 Water Action Agenda in Africa must be accelerated.

Nandi-Ndaitwah also highlighted the broader security implications of water scarcity and inadequate sanitation, cautioning that shortages can fuel migration, displacement and even cross-border tensions.

“Water scarcity and sanitation pressures can lead to migration and displacement, which could trigger internal and cross-border conflicts,” she warned.

Targeted and results-driven investments are required to ensure sustainable water sources and prevent such conflicts, she added.

Sanitation ensures dignity

Beyond economic and security considerations, Nandi-Ndaitwah stressed the human dignity dimension of sanitation.

She said sanitation ensures dignity, good health, and a better life.

“The continent still lacks basic sanitation in many communities, a situation long neglected. Now that we have identified it as a priority, investments in sanitation programmes and projects are highly recommended.”

Nandi-Ndaitwah also urged leaders to prioritise community-centred service delivery, noting that improved sanitation is essential for public health and social well-being.

She noted Namibia’s own policy framework as an example of national commitment. Guided by Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6), Namibia adopted a National Water Supply and Sanitation Policy that promotes sustainable access to safe water, improved sanitation and hygiene through integrated planning, community participation and clear national targets for 2030.

The policy also emphasises environmental sustainability and efficient use of water resources.
“These are the types of policies that African countries and development partners should invest in and seek funding for,” she said.

She said Namibia is honoured to host the Global Water Fund as it relocates its headquarters to Windhoek.

“This reflects growing confidence in our commitment to sustainable water management and regional cooperation,” she said, adding that the move will contribute meaningfully to advancing water security and safe sanitation for all in Africa.

She further voiced optimism that renewed political will and collective commitment would translate into tangible progress.

“It is my hope that with our commitments and renewed drive for action, we will raise the required funds to ensure Africa’s water security and sanitation for all are achieved,” she said. – SAnews.gov.za

GabiK

14 views

Africa urged to turn water investment commitments into delivery

Source: Government of South Africa

Africa urged to turn water investment commitments into delivery

Former Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete has called on African leaders and partners to move decisively from pledges to implementation, warning that commitments alone will not deliver the water infrastructure the continent urgently needs.

Delivering closing remarks at the High-Level Side Event on Water Investment in Africa on the margins of the African Union Summit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Kikwete commended the African Union Commission, the Government of South Africa and development partners for convening what he described as a critical follow-up to the AU–Africa Water Investment Summit held in Cape Town alongside the G20 Summit last year.

Kikwete addressed the gathering in his capacity as the Alternate Co-Chair of the International High-Level Panel on Water Investments for Africa, Chair of the Global Water Partnership Southern Africa (GWPSA), and Chair of the Africa Coordination Unit, which serves as the Secretariat of the Africa Water Investment Programme (AIP).

“In these roles, I have witnessed firsthand the steady transformation from political vision to structured investment architecture,” he said.

He described the Cape Town Africa Water Investment Summit as a historic milestone, noting that between USD 10 billion and USD 12 billion in annual commitments had been pledged to support water development across the continent.

More than 80 projects from 38 countries were showcased, demonstrating what he called Africa’s shift from general aspirations to credible, investment-ready pipelines.

“Africa is no longer speaking in generalities. We are presenting credible, investment-ready pipelines,” Kikwete said.

However, he warned that the true test lies ahead. “Pledges alone do not deliver infrastructure nor water. What matters now is disciplined follow-through.” 

Kikwete welcomed progress reports presented during the session on investment pipelines and institutional systems designed to ensure delivery. He singled out the AIP–PIDA [Africa Water Investment Programme – Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa] Water Investment Scorecard as one of the most significant new accountability instruments.

Developed with strong technical support from the Global Water Partnership Organisation and other partners, the scorecard enables AU Member States to track progress, identify bottlenecks and strengthen governance in water investments.

He congratulated the African Union Commission for launching the first Scorecard Report.

“This is not merely a publication; it is a governance instrument. It signals that Africa is serious about measuring, tracking, and accelerating water investments with transparency and discipline,” Kikwete said.

Kikwete also extended congratulations to Namibia on concluding a Headquarters Agreement to host the Global Water Partnership Organisation (GWPO) in Windhoek, marking the relocation of its primary seat from Stockholm, Sweden.

“This is not simply an institutional arrangement. Hosting the GWPO in Namibia, in strategic collaboration with the Global Water Investment Platform, represents a unique opportunity for Africa and the Global South to lead.”

He commended Namibia’s leadership for positioning Africa at the centre of global water governance.
Outlining the Africa Water Investment Programme architecture, Kikwete said the AIP provides an integrated framework for project origination and technical preparation anchored on African soil, investment structuring and financial mobilisation through the Global Water Investment Platform, and high-level advocacy via the G20 Presidential Legacy, particularly the Global Outlook Council on Water Investments.

“This model positions Africa not as a recipient of fragmented financing, but as a co-architect of a new global water investment system,” he said.

Kikwete emphasised that Africa now has political leadership, a defined pipeline of programmes and an institutional architecture rooted on the continent.

“What we must now accelerate is financial closure and implementation,” he said.

As the High-Level Panel, Kikwete pledged continued engagement at the highest political level to sustain momentum. As the AIP Secretariat, he said GWPSA would intensify technical support, project preparation, and blended finance structuring.

Kikwete called on Ministers from the African Ministers’ Council on Water (AMCOW) and development partners to ensure commitments translate into bankable projects and tangible impact.

“The measure of our success will not be in the number of declarations adopted, but in the number of communities gaining access to safe water and sanitation, the socio-economic sectors receiving the water they need to thrive, and the resilience we build against climate shocks,” Kikwete said.

He concluded with a call for urgency and unity. “Let this AU Summit year on water and sanitation be remembered as the year Africa moved decisively from commitment to capital, and from capital to construction.” – SAnews.gov.za

GabiK

50 views

Government at work to resolve water challenges

Source: Government of South Africa

Government at work to resolve water challenges

Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni has moved to assure that government is at work to resolve the water crisis currently experienced in parts of the country.

Ntshavheni was speaking during the Debate of the State of the Nation Address (SONA) held in Cape Town on Tuesday afternoon.

The water challenges reached a crescendo last week when residents in Johannesburg protested, with some maintaining to have been without water for at least three weeks.

“The work has already commenced. The OV [Operation Vulindlela] team and the Department of Water and Sanitation have started with the assessments towards a water action plan that should be ready by mid-March 2026, and a call for technical capacity as part of mobilising resources and expertise to support municipalities in crisis is in the works.

“The current draft Water Action Plan is focused on immediate crisis, propelling reforms in the water sector and unlocking investments in the municipal infrastructure,” Minister Ntshavheni assured.

During the SONA last week, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced the establishment of the National Water Crisis Committee to resolve the challenges faced by citizens in a similar vein to the success of the National Energy Crisis Committee.

“This structure will bring together all existing efforts into a single coordinating body.  It will deploy technical experts and resources from the national government to municipalities facing water challenges. It will ensure that action is taken swiftly and effectively to address the problem. 

“To address the challenges effectively, we will not hesitate to use the powers enshrined in the Constitution and in the Water Services Act to intervene in municipalities where necessary.

“We will hold to account those who neglect their responsibility to supply water to our people,” President Ramaphosa said at the time. – SAnews.gov.za

NeoB

24 views

Kizza Besigye: the firebrand who has shaped opposition politics in Uganda

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Barney Walsh, Senior Lecturer in Security, Leadership and Development Education, King’s College London

Uganda’s Kizza Besigye has been described as possibly the most arrested man in Africa. Besigye was once President Yoweri Museveni’s ally, and personal physician. He broke ranks with Museveni in 1999, and emerged as the most long-standing political opponent to the ageing president, who has run the country since 1986. For this, Besigye has been jailed, kept under house arrest, renditioned, forced into exile, and endured state violence countless times. He has been in jail since 2024. Barney Walsh and Dennis Jjuuko have studied Besigye’s remarkable political career.

Who is Kizza Besigye?

Kizza Besigye was born in Rukungiri district, south-western Uganda, in April 1956. After graduating with a degree in human medicine from Makerere University in 1980, he joined the National Resistance Army (NRA) rebellion, which dislodged the dictatorial rule of President Milton Obote in 1986.

Besigye served in different senior positions in Museveni’s new government, including minister of state for internal affairs and the president’s office. In 1993, he was appointed the army’s chief of logistics and engineering and later senior military adviser to the defence minister. He was part of the inner sanctum of the National Resistance Movement which became the civilian government.

Besigye remained close to Museveni until 1999, when he abandoned the ruling party. He said the movement had departed from its original principles, like democracy through free elections, security for all and eliminating corruption.

He believed Uganda needed liberation again, this time from a government he’d helped establish. This would define his life’s work.

Under the pressure group “Reform Agenda”, and later the political party Forum for Democratic Change, he was the leading contender against Museveni in successive presidential polls. He scored 27% of the vote in 2001, 37% in 2006, 26% in 2011, and 35% in 2016. The Ugandan supreme court acknowledged irregularities but refused to overturn the result in 2006.

After leaving the government, Besigye became the focal point for Ugandans wary of Museveni’s increasingly vicious authoritarianism. He was forced to flee to South Africa after the 2001 presidential elections. He has been brutalised, detained and charged numerous times. His younger brother died in 2007 from illness associated with incarceration on trumped-up conspiracy charges.

When the opposition one day take the reins of power in Uganda, the debt it owes Besigye will be immense.

What are the highlights of this legacy?

Besigye, 69, stands out as the foremost opposition figure who was part of Museveni’s original Bush War victory. His 2011 “walk to work” protests, in response to dramatic fuel prices and general inflation, will not be forgotten in the history of Uganda’s political economy.

Besigye seemed to think this civil action could be Uganda’s “Arab Spring” moment. Some mocked his efforts as a mis-reading of the socio-economic conditions in sub-Saharan Africa.

The protests were, indeed, subdued in the face of brutal repression by security agencies.

But similar protests would soon remove Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe in 2017 and Blaise Compaoré in Burkina Faso in 2014.

Besigye has developed credibility as someone trustworthy because of what he has been through. And he has a heartfelt connection with supporters.

His leadership has transcended other opposition figures during Museveni’s administration in terms of longevity and consistent vision for change. Other opposition leaders have emerged only fleetingly, failing to sustain any moral standing or coherent transformative vision.

As we argue in our recent paper, it is unclear whether opposition leader Robert Kyagulanyi (better known as Bobi Wine) could have emerged without Besigye laying the foundation and sustaining the momentum for change.

It’s important, too, to recognise his failings.

He is given to outbursts. His call for Chinese debts to be written off as odious was thought to alienate an essential development partner. His storming of what he described as a “rigging centre” during the 2016 election led to accusations of leading mobs to take over elections.

He is also partly to blame for the fact that Uganda’s opposition has not yet mustered a single candidate against Museveni due to competing egos and moral certitudes. Besigye has never seemed to be able to convince other opposition candidates to drop their candidacy and support him (or to do that for them).

Nevertheless, his individual role has been fundamental to the emergence of the idea and principle of peaceful opposition politics emerging in Uganda in the post-1986 era.

This is not to be underestimated in a country which has yet to experience a peaceful change of government since independence in 1962.

What is the context in which you assess his legacy?

Uganda’s post-1986 political landscape has been dominated, and controlled, by Museveni. His most recent election victory in January 2026 will extend his reign beyond 40 years.

While his public popularity has been in decline, Museveni has relied on two things. First is the Ugandan political and military elite. Since the mid-2000s he has taken steps to proof his regime against a military coup, by keeping influential military personnel on board.

Second is external support, mainly from western governments. This stems from Uganda’s involvement as a key security actor in the sub-region at the behest of western powers. This role has gradually been prioritised over the west’s pursuit of human rights.

Partly for these reasons, Besigye was never able to get the full backing of western donors to support his democratic goals. Instead they supported Museveni’s regime.

A lack of support for Besigye in western capitals was evident in 2024 when he was abducted while visiting Kenya, and returned as a prisoner to Kampala. It barely registered international condemnation or action – save for a belated push from US lawmakers.

This silence must be seen within a global context of democratic backsliding, including developments within President Donald Trump’s second term.

In east Africa, Kenya’s violent response to the 2024 Gen Z riots in Nairobi included state-led abductions and enforced disappearances targeting young people linked to the protest movement.

In Tanzania, the October 2025 presidential elections also saw human rights abuses of protestors met with unjustified lethal force.

What next?

Besigye has not managed to shake up Museveni’s inner circle of corrupt powerbrokers. This is because his progressive democratic vision of change threatens their privileges.

Neither has he ever enjoyed the global profile that he would have hoped for, such as Raila Odinga of Kenya or Morgan Tsvangirai of Zimbabwe managed – even as Bobi Wine did briefly before the 2021 election.

But the idea of a free and fair election is now at least ingrained in Uganda’s people. In a February 2025 interview, he revealed the lens through which his life work should be viewed:

We can only influence whether change happens quickly or is delayed, but change is inevitable. Sooner or later, Ugandans will take charge of their destiny and rebuild their country in a way that ensures equal opportunities for everyone.

If Besigye’s decades of sacrifice are to mean anything beyond retrospective praise, they demand engagement now, not memorialisation later. To remain silent is to collude in the slow erasure of a political life spent insisting that a truly democratic Uganda was a cause worth fighting for.

– Kizza Besigye: the firebrand who has shaped opposition politics in Uganda
– https://theconversation.com/kizza-besigye-the-firebrand-who-has-shaped-opposition-politics-in-uganda-275568

Sierra Leone’s harsh new laws to protect women and girls are causing harm in the wrong places

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Luisa T. Schneider, Assistant Professor, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Independent Social Research Foundation

In the decades after Sierra Leone’s civil war (1991-2002), there was pressure on the west African country to demonstrate progress on gender equality. Laws were passed to fight domestic violence, rape and teen pregnancy. But drawing on colonial legal models, the reforms don’t always match social realities and in many cases are harming young people from poor communities. Punishment is being made more important than resolution or education.

Luisa T. Schneider is an anthropologist who has spent a decade researching the subject. We asked her about her open source book Love and Violence in Sierra Leone: Mediating Intimacy after Conflict.


What did your study involve?

My research began in Freetown in 2012, ten years after the civil war’s violence, especially against women and girls. In 2016 I began living in a hillside community in eastern Freetown and also with a group of young men downtown. For 13 months I studied intimate relationships and followed disputes from household quarrels to community mediations and court cases, tracing over 100 through the magistrate’s court. I also spent time in Central Prison, interviewing men and boys convicted in “women cases”.

I wanted to know how love and violence intersect in everyday life and how law reshapes both.

What did you find?

In Sierra Leone, gender and relationships lie at the heart of moral life. Care, warmth and resilience are virtues held in high regard, and they are cultivated and learnt from women. But this masks the widespread abuse of women and places the unpaid labour of holding families and communities together on them. When the state tries to regulate intimacy without considering these moral realities, it deepens the very violence it seeks to end.


Read more: Why Sierra Leonean women don’t feel protected by domestic violence laws


Love and violence often live together, tangled in ways that make harm hard to end. People say that when harm occurs, judgment falls not only on the act but on the person’s character. Communities call for state involvement in cases of rape against minors or severe violence. But everyday conflicts in consensual relationships are generally understood as matters of character and relational repair rather than criminal intent. They are mediated internally, often by women who bear the burden to prioritise group stability over punishment.

Yet, the country’s legal system often tells a different story.

After the war, new laws were introduced to protect women and girls from rape, early pregnancy, and domestic violence. Key laws include:

  • Sexual Offences Act (2012; amended 2019): criminalises rape, sexual assault and sexual exploitation; raises age of consent to 18; mandatory sentences; zero-tolerance enforcement reshapes policing of adolescent sexuality and youth relationships.

  • Domestic Violence Act (2007): criminalises physical, sexual, emotional and economic abuse within intimate and family relationships; recognises private-sphere violence as a public concern.

  • Child Rights Act (2007; revised 2025): defines children as rights-bearing subjects entitled to care, protection and due process, aligned with international standards.

  • Prevention of Child Marriage Act (2024): prohibits marriage under 18 to end early marriage and related health and educational harms.

  • Diversion and Alternatives to Detention Framework (2025): redirects children in conflict with the law from imprisonment to rehabilitation, mediation and reintegration.

Together, these reforms are meant to protect. But I found they also collapse care, consent and harm into a single criminal framework that misfits the lived realities of the Sierra Leoneans I lived and worked with. Importantly, mine is not an argument against protecting children from sexual harm, but about how protection is defined and enforced.

Although recent reforms frame children as having rights and promote alternatives to detention, boys charged under sexual offences law are routinely denied bail and treated as adult perpetrators. This reveals a contradiction in the system. It conflates rape, harm and consensual adolescent intimacy into a single category of criminality.

By raising the age of consent to 18, many ordinary youth relationships became criminalised. A 19-year-old can now face years in prison because his girlfriend is 17, even though she has chosen to love him. In aiming for zero tolerance, the state has policed intimacy instead of teaching consent.

In a society battling poverty and corruption, the new laws often shield the wealthy and punish the powerless. Young couples, especially across class lines, can be convicted, while powerful older men who abuse children can walk free.

One High Court judge told me:

We have serious problems with rape in this country. But of 25 or maybe 30 cases … mostly there are boyfriends here, you know, lovers. Maybe almost 23 of them are lovers. But the law is so rigid that I have to convict no matter the circumstance.

The updated Sexual Offences Act has deepened fear. It lowered the age of criminal responsibility to 12; sexual cases are now sent directly to the High Court; and life sentences are allowed.

Convictions happen even when girls testify that they love the boy or man who stands accused and confirm consensual sex took place. Many of the cases I studied are initiated by parents, neighbours, or teachers. This was often after pregnancies, school conflicts, or community disputes made relationships visible. Often the relationship happened within unequal social conditions between the partners.

In my view, what communities seek to mend through care, the law isolates and punishes. Conversations about consent, safety and protection disappear when love itself risks imprisonment. Women in violent relationships, meanwhile, lose attention and resources as the system turns to criminalising consensual intimacy.

What does this say about gender and justice?

Sierra Leoneans believe a good man is made not by punishment but by being raised with respect, love and care for others. As a community elder put it:

A child taught to kill becomes cruel. A child taught to love protects everyone.

Yet laws carry war’s legacy in their effort to discipline masculinity instead of guiding it.

What do you hope readers take away from your book?

Sierra Leone’s moral vision, found in everyday speech, mediation practices and women’s community leadership, reminds us that femininity is not weakness but wisdom. And that any just system must build on that strength.

If women were actually treated as they are morally regarded in Freetown – as strong, capable and central to social wellbeing – then both patriarchy and violence would begin to lose their hold. Ending violence begins in the home, in everyday care, and in the way we raise our children.

This isn’t just about Sierra Leone. It matters the world over. Law alone cannot end violence. Laws can punish, but they cannot teach care, consent or empathy. Yet punishment increasingly replaces education.


Read more: We used performing arts to map out gender violence in Sierra Leone. What we found


The lesson is clear: without engaging local understandings of care, consent and responsibility, laws meant to protect risk reproducing harm rather than preventing it.

– Sierra Leone’s harsh new laws to protect women and girls are causing harm in the wrong places
– https://theconversation.com/sierra-leones-harsh-new-laws-to-protect-women-and-girls-are-causing-harm-in-the-wrong-places-269662

South Africa’s foreign policy is rooted in negotiation with all nations – a shifting global order makes this difficult

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Tinashe Sithole, Postdoctoral research fellow at the SARChI Chair: African Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, University of Johannesburg

Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, South Africa’s foreign policy has been under sustained international scrutiny.

Its stance on the war in Ukraine has been one of active non-alignment. This means it has called for negotiations while abstaining from UN resolutions condemning Russia. However, it decided to take Israel to the International Court of Justice over the Gaza conflict in December 2023.

To many observers, including US policymakers and international analysts, these decisions suggest uncertainty or inconsistency. However, a closer look suggests a different interpretation.

In my recent research, I show how South Africa’s negotiated transition to democracy has shaped a foreign policy tradition that prioritises mediation, multilateralism and non-alignment.

I argue that South Africa’s foreign policy since 1994, including the period after the 2024 election, has been shaped by more than political shifts.

Instead, its negotiated democratic transition experience continues to guide how the country understands conflict and cooperation. This is even as the costs of maintaining this approach rise in a more fragmented and competitive global order. I describe this trajectory as “idealism under strain” – a principle-based foreign policy maintained under growing external pressure.

As a middle power, South Africa exerts influence most effectively through international institutions. By working through the African Union (AU), the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the UN, it helps broker agreements and shape regional and global agendas.

What has changed is the international environment. Global politics has become more polarised and more transactional. States are increasingly expected to take clear sides on major issues, from security alignments to trade relations. This shift has narrowed the space for diplomatic independence.

In this context, South Africa’s preference for dialogue and institutional process has become harder to sustain and easier to misinterpret. Positions that once appeared principled are now criticised as evasive or contradictory.

This matters because South Africa’s influence depends less on power and more on trust.

To remain effective, it needs to continue leading regional mediation and peace efforts and to apply its principles consistently. When its positions on international law or human rights appear selective, its credibility weakens. When they are consistent, its voice carries more weight.

Behind the choices

South Africa’s post-apartheid foreign policy reflects the negotiated nature of its democratic transition. The end of apartheid in 1994 came through compromise rather than a military victory. This experience shaped a preference for mediation over coercion; for dialogue over exclusion.

These preferences shaped the country’s early diplomatic engagements on the continent. In Burundi (1999-2003), the Democratic Republic of Congo (2002-2003) and Lesotho (1998 and again from 2014 to 2017), South Africa promoted negotiated political settlements and power-sharing arrangements rather than military solutions.

This history helps explain current policy choices, including the call for negotiations on Ukraine.

It also explains the contrast in how the country engages across crises. For example, in 2023 it brought the case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. In other situations, such as political tensions in Zimbabwe, it has relied on quiet diplomacy, working behind the scenes rather than openly criticising the government.

In my view, these decisions reflect an adaptation to constraint rather than inconsistency.

This pattern has persisted across administrations. Successive governments have sought to balance democratic values with geopolitical realities rather than abandon one in favour of the other.

What has changed is the level of external pressure under which this balance must now be maintained.

A changing world

A more polarised and transactional world has narrowed the space for diplomatic independence.

Pressure from the US to align with the west has become more explicit, particularly following the South Africa vs Israel case.

Tensions have also affected the trade relationship. In Washington, some lawmakers called for a review of South Africa’s eligibility for the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa). The legislation provides duty-free access to the US market. The criticism reflected concerns that South Africa’s positions on Russia and Israel, and its broader stance of non-alignment, were increasingly seen as out of step with US foreign policy priorities.

South Africa’s Agoa benefits expired in September 2025 and were only renewed on 3 February 2026. The months of uncertainty highlighted the economic risks that can accompany geopolitical pressure.

For a country whose influence depends more on diplomacy and external partnerships, such signals matter. They show how the costs of maintaining diplomatic independence are rising in a more competitive international environment.

What needs to happen next

South Africa is unlikely to abandon its preference for mediation, multilateralism and non-alignment. The key challenge is how it sustains this approach as international pressure intensifies.

First, South Africa needs to use the institutions where it already has influence more actively. This means taking visible leadership roles in the AU and SADC, and continuing its involvement in UN peace missions. These platforms are the main channels through which the country exercises diplomatic influence.

Second, regional cooperation needs to result in coordinated action. Conflicts in places such as Mozambique or eastern Democratic Republic of Congo affect neighbouring states and cannot be managed by one country alone. Working with regional partners on joint mediation and shared responses helps avoid fragmented or competing interventions.

Third, consistency matters. When South Africa calls for international law, negotiated settlements or civilian protection, the same principles should guide its positions across different conflicts. Applying these standards evenly reduces accusations of selectivity and helps preserve trust in its role.

These priorities do not require a new foreign policy. They reflect the need to apply an existing approach more clearly and more consistently.

– South Africa’s foreign policy is rooted in negotiation with all nations – a shifting global order makes this difficult
– https://theconversation.com/south-africas-foreign-policy-is-rooted-in-negotiation-with-all-nations-a-shifting-global-order-makes-this-difficult-275033

Infrastructure challenges threaten water supply

Source: Government of South Africa

Infrastructure challenges threaten water supply

Water and Sanitation Minister Pemmy Majodina says ageing infrastructure, leaks and poor governance are undermining the reliable supply of water. 

Speaking to media on the sidelines of the 39th Ordinary Session of the African Union (AU) Assembly of Heads of State and Government in Addis Ababa, Majodina reiterated that the country’s major dams hold sufficient water, but systemic weaknesses in municipal infrastructure are placing water security at risk.

“…As we pump the water, the infrastructure has decayed. The water is leaking and treated water, which is supposed to reach households, is running down the streets,” Majodina said.

The Minister’s remarks come amid ongoing water supply challenges in Johannesburg, where residents have experienced intermittent shortages, low pressure and disruptions linked to a system strain.

Majodina explained that her department’s constitutional mandate is primarily focused on bulk water resource development, including building dams, tunnels and canals, while municipalities are responsible for reticulation and distribution.

However, national government has stepped in to support local interventions, where possible.

She said working with Rand Water, government has invested in major bulk infrastructure, including upgrades to the Zuikerbosch Water Treatment Works System, one of the largest facilities in the country.

“That plant has the capacity not only to supply [to] South Africa but even to provide treated water to neighbouring countries,” the Minister said.

The core problem, she stressed, lies in municipal infrastructure that has not kept pace with rapid urban growth.

“When you drive through Johannesburg, you see water flowing in the streets. That is treated water. It is not reaching the taps because pipes are leaking,” Majodina said.

Consumption

The Minister also noted that South Africa’s per capita water consumption far exceeds international norms. While the global benchmark stands at approximately 173 litres per person per day, South Africa’s consumption has been recorded at around 239 litres per person per day.

“That is abnormal. If we continue at that rate, we are going to collapse the system,” she warned.

To stabilise supply in Johannesburg, she said authorities have implemented load shifting between pump stations and introduced “water soft locking”, a measure to reduce water pressure across the system.

“Soft locking does not mean people will not have water. It means we reduce the pressure so that those who are not getting water can receive supply,” Majodina explained.

She said municipalities have been advised to increase reservoir storage capacity and ring-fence water revenue to reinvest in infrastructure maintenance and upgrades.

“We have told municipalities to ring-fence water sales and invest back into water infrastructure. They have not done so. Today, some systems have collapsed because they do not have engineers and scientists,” she said.

Illegal connections and vandalism

Majodina further raised concern about illegal connections, vandalism and so-called “water mafias”, who tamper with infrastructure.

“Our infrastructure is vandalised day in and day out. Illegal connections are contributing to losses and destabilising the system.”

The Minister highlighted the significance of the proposed Water Services Amendment Bill, which seeks to separate the roles of water services authorities and water services providers.

“Currently, in many municipalities, you are both the referee and the player at the same time (sic). There is no oversight. If systems fail, no one is held accountable,” she said.

Majodina said the amendment bill will enable clearer governance distinctions and strengthen national government’s ability to intervene where service delivery collapses, a power currently limited under constitutional provisions that assign water services to local government.

Groundwater development

Looking ahead, she said government will intensify its focus on groundwater development, particularly in underserved communities that have never had access to clean piped water.

“We have not fully tapped into groundwater potential, especially for communities that have never received a drop of clean water,” she said.

While acknowledging that water challenges extend beyond South Africa to the broader continent, Majodina maintained that the country’s immediate priority is fixing infrastructure, strengthening governance, and restoring public confidence.

Meanwhile, Majodina has welcomed President Cyril Ramaphosa’s recent commitment to chair the National Water Crisis Committee, describing it as a crucial step in elevating water reform to the highest level of government. – SAnews.gov.za

GabiK

72 views

“Kenya Has Proven It Can Host the World,” Affirms Rugby Africa President as HSBC SVNS 2 Draws over 15,000 Fans in Nairobi

Source: APO – Report:

Herbert Mensah, President of Rugby Africa (www.RugbyAfrique.com), the continental governing body of rugby across Africa, and a member of World Rugby’s Executive Board, praised Kenya for delivering a world-class HSBC SVNS 2 tournament in Nairobi, describing the event as a statement of Africa’s readiness to host global rugby competitions.

Held at Nyayo National Stadium, the opening leg of HSBC SVNS 2 attracted over 15,000 fans across the weekend, alongside key dignitaries including Hon. Salim Mvurya, Kenya’s Cabinet Secretary for Youth Affairs, Creative Economy and Sports. The vibrant atmosphere and seamless organization reinforced Kenya’s reputation as one of Africa’s leading rugby nations.

The Nairobi leg featured 12 men’s and women’s international teams competing for promotion back to the revamped HSBC SVNS series. Kenya’s national men’s team, Shujaa, delivered a strong campaign, finishing third to secure a bronze medal and 16 points in the standings, behind Germany (20 points) and the USA (18 points).

Speaking following the tournament, Mensah commended Kenya Rugby Union and local authorities for their execution of the event.

“Impressively, it’s sold out,” said Mensah. “What do you expect? HSBC on African soil with the incredible Kenyans. This is what happens when you combine world-class rugby with passionate supporters.”

“Kenya has proven that it can host the world. The organization, the energy in the stadium, the government support, this is a blueprint for Africa. When Africa hosts, Africa delivers.”

The tournament also marked another milestone in Africa’s growing role within World Rugby’s global events strategy, with HSBC SVNS competitions now staged across multiple continents as part of a restructured pathway system.

“Africa is not the future of rugby, Africa is the now,” Mensah added. “When 15,000 people come to celebrate the sport, when leaders of government stand behind it, when young boys and girls see themselves on that stage, you are building something far greater than a tournament. You are building belief.”

Kenya’s hosting success aligns with Rugby Africa’s broader vision of positioning the continent as a key destination for international rugby. From packed stadiums to government partnership and broadcast reach, the Nairobi leg demonstrated the commercial and cultural potential of rugby events in Africa.

As the HSBC SVNS 2 series now moves to Montevideo and São Paulo, Kenya’s successful hosting of the opening leg sets a strong benchmark for future global rugby events on the continent.

The Nairobi tournament, held on 14–15 February 2026, reinforced Africa’s growing influence in the global rugby landscape as both competitors and capable hosts on the world stage.

– on behalf of Rugby Africa.

Media contact:
Nicole Vervelde
Communications Manager
nicole.vervelde@rugbyafrique.com

About Rugby Africa:
Rugby Africa (www.RugbyAfrique.com) is the governing body of rugby in Africa and one of the regional associations under World Rugby. It unites all African countries that play rugby union, rugby sevens, and women’s rugby. Rugby Africa organizes various competitions, including the qualifying tournaments for the Rugby World Cup and the Africa Sevens, a qualifying competition for the Olympic Games. With 40 member unions, Rugby Africa is dedicated to promoting and developing rugby across the continent. World Rugby highlighted Ghana, Nigeria and Zambia as three of the six emerging nations experiencing strong growth in rugby.

Media files

.

Water key to Africa’s economic future

Source: Government of South Africa

Water key to Africa’s economic future

Water and Sanitation Minister Pemmy Majodina has stressed that Africa cannot realise meaningful economic growth without urgent investment in water infrastructure.

“We cannot have Africa developing economically when there is no water,” Majodina said.

Speaking during a media doorstep interview on the margins of the 39th Ordinary Session of the African Union (AU) Assembly of Heads of State and Government, held on 14 – 15 February in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Majodina placed water security at the centre of the continent’s development agenda.

The Minister commenced her second day at the summit by hosting, in collaboration with the AU High-Level Panel, a side event titled ‘High-Level Leaders Session on Water Investment’, sponsored by the Association of Water and Sanitation Institutions in South Africa (AWSISA).

The session brought together Ministers, development partners, financiers, and private sector representatives to assess progress made since the inaugural Water Investment Summit held in Cape Town in August 2025.

Majodina said Africa faces a massive backlog in water infrastructure, warning that without decisive action, the continent’s ambitions for industrialisation, job creation and improved living standards will remain out of reach.

“Let us start rolling out the Water Investment Summit to check how far we can go as a continent in mobilising financial resources to fund water infrastructure. The backlog is huge.

“We cannot have Africa developing economically when there is no water. We need socio-economic development. We need to ensure that livelihoods are sustained as expected. But our people are suffering when it comes to water,” Majodina said.

In a pointed call to action, Majodina linked water security to the AU’s broader peace and stability objectives.

“Everyone talks about silencing the guns. Silence the guns and open the taps. That is where we are coming from. Silence the guns, open the taps.”

She urged African governments and the private sector to make firm commitments toward financing water infrastructure, emphasising that public resources alone will not be sufficient to close the funding gap.

“Let each country commit. Let the private sector commit to water infrastructure investment,” she said.

She emphasised that the mining industry must play a more active role in supporting sustainable water systems across the continent. “We have a lot of mines across the continent operating in our countries, but they are not committing enough in terms of funding water infrastructure.” 

Drawing on South Africa’s experience, the Minister cited challenges in the City of Johannesburg, where ageing infrastructure has struggled to keep pace with rapid urbanisation and economic growth.

“When you talk about Johannesburg, you talk about the ‘United Nations of Africa’. Everybody goes there. The economy is growing, the population is growing but the infrastructure can no longer cope,” she said.

The Cape Town Water Investment Summit, held on 15 – 16 August 2025, marked a significant milestone in mobilising funding for the sector. According to Majodina, investors at that summit committed between $10 billion and $12 billion towards water infrastructure development.

In addition, 38 of Africa’s 54 countries submitted bankable project proposals aimed at attracting infrastructure financing.

“We came up with valuable projects from 38 countries… that can be funded. Today, we are here to give a progress report on how far are we in terms of implementing that,” Majodina said.

Stability

The Minister also underscored the link between water and peace, noting that instability across parts of the continent continues to undermine development.

She said water cooperation can serve as a platform for regional integration and shared prosperity, particularly in transboundary river basins.

The Minister further noted the upcoming United Nations Water Conference scheduled to take place in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) from 2 – 4 December 2026.

The conference, co-hosted by Senegal and the UAE, aims to accelerate the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6), enhance global water governance, and further elevate water-related issues on the international agenda.

“As leaders, we must move from declarations to implementation. Water must be at the centre of Africa’s development agenda,” Majodina said. – SAnews.gov.za

GabiK

52 views