Mining Indaba to strengthen collaboration between government, investors

Source: Government of South Africa

Mining Indaba to strengthen collaboration between government, investors

Next week’s Mining Indaba Investment Forum will provide an opportunity for direct engagement between government and investors, with a strong emphasis on strengthening collaboration between the public and private sectors. 

This as the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (the dtic), in partnership with the Departments of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (DMPR) and Water and Sanitation (DWS), will host the joint Mining Indaba Investment Forum at the Cape Town International Convention Centre, in Cape Town on Monday, 9 February 2025.

Held under the theme:  “Building Critical Minerals Value Chains in South Africa”, the high-impact, investor-focused forum aims to showcase South Africa’s critical minerals investment proposition and highlight bankable, investor-ready projects across the value chain.

“Moreover, this is also an opportunity for direct engagement between government and investors, with a strong emphasis on strengthening collaboration between the public and private sectors,” said the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic) on Tuesday.

A high-level panel of Ministers and private-sector representatives will lead discussions on enabling South Africa’s Critical Minerals Strategy, as well as advancing industrialisation, beneficiation and sustainable value-chain development.

The forum will also serve as a platform to position South Africa as a value-adding hub for critical minerals. In addition, it will showcase investor-ready projects and provide an opportunity for global investors to share market perspectives.

“The 2026 Mining Indaba provides an important opportunity to reinforce South Africa’s investment appeal in critical minerals.”

The department said the Indaba remains the world’s largest mining investment conference, drawing governments, global mining companies, original equipment manufacturers, technology firms, financiers, and development institutions. –SAnews.gov.za
 

Edwin

40 views

Police appeal for assitance in locating dangerous suspect

Source: Government of South Africa

Police appeal for assitance in locating dangerous suspect

Police in Kopanong and Parkweg are seeking the public’s assistance in locating a suspect identified as 32-year-old Lloyd Mcdonald Siswe Jacobs, who is wanted for a number of serious offenses, including rape and conspiracy to commit murder.

On Sunday, 11 May 2025, at approximately 14:00, Kopanong police responded to a complaint at Muirfield Flats, North End Street, Navalsig. 

It is alleged that a 35-year-old victim met the man, known to her at the time as “Shane Carson” via Facebook. The suspect invited the victim to his residence for their first date.

Upon arrival, the suspect allegedly served the victim juice, after which she began to feel physically exhausted and disoriented. 

The suspect then allegedly moved the victim to the bathroom, where he proceeded to rape her. The victim managed to escape the premises after the suspect allowed her to step outside for fresh air.

Following intensive investigations, a warrant of arrest has been issued by the Bloemfontein Magistrate’s Court for Jacobs.

“Investigations reveal that Jacobs utilises social media platforms, specifically Facebook, to lure and target victims under false identities. Furthermore, the suspect is also wanted in connection with a conspiracy to commit murder case, currently being investigated by Parkweg SAPS,” the police said in a statement. 

“The police urges the public to exercise extreme caution when meeting individuals from social media platforms. We are appealing to anyone who may have fallen victim to this suspect, or anyone with information regarding his current whereabouts, to come forward,” the police said.

Members of the public are advised to contact Detective Constable Jessica Du Preez of the Mangaung Family Violence, Child Protection and Sexual Offences unit at 082 527 7287 or call SAPS Crime Stop at 08600 10111 or leave an anonymous tip-off on the MySAPS App.

All information received will be treated with the strictest confidentiality. – SAnews.gov.za

Edwin

64 views

Have your say on draft Cannabis Regulations 

Source: Government of South Africa

Have your say on draft Cannabis Regulations 

The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (DJCOD) has called for public comments on the draft regulations in terms of the Cannabis for Private Purposes Act, 2024.

“Copies of the draft regulations are available on the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development website and in the Government Gazette. Members of the public and interested stakeholders are invited to submit written comments to the Department by 5 March 2026.

“All submissions received will be carefully considered before the regulations are finalised. Once finalised, the proposed limits will be submitted to Parliament for approval prior to coming into effect,” the DJCOD said on Tuesday.

The department explained that the draft regulations propose the “upper limits for the possession and cultivation of cannabis for private use and form part of the ongoing process to implement the Act”.

“In developing the draft regulations, the Minister considered a range of factors, including what may reasonably constitute private use, the number of cannabis plants required to support such use, and relevant international benchmarks.

“The draft regulations also set out administrative and technical processes relating to the expungement of qualifying criminal records,” the DJCOD said.

Constitutional question

Some eight years ago, the Constitutional Court delivered a judgement which found that it is not reasonable and justifiable to criminalise the private use of cannabis by an adult in “an open and democratic society founded on human dignity, equality, and freedom”.

The court also declared that the relevant legislative provisions related to this were constitutionally invalid and South Africa’s law-making body, Parliament, was ordered to effect the necessary amendments.

Subsequently, Parliament gave effect to the judgement by enacting the Cannabis for Private Purposes Act, 2024.

“The Act provides a regulatory framework for the use, possession, cultivation and transportation of cannabis for private purposes and makes provision for the expungement of criminal records for persons previously convicted of certain cannabis-related offences.

“While the Constitutional Court did not prescribe specific limits on the quantity of cannabis that may be possessed or cultivated for private use, it left this determination to Parliament,” the department explained.

The judgement by the Constitutional Court paved the way for decriminalisation of the use or possession of cannabis for private use by adults.

Scope 

However, this does not extend to the buying or selling of cannabis.

“Matters relating to the commercial cultivation, buying or selling of cannabis or cannabis products, as well as the recognition of traditional growers, fall outside the scope of the Act and are being addressed by other government departments, including those responsible for Trade, Industry and Competition, Agriculture, and Health,” the department said.

The judgement also does not extend to persons who are under the age of 18.

“The use of cannabis by children remains prohibited, primarily due to medical concerns regarding its impact on the developing brain.

“While the Constitutional Court found in the Centre for Child Law v Director of Public Prosecutions, Johannesburg (CCT 210/21) judgement that criminalising a child for the use or possession of cannabis was not in the child’s best interests, the Act places clear responsibility on adults and criminalises conduct where an adult permits a child to use or possess cannabis or supplies cannabis to a child.

“The draft regulations and the Cannabis for Private Purposes Act are confined to implementing the Constitutional Court decision on the private use of cannabis,” the department emphasised. – SAnews.gov.za

 

NeoB

56 views

Kruger National Park restores infrastructure

Source: Government of South Africa

Kruger National Park restores infrastructure

Restoration work is underway in the Kruger National Park following the flood damage sustained last month, says the South African National Parks (SANParks).

The floods caused extensive damage to roads, bridges, tourism facilities, and staff living quarters. 

The park’s H7 Route (Orpen Gate to Satara) is now open to traffic.

“Due to significant flood damage at Nsemani Dam Area, only one lane is currently accessible. Motorists are urged to exercise extreme caution when passing through this section. Heavy vehicles exceeding eight tonnes are not permitted.

“SANParks is constructing a bypass via the S12 and S40 routes. This bypass will serve as an alternative route during dam repairs and reconstruction, ensuring continued accessibility,” SANParks said.

Furthermore, Tsendze Rustic Camp (near Mopani Rest Camp), Masorini Ruins – a Late Iron Age Site (12kms from Phalaborwa Gate) as well as Mooiplaas (near Mopani Rest Camp) and Babalala (between Punda Maria and Shingwedzi Camps) picnic sites are open as of Monday, 2 February 2026.

Guests are reminded that gravel roads marked with “No Entry” signs must not be accessed under any circumstances. 

Orpen Gate is now accessible for Open Safari Vehicles (OSVs). A quota system will apply to manage traffic flow and ensure visitor safety.

“SANParks acknowledges the inconvenience caused by the floods and appreciates the patience and cooperation of visitors during this period. Our teams are working tirelessly to restore infrastructure and ensure that Kruger National Park remains a safe and enjoyable destination for all.” –SAnews.gov.za

 

 

nosihle

41 views

Minister of State for International Cooperation Meets Head of Syrian Planning and Statistics Authority

Source: Government of Qatar

Doha | February 4, 2026

HE Minister of State for International Cooperation Dr. Maryam bint Ali bin Nasser Al Misnad meets on Wednesday with HE Head of the Planning and Statistics Authority in the sisterly Syrian Arab Republic Anas Salim, who is currently visiting the country.

During the meeting, the two sides discuss cooperation relations between the two countries and ways to support and strengthen them, particularly in the humanitarian fields, as well as early recovery and reconstruction projects. The meeting also addresses a number of issues of common interest.

Temporary lane closures on the R21

Source: Government of South Africa

Temporary lane closures on the R21

The South African National Roads Agency SOC Limited (SANRAL) has advised road users of the temporary lane closure of the two fast lanes on the National Road R21, Section 2 Northbound (km 0.3), at Olifantsfontein.

The lane closure is due to the rehabilitation of a sinkhole and will end on 30 April 2026. 

These closures are necessary to facilitate the rehabilitation and road repair thereafter.

“We advise road users to plan their trips accordingly during this essential sinkhole rehabilitation, adhere to the traffic accommodation signage and the flag persons advanced warnings. 

“It is not only for your own safety but also that of the construction personnel on site. SANRAL apologises for any inconvenience caused and the roads agency remains committed to improving the safety and quality of our national roads,” SANRAL’s Gauteng Provincial Head Progress Hlahla said. –SAnews.gov.za

nosihle

49 views

Gauteng Education engages scholar transport providers 

Source: Government of South Africa

Gauteng Education engages scholar transport providers 

The Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) has acknowledged challenges currently affecting the province’s Scholar Transport Programme which has resulted in some service providers halting operations and negatively affecting learners.

The halting of operations on Monday also contributed to low attendance at some schools.

The department said it has been actively engaging scholar transport service providers to address outstanding payments and has emphasised its commitment to fulfilling payments of all outstanding invoices.

In a statement on Tuesday, the GDE appealed to service providers to ensure the continuous and uninterrupted transportation of learners under the programme while it works within available financial processes to finalise payments accordingly.

While the matter is being resolved, the department has advised schools to implement appropriate academic recovery measures to ensure that teaching and learning remains on track.

Gauteng Education MEC Matome Chiloane emphasised that the safety of learners remains a priority. 

“Indeed, safety, access, and well-being of learners remain a priority. We will continue to engage all affected stakeholders and resolve the impasse, and we are confident that these engagements and commitments will enable operators to resume services. 

“We remain committed to collaboration and constructive engagements with our stakeholders in resolving any matters that may arise. To this end, we encourage all our stakeholders to always engage with us on issues they face within the sector,” Chiloane said. – SAnews.gov.za

 

DikelediM

50 views

Les tribunaux jouent un rôle croissant dans la lutte pour mettre fin aux mutilations génitales féminines, selon une nouvelle étude

Source: Africa Press Organisation – French

Les tribunaux s’imposent comme un front essentiel dans la lutte visant à mettre fin aux mutilations génitales féminines (MGF). Au cours des deux dernières décennies, la reconnaissance internationale des MGF comme une violation des droits humains s’est renforcée, parallèlement à une évolution vers des interdictions pénales. Un nouveau rapport d’Equality Now (www.EqualityNow.org) – avec un appui à la recherche juridique facilité par le service mondial pro bono de la Thomson Reuters Foundation, TrustLaw – montre comment les défenseur·e·s des droits des femmes et les survivantes des MGF recourent de plus en plus au contentieux stratégique pour renforcer l’application des lois, combler les lacunes juridiques et protéger des avancées durement acquises contre tout recul.

En route vers la justice : Difficultés rencontrées et occasions à saisir au niveau mondial lors des litiges relatifs aux mutilations génitales féminines (https://apo-opa.co/4rzdxio) présente des enseignements issus de contentieux stratégiques au Burkina Faso, aux États-Unis, en Gambie, en Inde, au Kenya et au Libériaet. Le rapport analyse également les obstacles à l’accès à la justice dans dix pays : l’Australie, le Burkina Faso, l’Égypte, les États-Unis, la France, le Kenya, le Libéria, l’Ouganda, la Sierra Leone et le Royaume-Uni..

Divya Srinivasan, d’Equality Now, explique : “En examinant le fonctionnement du droit dans la pratique, nous pouvons mieux comprendre comment l’utiliser efficacement. Notre étude montre que le contentieux stratégique est l’un des moyens les plus puissants de combattre les MGF en mettant en évidence les lacunes de protection, en établissant des précédents juridiques et en entraînant des réformes plus larges. Mais le contentieux, à lui seul, ne suffit pas. Pour rendre une justice réelle et obtenir un changement durable, il doit être soutenu par une application des lois bien mise en œuvre et suffisamment financée, ainsi que par des systèmes juridiques qui protègent les survivantes de tout préjudice.”

Les mutilations génitales féminines sont un problème mondial

Les MGF sont internationalement reconnues comme une grave violation des droits humains consistant en l’ablation partielle ou totale des organes génitaux externes féminins pour des raisons non médicales. Cette pratique est associée à des conséquences physiques et psychologiques graves, et trouve son origine dans l’inégalité de genre.

L’UNICEF estime que 230 millions de femmes et de filles (https://apo-opa.co/45HcAMs) sont touchées par les MGF dans le monde. Equality Now et ses partenaires ont rassemblé des preuves de MGF dans 94 pays (https://apo-opa.co/4qhwrZV); cependant, parmi eux, seuls 59 disposent d’une loi spécifique interdisant cette pratique, et des améliorations substantielles sont nécessaires pour garantir un meilleur accès à la justice et un soutien accru aux survivantes.

Le contentieux stratégique peut renforcer l’accès à la justice pour les survivantes des MGF

Les actions stratégiques au pénal, au civil et au constitutionnel peuvent renforcer la réponse des États face aux MGF en révélant des défaillances systémiques et en clarifiant le droit, en établissant des précédents et en stimulant des réformes juridiques et politiques dont l’impact dépasse les affaires individuelles.

Le contentieux stratégique peut permettre aux survivantes de prendre la parole et de demander réparation. Les poursuites très médiatisées sensibilisent le public au fait que les MGF constituent une forme de violence à l’égard des femmes et des filles socialement et légalement inacceptable. D’autres survivantes sont encouragées à se manifester, et des conversations essentielles s’ouvrent au sein des communautés concernées, contribuant à un changement social qui prévient de futurs préjudices.

Surtout, le contentieux stratégique peut contraindre les États à respecter leurs obligations en matière de droits humains pour protéger les femmes et les filles, notamment lorsque les protections nationales sont faibles ou que la volonté politique s’est essoufflée. Il soutient également le plaidoyer de la société civile en la dotant d’outils juridiques et de décisions judiciaires faisant autorité, qui facilitent les campagnes, le travail de prévention et la responsabilisation en matière de MGF.

Un exemple d’obligations étatiques clarifiées en droit constitutionnel et international est la décision rendue en 2025 par la Cour de justice de la Communauté économique des États de l’Afrique de l’Ouest (CEDEAO) contre la Sierra Leone, où les MGF restent très répandues. Le jugement a précisé les obligations juridiques contraignantes de la Sierra Leone, l’appelant à criminaliser les MGF, à adopter des mesures pour prévenir et interdire la pratique, à protéger les personnes à risque, à indemniser les survivantes, à enquêter sur les affaires et à poursuivre les auteur·e·s.

Défendre les protections juridiques contre les MGF face aux risques de recul

Le contentieux stratégique peut être crucial pour empêcher un recul des protections juridiques. Au Kenya, une action judiciaire coordonnée a permis de défendre la loi sur l’interdiction des mutilations génitales féminines après une contestation constitutionnelle cherchant à légitimer la pratique en la présentant comme une question de consentement, de culture et d’autonomie corporelle. La décision de la Haute Cour en 2021 a préservé l’une des lois anti-MGF les plus fortes d’Afrique et a réaffirmé que de tels arguments ne peuvent primer sur les droits des femmes et des filles.

Des arguments similaires sont désormais mis à l’épreuve en Gambie. Après que les législateur·rice·s ont rejeté, en 2024, un projet de loi visant à abroger l’interdiction des MGF, la loi fait maintenant l’objet d’une contestation devant la Cour suprême sur des bases constitutionnelles. Si la Cour statue en faveur de l’abrogation, cela créerait un précédent dangereux en faisant passer des droits religieux ou culturels avant les droits humains fondamentaux à l’égalité, à la dignité et à la liberté de vivre à l’abri de la violence. Une telle décision pourrait affaiblir les protections des femmes et des filles en Gambie et encourager des tentatives de recul des lois anti-MGF ailleurs.

Lacunes juridiques et défaillances systémiques dans les poursuites liées aux MGF

Malgré le nombre de pays dotés de lois anti-MGF, les poursuites restent rares : une application insuffisante des lois et des failles juridiques compromet la capacité de porter des affaires devant les tribunaux. Les signalements de MGF sont faibles, en partie en raison de la stigmatisation, de la peur et d’une protection insuffisante des victimes et des témoins. D’autres préoccupations incluent des enquêtes de mauvaise qualité, des preuves mal gérées et une priorité politique ou institutionnelle limitée accordée aux affaires de MGF.

Ces faiblesses sont aggravées par des retards dans les enquêtes et les procédures, ainsi que par des démarches judiciaires difficiles d’accès. Pour les rares affaires qui parviennent au tribunal, la justice est loin d’être garantie et, dans certains cas, des peines incohérentes ou clémentes ne reflètent pas la gravité des préjudices causés.

Les survivantes subissent souvent stigmatisation, intimidation, discrimination et reviviscences traumatiques pendant les procédures. Dans certains contextes, l’absence d’approches centrées sur les survivantes a contribué à ce que celles-ci soient elles-mêmes criminalisées en vertu des lois censées les protéger.

Les juges, procureur·e·s, policiers, professionnel·le·s de santé et services sociaux manquent souvent de formation adéquate sur les MGF et les cadres juridiques pertinents. Ce manque de compréhension conduit à un traitement inadéquat des dossiers et à une application incorrecte des lois.

La mauvaise exécution des décisions de justice permet aux auteur·e·s d’échapper à de véritables conséquences malgré une condamnation. Cela sape la crédibilité du système judiciaire, entretient un schéma plus large d’impunité et dissuade les survivantes d’engager une action en justice.

Une approche multisectorielle pour mettre fin aux MGF

Les gouvernements doivent renforcer et clarifier les lois afin de garantir que toutes les formes de MGF soient explicitement interdites et que la législation existante soit effectivement appliquée. Cela inclut la conduite d’enquêtes efficaces, des peines reflétant la gravité du crime et l’exécution cohérente des décisions de justice. Des investissements ciblés dans la formation professionnelle sont nécessaires pour améliorer la gestion des preuves, le suivi des dossiers et des réponses sensibles aux besoins des survivantes.

Les lois sont plus efficaces lorsqu’elles s’accompagnent d’efforts de prévention qui s’attaquent aux causes profondes des MGF. Mettre fin à cette pratique préjudiciable exige une approche multisectorielle combinant action juridique et réponses dans les domaines de la santé, de l’éducation, de la protection de l’enfance et de l’action communautaire.

Le sous-financement compromet la mise en œuvre des lois relatives aux MGF. Des investissements publics durables, des actions de sensibilisation et l’engagement des communautés sont essentiels. Les survivantes doivent avoir accès à une aide juridictionnelle gratuite et à des services de soutien. Des recours civils doivent également être garantis, permettant aux personnes de demander une indemnisation, des ordonnances de protection ou d’autres formes de réparation devant les juridictions civiles, indépendamment des procédures pénales.

Kathryn Beck, responsable juridique de TrustLaw à la Thomson Reuters Foundation, a commenté : “Le soutien juridique pro bono possède un pouvoir unique pour appuyer les missions essentielles d’organisations telles qu’Equality Now. Nous espérons que cet important rapport jettera les bases pour renforcer les lois anti-MGF et donnera les moyens d’agir aux professionnel·le·s de terrain qui travaillent à protéger les droits des femmes et des filles dans le monde entier.”

“Le soutien juridique pro bono possède un pouvoir unique pour appuyer les missions essentielles d’organisations telles qu’Equality Now. Nous espérons que cet important rapport jettera les bases pour renforcer les lois anti-MGF et donnera les moyens d’agir aux professionnel·le·s de terrain qui travaillent à protéger les droits des femmes et des filles dans le monde entier.”

Distribué par APO Group pour Equality Now.

Notes aux rédactions :
Pour les demandes médias, contactez
Tara Carey
Responsable mondiale des médias
Tcarey@equalitynow.org
+44 (0)7971556340 (WhatsApp)

Aakasha Saxena
Chargée de communication
asaxena@equalitynow.org.

À propos Equality Now​ :
Equality Now est une organisation mondiale de défense des droits humains qui se consacre à provoquer les changements juridiques et systémiques nécessaires pour mettre fin à la discrimination envers toutes les femmes et les filles, partout dans le monde. Depuis sa création en 1992, elle a joué un rôle dans la réforme de 130 lois discriminatoires dans le monde, influençant positivement la vie de centaines de millions de femmes et de filles, de leurs communautés et de leurs nations, à l’heure actuelle et pour les générations à venir.

Travaillant avec des partenaires aux niveaux national, régional et mondial, Equality Now s’appuie sur une expertise juridique approfondie et sur un large éventail de perspectives sociales, politiques et culturelles pour continuer à montrer la voie en orientant, en façonnant et en favorisant les changements nécessaires pour parvenir à une égalité des sexes durable, dans l’intérêt de toutes et tous.

Pour plus de détails, rendez-vous sur www.EqualityNow.org et sur LinkedIn (Equality Now). Pour plus d’informations sur les MGF dans le monde, veuillez consulter notre rapport 2025, Le moment est venu : Mettons fin aux mutilations génitales féminines/l’excision (MGF/E).

À propos La Fondation Thomson Reuters​ :
La Fondation Thomson Reuters est la fondation d’entreprise de Thomson Reuters, la société mondiale de services d’actualités et d’information. En tant qu’organisation caritative indépendante, enregistrée au Royaume-Uni et aux États-Unis, nous mettons à profit notre expertise dans les domaines des médias, du droit et des données pour renforcer le journalisme indépendant, permettre l’accès au droit et promouvoir les entreprises responsables. Grâce à l’actualité, au développement des médias, à l’assistance juridique gratuite et à l’intelligence des données, nous visons à bâtir des sociétés libres, équitables et informées.

TrustLaw, une initiative de la Fondation Thomson Reuters, est le plus grand réseau juridique pro bono au monde. En collaboration avec des cabinets d’avocats et des équipes juridiques d’entreprise de premier plan, nous offrons une assistance juridique gratuite ainsi que des recherches et ressources juridiques novatrices aux organisations à but non lucratif, aux médias indépendants et aux entreprises sociales dans plus de 190 pays. En diffusant la pratique des services pro bono dans le monde entier, TrustLaw souhaite renforcer la société civile et favoriser le changement. Pour plus de détails, rendez-vous sur www.Trust.org et sur LinkedIn (Thomson Reuters Foundation).

Media files

National Minimum Wage to rise to R30.23 per hour from March 

Source: Government of South Africa

National Minimum Wage to rise to R30.23 per hour from March 

Employment and Labour Minister Nomakhosazana Meth has announced an increase in the statutory National Minimum Wage (NMW) for 2026, raising it from R28.79 to R30.23 for each ordinary hour worked.

“The 1st of March 2026 is the date on which this amendment shall become binding. The R1.44 upward adjustment will benefit all workers, including vulnerable farm workers and domestic workers,” the Minister said in a statement on Tuesday. 

Excluded from the NMW increase are workers employed under the Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP). Due to EPWP workers being employed under a special dispensation, their adjustment will rise from R15.16 per hour to a minimum wage of R16.62 per hour. 

Workers who have concluded learnership agreements contemplated in section 17 of the Skills Development Act, 1998 (Act No. 97 of 1998), are entitled to the allowances contained in Schedule 2. The rates on learnerships will be published on the departmental website.

The National Minimum Wage is South Africa’s labour market statutory requirement. The National Minimum Wage Act came into effect in 2019. In terms of the legislation, employers are obligated to pay workers a minimum amount per hour, and the NMW is subject to an annual review.

Any violations of the Act are subject to fines enforced by the inspectorate. The wage is enforced by the Department of Employment and Labour and the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA).

“The NMW is the floor which an employer is legally obligated to remunerate employees for work done. No employee shall be paid below the National Minimum Wage. It cannot be varied by contract, collective agreement or law; and it is also an unfair labour practice for an employer to unilaterally alter hours of work or other conditions of employment in implementing the NMW,” the department said in a statement on Tuesday. 

In terms of the latest NMW adjustments, the rates in the Sectoral Determination for areas and rates, work categories for the Contract Cleaning Sector, as well as those of the Wholesale and Retail Sector, are also made available on the departmental website (www.labour.gov.za).

The NMW Act applies to all workers and their employers except members of the South African National Defence Force, the National Intelligence Agency and the South African Secret Service.

It also does not apply to a volunteer who is a person who performs work for another person and who does not receive, or is not entitled to receive, any remuneration for his or her service.

The National Minimum Wage does not include allowances such as transport, tools, food or accommodation, payments in kind (board or lodging), tips, bonuses and gifts, among others. – SAnews.gov.za

 

DikelediM

89 views

Courts are playing a growing role in ending female genital mutilation, new research finds

Source: APO

Courts are emerging as a critical frontline in the fight to end female genital mutilation (FGM). Over the past two decades, international recognition of FGM as a human rights violation has grown, alongside a shift toward criminal bans. A new report by Equality Now (www.EqualityNow.org) – with legal research support facilitated through the Thomson Reuters Foundation’s global pro bono service, TrustLaw – reveals how women’s rights advocates and FGM survivors are increasingly using strategic litigation to strengthen implementation of laws, close legal gaps, and defend hard-won protections from rollback.

Towards Justice: Global Challenges and Opportunities in Litigating Cases of Female Genital Mutilation (https://apo-opa.co/4rzdxio), outlines lessons from strategic litigation in Burkina Faso, India, Kenya, Liberia, The Gambia, and the United States. The report also analyses barriers to justice in ten countries: Australia, Burkina Faso, Egypt, France, Kenya, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Uganda, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Equality Now’s Divya Srinivasan explains, “By examining how the law works in practice, we can better understand how to harness it effectively. Our research finds that strategic litigation is one of the most powerful ways to challenge FGM by exposing gaps in protection, setting legal precedents, and driving wider reform. But litigation alone is not enough. To deliver real justice and lasting change, it must be backed by well-implemented, sufficiently funded enforcement of laws alongside legal systems that shield survivors from harm.”

Female genital mutilation is a global problem

FGM is internationally recognised as a serious human rights violation involving the partial or complete removal of external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. The practice is associated with severe physical and psychological problems, and stems from gender inequality.

UNICEF estimates that 230 million women and girls (https://apo-opa.co/4asXCw6) are impacted by FGM globally. Equality Now and its partners have collated evidence of FGM in 94 countries (https://apo-opa.co/4qhwrZV), but of these, only 59 have a specific law prohibiting the practice, and considerable improvement is needed to ensure better access to justice and support for survivors.

Strategic litigation can strengthen access to justice for FGM survivors

Strategic criminal, civil, and constitutional litigation can strengthen state responses to FGM by exposing systemic failures and clarifying the law, setting legal precedents, and driving legal and policy reforms that have an impact beyond individual cases.

Strategic litigation can empower survivors to speak out and seek remedies. High-profile prosecutions raise public awareness that FGM is a socially and legally unacceptable form of violence against women and girls. Other survivors are encouraged to come forward, and critical conversations are sparked within affected communities, helping drive social change that prevents future harm.

Crucially, strategic litigation can compel States to uphold their human rights obligations to protect women and girls, particularly where national protections are weak or political will has faltered. It also assists civil society advocacy efforts by equipping them with legal instruments and authoritative court rulings that facilitate campaigning, prevention work, and accountability for FGM.

An illustration of a country’s obligations being clarified under constitutional and international law is the 2025 ruling by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Court against Sierra Leone, where FGM remains widespread. The judgment specified Sierra Leone’s binding legal duties, calling on the country to criminalise FGM, adopt measures to prevent and prohibit the practice, protect those at risk, compensate survivors, investigate cases, and prosecute perpetrators.

Defending FGM legal protections against rollback

Strategic litigation can be critical in preventing rollback of legal protections. In Kenya, coordinated legal action successfully defended the Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act after a constitutional challenge sought to legitimise the practice by framing it as a matter of consent, culture, and bodily autonomy. The High Court’s 2021 ruling preserved one of the strongest anti-FGM laws in Africa and reaffirmed that such arguments cannot override the rights of women and girls.

Similar arguments are now being tested in The Gambia. After lawmakers rejected a bill in 2024 seeking to repeal the ban on FGM, the law is now being challenged before the Supreme Court on constitutional grounds. If the Court rules in favour of repeal, it would set a dangerous precedent by prioritising religious or cultural rights above the fundamental human rights to equality, dignity, and freedom from violence. Such a decision could weaken protections for women and girls in The Gambia and embolden efforts to roll back anti-FGM laws elsewhere.

Legal gaps and systemic failures in prosecuting FGM

Despite the number of countries with anti-FGM laws, prosecution for FGM remains rare, with weak enforcement of laws and legal loopholes undermining the ability to bring cases to court. Reporting of FGM is low, partly due to stigma, fear, and weak victim and witness protection. Other concerns include poor investigations, mishandled evidence, and limited political or institutional prioritisation of FGM cases.

These shortcomings are compounded by delays in investigations and court proceedings, alongside inaccessible court processes. For the few cases that do make it to court, justice is far from guaranteed, and in some instances, inconsistent or lenient sentencing fails to reflect the seriousness of the harm caused.

Survivors often experience stigma, intimidation, discrimination, and re-traumatisation during court proceedings. In some contexts, a lack of survivor-centred approaches has contributed to survivors themselves being criminalised under the very laws meant to protect them.

Judges, prosecutors, police, healthcare professionals, and social services often lack adequate training on FGM and relevant legal frameworks. This lack of understanding contributes to cases being poorly handled and laws being incorrectly applied.

Poor enforcement of court decisions allows perpetrators to avoid meaningful consequences despite conviction. This undermines the credibility of the justice system, contributes to a broader pattern of impunity, and discourages survivors from pursuing legal action.

A multi-sectoral approach to ending FGM

Governments must strengthen and clarify laws to ensure that all forms of FGM are explicitly prohibited and existing legislation is well enforced. This includes pursuing investigations effectively, ensuring sentencing reflects the gravity of the crime, and enforcing court rulings consistently. Targeted investment in professional training is needed to improve evidence handling, case management, and survivor-sensitive responses.

Laws work best when paired with prevention efforts that address the root causes of FGM. Ending this harmful practice requires a multi-sectoral approach that combines legal action with health, education, child protection, and community-based responses.

Underfunding undermines efforts to implement FGM laws. Sustained public investment, awareness-raising, and community engagement are essential. Survivors need access to free legal aid and support services. Civil remedies must also be guaranteed, allowing individuals to seek compensation, protection orders, or other forms of redress through the civil courts, independent of criminal proceedings.

Kathryn Beck, Head of Legal for TrustLaw at the Thomson Reuters Foundation, commented, “Legal pro bono has a unique power to support the critical missions of organisations such as Equality Now. We hope that this important report lays the groundwork to strengthen anti-FGM laws and empowers frontline professionals working to protect the rights of women and girls around the world.”

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Equality Now.

Notes to editors:
For media enquired contact
Tara Carey
Global Head of Media
Tcarey@equalitynow.org
+44 (0)7971556340 (WhatsApp)

Aakasha Saxena
Communications Officer
asaxena@equalitynow.org

About Equality Now​:
Equality Now is a worldwide human rights organisation dedicated to securing the legal and systemic change needed to end discrimination against all women and girls. Since its inception in 1992, it has played a role in reforming 120 discriminatory laws globally, positively impacting the lives of hundreds of millions of women and girls, their communities and nations, both now and for generations to come.

Working with partners at national, regional and global levels, Equality Now draws on deep legal expertise and a diverse range of social, political and cultural perspectives to continue to lead the way in steering, shaping and driving the change needed to achieve enduring gender equality, to the benefit of all. For more details, go to www.EqualityNow.org and LinkedIn Equality Now. For more information about FGM around the world, please see our 2025 report, The Time Is Now: End Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting, An Urgent Need for a Global Response – Five Year Update (https://apo-opa.co/3ZcTlqn).

About The Thomson Reuters Foundation​:
The Thomson Reuters Foundation is the corporate foundation of Thomson Reuters, using its expertise in media, law, and data to advance free, fair, and informed societies. Through journalism, legal support, and research, the Foundation works to uphold human rights, foster transparency, and promote inclusive economies.

Its global pro bono service, TrustLaw, is the world’s largest network of legal professionals providing free legal assistance to NGOs, social enterprises, and independent media in over 190 countries. By facilitating access to legal support and producing pioneering legal research, TrustLaw helps strengthen civil society and drive systemic, lasting change. For details, go to www.Trust.org, LinkedIn Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Media files

.