AI in nature conservation: powerful tool or dangerous shortcut?

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Jeran Cloete, PhD Candidate in Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University

Conservationists analyse overwhelming volumes of ecological data in their work. For example, they might need to process decades of weather data or the movements of millions of insects. Up until now, these scientists and decision makers have had to manually find and sort information, then use statistical tools which often oversimplify the source information.

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools now promise to help with all that. But can they deliver on the promise?

They are far from perfect. It’s been shown that they can confidently make up information and amplify hidden biases in their training data. And different AI tools have different uses, strengths and weaknesses. They need to be chosen carefully.

AI featured among the top 10 emerging issues in biodiversity conservation in South Africa in a recent horizon scan that we undertook. As part of a group of 14 experts in biodiversity conservation, we drew on discussions within our diverse professional networks, literature and news trends to identify issues likely to emerge and intensify over the next 5-10 years.

The issues fell into three main groups: technological disruption; regulatory complexity; and infrastructure impacts.

Among them, AI featured as both an opportunity and a risk for future biodiversity conservation.

AI opportunities

Our scan brought to the surface the power and pitfalls of AI in the kind of work we do.

One potential use of AI is in tracking. Tracking animals and insects at scale is essential for conservation decisions. Birds and whales migrate across the planet every year, and insect numbers change through the seasons in the billions. Image recognition AI can process camera trap data to help populate databases such as Wildlife Insights and provide information about animal behaviour to help predict the impacts of global processes like climate change and industrial development on biodiversity.

Mass monitoring also records people sharing those landscapes with animals. This surveillance can be used to detect illegal wildlife harvesting (poaching) or avoid human-animal conflict.

Land use is another area of conservation where AI offers opportunities. Using economic data together with landscape information, custom AI models can be trained to predict deforestation, allowing preventive action, or choose land with high conservation value for the best price.

Ecosystem complexity needs to be summarised and condensed into maps and categories to inform broad landscape-level decisions. Using AI increases the amount of data that can be summarised.

Chatbots are one kind of AI tool that can distil information from huge amounts of text. For example, they can be used to monitor product listings and detect illegal wildlife trade online the moment it occurs. They can read hundreds of scientific publications to help decide which species are at risk of extinction. They can draw on many different sources to create environmental impact assessments; the basis of land development decisions, offering a tempting shortcut around a time-consuming reporting task.

But we also identified downsides and risks.

The risks

Local communities living off the land might experience the mass surveillance as an intrusion. Alienation of local communities in this way could cause them to oppose conservation governance and sabotage technology in the field to protect their privacy.

Another challenge is that the technology itself has limitations. Using AI for tracking animals means specially training image and audio identification systems to work with each ecosystem and piece of hardware. An AI model is only as good as the effort that was put into teaching it. For example, training a model on recordings from a city might cause it to “hear” pigeons everywhere, producing a confident but incomplete list of birds from natural area data.

Another worry about AI is that replacing human involvement could lead to job losses. When used for animal identification, it could contribute to an ongoing decline in taxonomy knowledge which is more severe in biodiversity-rich, low-income countries in Africa. That knowledge is essential for improving and correcting AI systems.


Read more: Counting Uganda’s lions: we found that wildlife rangers do a better job than machines


We also found reasons for concern in land use applications.

The risk is that using AI tools for map making could disconnect the map from reality on the ground by replacing human judgment in the field and favouring data sources compatible with AI methods. A skilled ecologist surveying an ecosystem will notice unexpected things that were not specified during the planning stage. For example, speaking with local people may reveal planned farming expansion or harvesting wildlife activities. An AI system would miss this critical context because it can only read information that has been digitised.

AI can’t see animals that evade cameras or identify animals that were not expected to occur in that location (images that it was not trained on). It also can’t speak to humans to discover their intentions or uncover ecological wisdom passed down from their ancestors.


Read more: First fossil hyena tracks found in South Africa – how expert animal trackers helped


Chatbots too need to be used with caution. They can generate or embed fictional information. Even when drawing on real information, they often reflect bias in their training data, favouring research and perspectives from well-represented institutions in the global north, where publications have historically been dominated by men in high-income universities.

Uncritical use of chatbot-generated recommendations could lead to poor environmental decisions. For example, it might suggest planting trees without considering diverse ecosystems like Africa’s savannah grasslands.

Using chatbots as a shortcut to summarise knowledge and inform conservation decisions in Africa will reinforce colonial systems and marginalise indigenous communities and knowledge.

Careful use of AI

Strong regulation of the use of AI in environmental science is therefore a moral and legal imperative. The sector needs clear safeguards, standards and oversight mechanisms to prevent faulty or inappropriate AI outputs from influencing decisions. It needs:

  • validation protocols to catch fabricated information

  • limitations to prevent chatbots from overriding human knowledge and perspectives

  • mandatory disclosure of AI prompt histories

  • standards for describing training datasets so that appropriate models can be selected.

The explosion of AI presents a powerful opportunity for conservation if we use the right tools with care. If we replace human judgment with unchecked automation, we risk becoming tools of the very systems we built.

– AI in nature conservation: powerful tool or dangerous shortcut?
– https://theconversation.com/ai-in-nature-conservation-powerful-tool-or-dangerous-shortcut-283718

Rationalisation of the courts a move to secure access for all

Source: Government of South Africa

Rationalisation of the courts a move to secure access for all

Government is moving to improve access to justice for all with the implementation of the rationalisation of the courts.

Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi briefed the media on Tuesday on the department’s plans to ensure that the courts better serve communities.

“An independent judiciary and a well-functioning court system that gives full effect to the right to justice for all is the cornerstone of our democracy.

“Though significant progress has been made, post 1994, in configuring the court system in a way that increases access to justice for all, the court system that existed in South Africa prior to the democratic transition was left largely intact.

“As a result, the legacy of colonialism and apartheid continues to plague South Africa with spatial injustices and to impede access to courts for communities that reside in the areas that formed part of the defunct homelands and self-governing territories, as well as remote rural villages,” the Minister said.

To remedy this, the Interim Rationalisation of Jurisdiction of the High Court’s Act of 2001 introduced minimum changes and in 2014, the department commenced with the implementation of the rationalisation of Magisterial Districts in the provinces.

Furthermore in 2021, then Justice Minister Ronald Lamola, established a Committee on The Rationalisation of the Areas under the Jurisdiction and Judicial Establishments of the Divisions of the High Court of South Africa chaired by retired Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke.

“In essence, the committee was established to identify key elements of the current structure of our high courts that need to be changed with a view to ‘establishing a judicial system suited to the requirements of the Constitution’.

“The Rationalisation Committee’s report was completed in two phases, each with own recommendations,” she explained.

Kubayi noted that Cabinet has now approved the committee’s report and implementation which will be done in two phases.

The first phase includes:
•    Implementation of the immediate recommendations of the Rationalisation Committee, which entails, recommendations regarding the Magisterial Districts and Sub-Districts in respect of which the Main and Local Seats of the respective Divisions of the High Court shall exercise jurisdiction, with the view to enhance access to justice, recommended by the Rationalisation Committee.

•    With regards to local seats, Phase 1 of the implementation will entail gazetting and the usage of courts where infrastructure is already available, this comes into effect by 1 July 2026.

“The review of the guidelines for the appointment of Acting Judges has been completed. The final draft of the guidelines have been signed off by the Chief Justice and they will be gazetted for implementation and also comes into effect from 1st July 2026.

“A process has been initiated with National Treasury and Office of the Chief Justice to effect the 20% increase of the judicial posts to deal with the capacity challenges across the Divisions of the High Court, as recommended by the Rationalisation Committee,” Kubayi said.

Phase two of the implementation includes:
•    A phased-in approach for implementation of the recommendations of the Rationalisation Committee regarding the establishment of additional local seats which entails the establishment of additional local seats through the building of new courts or expansion of the existing magistrates’ courts.

The expansion will include the Gauteng Division at Palm Ridge, Free State Division at Welkom, North West Division at Rustenburg, Northern Cape Division at Upington and the Western Cape Division at Thembalethu.

“After consultations with the Gauteng Judge President, Judge [Aubrey] Ledwaba, and other relevant stakeholders, we have agreed and initiated steps to establish a court in Kempton Park, next to OR Tambo airport.

“Though this initiative is not part of the recommendations of the rationalisation committee, we believe that the circumstances especially regarding immigration demand that we act swiftly to create the necessary infrastructure and justice systems to attend to this important matter,” Kubayi added.

The recommendation to move the seat of the Eastern Cape Division from Makhanda to Bhisho is currently still under consultation with stakeholders.

“As we celebrate the 30-year anniversary of the adoption of the Constitution, we must intensify our efforts to achieve the constitutional imperative with regards to rationalisation of Magisterial Districts and Divisions of the High Court.

“As we move with consolidation of court administration and judicial governance, merging magistrates and judges into a single judiciary to enhance independence we must also ensure that Access to justice for all remains at the centre of our efforts,” Kubayi concluded. – SAnews.gov.za

 

NeoB

0

SAPS suspends additional five senior police officers

Source: Government of South Africa

SAPS suspends additional five senior police officers

The South African Police Service (SAPS) has confirmed the suspension of five additional senior officers in relation to matters arising from the Medicare 24 tender.

“Internal departmental processes are underway, and in the interest of preserving the integrity of these processes, the SAPS will not provide further comment at this stage,” SAPS said in a statement.

Earlier this month, SAPS suspended nine police officers, who served as members of the Bid Evaluation Committee (BEC) in relation to the Medicare24 tender process.

The affected members have been placed on suspension pending the finalisation of disciplinary and related investigations. 

“SAPS remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity, transparency and ethical conduct in all its operations,” SAPS said at the time. – SAnews.gov.za 

Edwin

0

Aircraft maintenance academy opens aviation careers to underserved communities’ youth

Source: Government of South Africa

Aircraft maintenance academy opens aviation careers to underserved communities’ youth

The Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) has reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring that skills development opportunities reach communities across South Africa, particularly in rural and historically disadvantaged areas, as part of efforts to tackle youth unemployment and expand access to specialised training.

Speaking at the launch of the WorldSkills South Africa (WSZA)-Elangeni Aircraft Maintenance Academy, held recently at Elangeni TVET College in Inanda Campus, north of Durban, Higher Education and Training Deputy Minister, Dr Nomusa Dube-Ncube, said the Post-School Education and Training (PSET) sector remained committed to taking skills directly to communities often excluded from economic opportunities.

“The Ministry is committed to the efforts of the Post-School Education and Training sector to take skills to the people, especially in rural areas,” Dube-Ncube said.

She said government was determined to ensure that young people’s access to employment opportunities was not limited by their gender, social and economic background, and their environment.

“Our bias remains that we want to see improvement and skills transfer and acquisition happening in areas that are often considered peripheral to the agenda of the skills revolution,” Dube-Ncube said.

The academy, launched through a strategic public-private partnership between Elangeni TVET College, WorldSkills South Africa and Starlite Aviation, is the first academy within the public education sector to offer specialised aircraft maintenance training.

The initiative is expected to play a significant role in developing technical skills for South Africa’s aviation industry while opening career opportunities for young people from underserved communities.

Dube-Ncube described the academy as a tangible demonstration of government’s commitment to ensuring that education and skills development create viable pathways that open the doors to employment and subsequently create a future, where “development is not just an ideal but a realisation.”

“Our commitment to the skills revolution extends beyond the lecture room and classroom. It is a commitment that seeks to ensure that we reduce the harrowing percentage of youth unemployment,” the Deputy Minister said.

Dube-Ncube added that the academy remains a realisation of the work and hope for the youth of South Africa, who should never be limited by their backgrounds.

“The students of Inanda can be artisans, technicians, and belong to the aviation industry too,” she said.

She expressed hope that the academy will also inspire young people across the country, including those living in remote areas of Limpopo, North West and Mpumalanga, to pursue careers in engineering and aircraft maintenance.

“The sky is not the limit. We are encouraged to shatter the glass ceiling [and] see young women and men dominating the skills industry, ” Dube-Ncube said.

The launch comes during Youth Month, a period in which South Africa commemorates the role of young people in the country’s history and reflects on the challenges facing today’s youth.

“This youth month, we say our revolution is present to the needs of the Youth of South Africa. We recognize fully that innovation, African advancement, designing of systems, technical expertise for industry access and improvement, lies solely in the hands of our youth!” Dube-Ncube said. – SAnews.gov.za

GabiK

0

SIU granted freezing order on UIF-TERS obtained property

Source: Government of South Africa

SIU granted freezing order on UIF-TERS obtained property

The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) continues to claw back State funds obtained through fraudulent Unemployment Insurance Funds Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme (UIF TERS) claims through a freezing order on a R2.7 million KwaZulu-Natal property.

The preservation order was granted by the Special Tribunal following an application by the corruption-busting unit.

“The property is linked to Ziqoqe Construction CC. It is connected to the alleged fraudulent abuse of [UIF TERS] during the COVID-19 pandemic. The SIU investigation revealed that Ndabezinhle Luthuli, the owner of Ziqoqe Construction, submitted TERS applications on behalf of alleged employees of the company for the ‘shutdown’ periods between 27 March 2020 and 15 August 2020.

“The investigation established that the UIF paid a total of R9,836,047.06 in TERS benefits to Ziqoqe Construction between 21 July 2020 and 30 September 2024. However, the SIU’s investigation found that Luthuli did not pay any of the alleged 673 employees and failed to refund UIF,” the SIU said.

Furthermore, a portion of the employees listed were found to be ghost employees and “several individuals contacted by investigators denied ever working for the company”.

“The SIU discovered that a property…was purchased in November 2023 through purported fraudulent transactions, suggesting that the profits from illegal activities were utilised to benefit Luthuli.

“As part of its ongoing investigation, the SIU conducted search-and-seizure operations on 12 December 2025 against associated individuals and entities.

“The Tribunal has since granted an order directing the deeds registry to restrict the immovable property registered in the name of Luthuli,” the unit added.

The property may not be sold, transferred, or encumbered without “written agreement between the parties or an order from the court or Tribunal”.

“The Tribunal further ordered that Luthuli and Ziqoqe Construction remain responsible for all financial obligations related to the property, including levies, insurance, and associated costs, while the matter is pending. The costs of the application were reserved for determination at a later stage.

“The SIU remains committed to recovering public funds lost through corruption and maladministration, and to ensuring accountability for those who sought to exploit relief measures intended to support businesses and workers during the COVID-19 pandemic,” the SIU concluded. – SAnews.gov.za

NeoB

0

Mhlauli calls on youth to shape South Africa’s future through democracy

Source: Government of South Africa

Mhlauli calls on youth to shape South Africa’s future through democracy

Deputy Minister in the Presidency Nonceba Mhlauli says the courage displayed by the June 16 generation, 50 years ago, transformed the country forever.

“Many of those young people were not much older than the participants gathered in this hall today. They did not possess wealth, political office or institutional power,” Mhlauli said.

Addressing the Mpumalanga Provincial Youth Parliament in Mpumalanga, Mhlauli said those young people understood a truth that continues to resonate across generations, that young people have the capacity to shape history when they organise, participate and refuse to be silent in the face of injustice.

“The true legacy of the youth of 1976 lies not only in what they protested against, but in what they stood for,” Mhlauli said.

Mhlauli said the 1976 youth stood for dignity. They stood for equality. They stood for access to education. They stood for opportunity. They stood for the belief that young people should have a voice in determining the future of their country. 

“Today, the responsibility of our generation is different, but it is no less important. The youth of 1976 fought for freedom. 

“The youth of 2026 must use that freedom to build prosperous communities, strengthen democratic institutions, hold leaders accountable and create opportunities for future generations.

“They fought to secure a democratic South Africa. We must now ensure that our democracy delivers on its promise for a better life for all,” the Deputy Minister said.

The Deputy Minister told the young people that the Youth Parliament exists because democracy cannot be reduced to voting every five years.

“A healthy democracy requires continuous engagement between citizens and the institutions that serve them. It requires citizens who ask questions. It requires leaders who provide answers. It requires transparency, accountability and active participation.

“The concept behind this Youth Parliament recognises that young people continue to face serious challenges, including unemployment, poverty, economic exclusion, unequal access to opportunities and social vulnerability,” she said.

Mhlauli said the Youth Parliament recognises that young people are not merely beneficiaries of government programmes.

“They are partners in development. They are stakeholders in governance. They are active participants in shaping public policy and monitoring implementation.

“For many years, Youth Parliament has provided an important platform through which young people have influenced public discourse and contributed to policy development,” Mhlauli said.

Mhlauli said the impact of youth activism and youth engagement can be seen in numerous initiatives that have transformed opportunities for young South Africans.

“We have seen the establishment of institutions dedicated to youth development, including the National Youth Development Agency, Youth Directorates at Provincial and Municipal level, and other interventions aimed at expanding opportunities for young people.

“These achievements remind us that youth voices matter and that organised youth participation can influence the direction of public policy,” she said.

With regard to the coming Local Government elections, Mhlauli appealed the young people to register to vote, ensure that their names appears on the voters’ roll. 

“Verify your details. Make use of the online platforms that have been created to make registration easier and more accessible. 

“However, registration alone is not enough. Registration is only the first step. Once you have registered, you must also vote. A democracy cannot be strengthened by people who are registered but absent on Election Day. 

“The true power of citizenship lies not only in having the right to vote, but in exercising that right,” Mhlauli said. 

Mhlauli told the young people to confront the reality that there are many young South Africans who are uncertain about whether participate in elections still makes a difference.

“Many feel frustrated by the pace of change in their communities. Others question whether their vote has any real impact on the challenges they face every day. 

“Some have become disillusioned by instances of poor service delivery, unemployment, inequality and unfulfilled promises. These feelings are real and they should not be dismissed. If we are serious about strengthening our democracy, we must acknowledge these frustrations honestly and engage with them directly,” she said.

Mhlauli said the greatest mistake that young people can make is to conclude that because change has been slower than expected, participation no longer matters. 

“The truth is that democracy does not stop functioning when citizens choose not to participate. Decisions continue to be made. Budgets continue to be approved. Development priorities continue to be determined. 

“Councillors continue to be elected. Municipal projects continue to move forward. The only difference is that those decisions are made without the input of the very people who are most affected by them,” the Deputy Minister said. 

Government recently launched the national programme commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Soweto Uprising.

The launch marked the start of a year-long government programme aimed at honouring the sacrifices of the 1976 student uprising, a defining moment in South Africa’s liberation struggle, while inspiring a new generation of young people. – SAnews.gov.za

Edwin

0

Anti-foreigner violence in South Africa is easily sparked: what hasn’t been done to deal with it

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Alan Hirsch, Senior Research Fellow New South Institute, Emeritus Professor at The Nelson Mandela School of Public Governance, University of Cape Town

Threats and deadly conflict over migration are spreading fast in South Africa. This is hugely worrying and could result in widespread injury and killings, as it has in the past.

The region’s investment prospects could be dimmed too, due to perceptions of political instability.

The need for effective responses is real and urgent. The death toll, while disputed, is rising, and reports of marches, threats, sacking of dwellings and violence are widespread across South Africa.

Anti-foreigner hysteria is being driven by online campaigns which appear to be highly organised. They include the use of faked information and graphics.

It is also being driven by campaign leaders and by politicians who support campaigns to root out foreigners, either actively or simply by justifying the arguments used by the more dangerous activists. The UN secretary general, Amnesty International and several foreign governments, including those of Mozambique, Nigeria and Ghana, have berated South Africa for not responding appropriately to anti-migrant mobilisation.


Read more: South Africans are far less tolerant of migrants than before – hotspots, drivers and solutions


In a televised address on Sunday 7 May 2026, the country’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, outlined various initiatives to lessen the conflicts over migration. But was this a coherent response, or a missed opportunity to make real progress?

The core of the response was the five-point plan agreed to by a special cabinet committee meeting last week. The points included a law enforcement crackdown (including intensifying deportations), establishing dedicated immigration courts, rooting out employment of undocumented workers, securing borders, and tackling corruption (including a reform of identity systems.)

Ramaphosa admitted that economic conditions and the poor state of many public services explained why people were desperate and that grievances, including grievances about the influx of undocumented migrants, were “real”. Some have interpreted his stance as justifying the association of foreigners with the grievances that poor South Africans have.

Based on my work as a political economist in migration governance over the past decade, I know that virtually all the specific actions mentioned in the five parts of the plan had already been announced by the South African government, though not as a concerted platform to address the current crisis. Yet implementation has been painfully slow.


Read more: South Africa’s new immigration policy takes a digital direction – will it succeed?


Clearly, there needs to be urgent and visible follow-through on these commitments. This should include the promise to clamp down on anti-foreigner agitators and those who have wounded or killed people they believed to be foreign. To my knowledge, very few agitators and attackers have been arrested, let alone charged. None of the leaders inciting dangerous actions have been arrested, or even called out by political leaders.

To help reduce the violence and the perception of risk, a number of additional steps need to be taken. Firstly, the forging of a collective political front of parties in the country against anti-foreigner activities. Secondly, the mobilisation of civic and religious institutions to fight against irresponsible politicking. Third, a renegotiation of colonial-era bilateral labour agreements with South Africa’s five neighbouring countries. And finally, addressing the country’s acute unemployment crisis.

Four steps that could make a difference

Firstly, the head of state – or the head of his political party – should bring together the leaders of all the significant political parties in a forum which commits to agreeing not to incite anti-foreigner sentiment, and also, as a group, condemns such behaviour.

Secondly, leaders of civic and religious institution could be encouraged to do the same – to warn against irresponsible politicking. Further than that, religious and community groupings could be encouraged and even assisted by government to drive programmes to include foreigners into the mainstream of South African society in a constructive way.

There are examples of how to do this in other parts of the world in developed and developing countries. These include South America and other African countries.

National, provincial and local governments could also drive initiatives to include foreigners into the national community. These could be standalone programmes or in cooperation with civil society institutions.

Thirdly, there should be a renegotiation of bilateral labour agreements with five neighbouring countries. In a white paper released in 2025 the government committed to establishing employment quotas for South Africans in various sectors of industry. It also committed to the renegotiation of the bilateral deals. The existing agreements are colonial in origin and form. They withhold virtually all labour and social rights from migrant labourers. And they don’t accommodate long-term labour migration contracts, now common in other parts of the world.

Such reforms could create more manageable as well as fair and equitable systems of migrant labour. South Africa could address its labour needs in a workable way. And the temptation to bypass the system should be lower, with fewer undocumented migrant workers.

It’s not realistic yet to do away with regional labour migration, but it could be far better managed.

Finally, Ramaphosa said he’d be sending out envoys “to seek to find sustainable solutions to these challenges”. But this has already been done, more than 20 years ago. South Africa and some of its neighbours agreed to a protocol on the facilitation of the movement of persons in the southern African region. This initiative was negotiated in the Southern African Development Community.

But since the protocol was signed by several heads of state in the region in 2005, there has been no progress. South Africa, its partners and the Southern African Development Community itself are guilty of negligence and should accept that they could have and can do more to avoid crises such as the present one.

Poorer South Africans are vulnerable to anti-foreigner mobilisation because of their dire economic circumstances: 32.7% unemployment; 37.8% of people classified as very poor. And public services are often very bad.

More growth and more jobs must dampen the powder-keg that is so easily sparked.

But even before that is achieved, there is a great deal that could be done to eliminate the spark itself – tensions over migration.

– Anti-foreigner violence in South Africa is easily sparked: what hasn’t been done to deal with it
– https://theconversation.com/anti-foreigner-violence-in-south-africa-is-easily-sparked-what-hasnt-been-done-to-deal-with-it-284778

Statement by President Cyril Ramaphosa on the passing of His Majesty King Makhosonke II of the Amandebele nation

Source: President of South Africa –

It is with deep sadness that I mourn the passing away today, Tuesday, 9 June 2026, of His Majesty King Makhosonke II – Enock Makhosonke Mabhena – reigning King of the amaNdebele Nation.

His Majesty, the traditional leader of the amaNdebele akwaManala, has left us at the age of 65 after 40 years on the throne.

My thoughts and prayers – and I know those of the nation – go out today to the Royal Household, Her Majesty Queen Sekhothali, amaNdebele and the Basotho nation from whom Her Majesty is descended.

We will in due course pay tribute to the King as a pillar of national unity in diversity and as a champion of development, with education and land restitution as part of his vision.

Today we mourn his passing and we stand alongside amaNdebele in this painful hour.

We offer our deep condolences to the Royal Household once more.

Media enquiries: Vincent Magwenya, Spokesperson to the President – media@presidency.gov.za

Issued by: The Presidency
Pretoria
 

Address by Deputy Minister in The Presidency, Nonceba Mhlauli, on the occasion of the Mpumalanga Provincial Youth Parliament

Source: President of South Africa –

Programme Director, Honourable Ms R. Nkonyane;
Acting Premier of Mpumalanga, Honourable Moeketsi;
Honourable Deputy Speaker and Acting Speaker, S. Masango;
Members of the Executive Council;
Honourable Members of the Provincial Legislature;
Executive Mayor of Govan Mbeki Local Municipality, Councillor N.G. Zuma;
Representatives of political parties represented in this Youth Parliament;
Representatives of the various traditional councils present;
Representatives of Government departments and public entities;
Leaders of youth formations;
Students, entrepreneurs, young professionals and community activists;
Distinguished guests;

Good morning/ sanibonani.

It is a privilege to join you today during Youth Month as we gather for the Mpumalanga Youth Parliament 2026. I would like to begin by congratulating the Mpumalanga Provincial Legislature for continuing to provide this platform for young people to engage directly with government, interrogate policy implementation, and contribute meaningfully to the future direction of our democracy. 

In a society that seeks to deepen participation and strengthen accountability, forums such as this are not ceremonial events. They are essential democratic instruments that bring government closer to the people it serves.

The significance of this gathering is amplified by the fact that it takes place during June, a month that occupies a special place in the history of our country. We pause to remember the actions of 16 June 1976, when thousands of young people took to the streets to challenge an unjust system and demand a better future. The courage displayed by that generation 50 years ago, transformed our country forever. 

Many of those young people were not much older than the participants gathered in this hall today. They did not possess wealth, political office or institutional power. Yet they understood a truth that continues to resonate across generations: that young people have the capacity to shape history when they organise, participate and refuse to be silent in the face of injustice.

As we reflect on the sacrifices of 1976 on this 50th anniversary, it is important that we do not reduce their contribution to a single day of remembrance. The true legacy of the youth of 1976 lies not only in what they protested against, but in what they stood for. 

They stood for dignity. They stood for equality. They stood for access to education. They stood for opportunity. They stood for the belief that young people should have a voice in determining the future of their country.

Today, the responsibility of our generation is different, but it is no less important. The youth of 1976 fought for freedom. The youth of 2026 must use that freedom to build prosperous communities, strengthen democratic institutions, hold leaders accountable and create opportunities for future generations. They fought to secure a democratic South Africa. We must now ensure that our democracy delivers on its promise for a better life for all.

Ladies and gentlemen,

This year’s theme challenges us to move beyond speeches, slogans and aspirations. It challenges us to ask a fundamental question: are we doing enough to ensure that government commitments translate into meaningful improvements in the lives of young people? 

This is precisely why Youth Parliament matters.

Youth Parliament exists because democracy cannot be reduced to voting every five years. A healthy democracy requires continuous engagement between citizens and the institutions that serve them. It requires citizens who ask questions. It requires leaders who provide answers. It requires transparency, accountability and active participation.

The concept behind this Youth Parliament recognises that young people continue to face serious challenges, including unemployment, poverty, economic exclusion, unequal access to opportunities and social vulnerability. 

At the same time, it recognises that young people are not merely beneficiaries of government programmes. They are partners in development. They are stakeholders in governance. They are active participants in shaping public policy and monitoring implementation.

For many years, Youth Parliament has provided an important platform through which young people have influenced public discourse and contributed to policy development. The impact of youth activism and youth engagement can be seen in numerous initiatives that have transformed opportunities for young South Africans.

We have seen the establishment of institutions dedicated to youth development, including the National Youth Development Agency, Youth Directorates at Provincial and Municipal level, and other interventions aimed at expanding opportunities for young people. These achievements remind us that youth voices matter and that organised youth participation can influence the direction of public policy. 

Programme Director,

As we approach the 2026 Local Government Elections, we must confront a reality that there are many young South Africans who are uncertain about whether participating in elections still makes a difference. Many feel frustrated by the pace of change in their communities. Others question whether their vote has any real impact on the challenges they face every day. 

Some have become disillusioned by instances of poor service delivery, unemployment, inequality and unfulfilled promises. These feelings are real and they should not be dismissed. If we are serious about strengthening our democracy, we must acknowledge these frustrations honestly and engage with them directly.

At the same time, we must be careful not to allow frustration to become disengagement. There is a significant difference between being disappointed and becoming detached from the democratic process. 

The greatest mistake that young people can make is to conclude that because change has been slower than expected, participation no longer matters. The truth is that democracy does not stop functioning when citizens choose not to participate. 

Decisions continue to be made. Budgets continue to be approved. Development priorities continue to be determined. Councillors continue to be elected. Municipal projects continue to move forward. The only difference is that those decisions are made without the input of the very people who are most affected by them.

This is why I want to make a direct appeal to every young person gathered here today. Register to vote. Ensure that your name appears on the voters’ roll. Verify your details. Make use of the online platforms that have been created to make registration easier and more accessible. 

However, registration alone is not enough. Registration is only the first step. Once you have registered, you must also vote. A democracy cannot be strengthened by people who are registered but absent on Election Day. The true power of citizenship lies not only in having the right to vote, but in exercising that right.

Ladies and gentlemen,

We must also challenge the misconception that democracy begins and ends at the ballot box. Elections are important, but elections are only one part of democratic participation. In many respects, the real work begins after the votes have been counted. The quality of our democracy depends not only on who we elect, but also on how actively citizens remain engaged once those leaders assume office.

Too often, communities only become active when election campaigns begin. Political parties arrive. Manifestos are distributed. Meetings are held. Promises are made. Once the election has passed, many citizens withdraw from public life and wait another five years before engaging again. 

This approach weakens accountability and limits the ability of communities to influence development outcomes. Active citizenship requires continuous engagement throughout the electoral cycle.

Young people must therefore participate in the structures that influence decision-making at local level. They must attend ward meetings. They must participate in public consultations. They must engage with municipal planning processes. They must contribute to Integrated Development Plans. They must familiarise themselves with municipal budgets and development priorities. They must understand how decisions are made and how resources are allocated. Most importantly, they must ensure that the voices of young people are represented whenever decisions affecting their communities are being discussed.

When a municipality announces a housing project, young people should ask what progress has been made six months later. When commitments are made regarding roads, water infrastructure, sports facilities, libraries or community development programmes, young people should continue asking questions long after the announcement has been made. Accountability does not begin when a project is launched. Accountability begins when citizens demand evidence that implementation is taking place.

More importantly, young people must demand their stake in all development aspects of society. We must demand adequate youth representation in all spheres of Government. The notion of “nothing about us. Without us” must become our rallying call.

As young people of Mpumalanga, you must demand to see the Office of the Premier improve the Youth Fund, to ensure you have improved access to funding. You must track whether all government departments are successfully setting aside thirty percent of their procurement for companies owned by young people. 

You must monitor efforts to lobby the Department of Mineral Resources so that at least 30% of mining rights in the Province are allocated to local mining committees to benefit the youth. 

And finally, you must ensure the Department of Economic Development and Tourism delivers on conducting at least three workshops per district in the 2026/27 financial year to train youth-owned enterprises.

Ladies and gentlemen, 

Commemorations and speeches are no longer enough. To achieve this, government is stepping in decisively. We are shifting from policy discussions to aggressive implementation through the launch of five major, government-backed Catalytic Youth Empowerment Projects. These interventions are designed to physically alter the economic landscape for young South Africans. Let me briefly explain what these interventions entail.

The Presidential Youth Employment Intervention (PYEI), in partnership with the National Youth Service (NYS), is officially calling on 100,000 young South Africans to step forward.

What is this program?

This is not just a temporary fix; it is a launch-pad. The PYEI and NYS initiative is designed to transition you from unemployment into the active economy. By joining this cohort of 100,000, you are signing up to serve your country, uplift your community, and, most importantly, build your own future.

Here is exactly what the program delivers:

• Through Meaningful Community Service – You will be placed in roles that directly improve your local communities from education and public health to infrastructure and social development.
• By gaining Real-World Skills Development – You won’t just be working; you will be receiving formal training, mentorship, and practical experience that makes you highly employable once the program ends.
• And for Financial Support – You will receive a monthly stipend. You will earn while you learn, giving you the dignity and financial breathing room to plan your next steps.

We also invite you to register on SAYouth.Mobi which is a 100% data-free national online network that connects unemployed South African youth aged 15 to 34 with free job, learning, volunteering, and entrepreneurship opportunities.

Since inception, the Presidential Youth Employment Initiative has facilitated access to more than 2.36 million earning opportunities. Importantly, over 70% of the opportunities accessed through SA Youth have been taken up by young women, helping close historical gender gaps. 

Furthermore, to ensure our youth are not left behind in the global digital economy, government is rolling out iamtheCODE. This intervention targets 600,000 young people, deliberately prioritising young women in our most rural and marginalised communities. 

Through a 12-week blended STEAMD curriculum, Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics, and Design; we are providing direct digital skills training, e-courses, and global mentorship to bridge the digital divide.

Second, as cyber threats grow globally, South Africa currently loses billions annually to cybercrime. We are turning this vulnerability into an employment opportunity through the CSIR Cybersecurity intervention. The government will recruit and train unemployed graduates in Computer Science and Mathematics, with the explicit goal of incubating and launching 2,000 tech-led, youth-owned cybersecurity start-ups. We are empowering the youth to become the digital defenders of our national infrastructure.

Third, we are launching GRIT Lab Africa, a massive push into Artificial Intelligence and future tech. Over the next three years, the government will absorb 10,000 unemployed graduates into this program. This includes deploying an ‘AI Instructors Brigade’ to teach coding and robotics in under-resourced public schools, and providing AI innovation tools to youth-owned SMMEs so they can scale their businesses and create further employment.

Finally, we must industrialise our agricultural sector. Through the South African National Service Initiative (SANSI), the government is launching a massive skills massification program focused on Goat and Sheep development. This is not just training; it is ownership. We are taking intakes of 5,000 graduates, training them for 18 months, and providing them with a starter pack of 52 animals and state veterinary support. Through local hubs, this intervention will absorb 50,000 youth recruits annually, giving them a direct stake in the agricultural economy.

Combined, Phase 1 of these government interventions will directly impact over 737,000 young lives. 

Comrades, the renewal of the national project is the task of this generation. 

Fellow young people,

The future is calling. We must ensure that when we mark 50 years since 1976, we are not just remembering the past, but actively building a working, thriving, and empowered youth.

South Africa needs a new generation of young leaders who understand both the challenges facing our communities and the opportunities available to transform them. We need young leaders who are committed to ethical leadership, public service and community development. We need young leaders who are prepared to engage difficult issues and work collaboratively to solve problems. We need young leaders who understand that leadership is not about status or titles, but about service and impact.

Ladies and gentlemen,

None of these aspirations will be realised if young people remain isolated from one another.

Throughout history, meaningful change has been driven by organised people working together around a common purpose. The generation of 1976 was organised.

The challenge before young people today is therefore not simply to participate as individuals. The challenge is to organise collectively around the issues that matter most.

Young people must organise around education. They must organise around entrepreneurship. They must organise around community development. They must organise around volunteerism. They must organise around environmental sustainability. They must organise around innovation and technological advancement. Most importantly, they must organise themselves around doing good and creating positive change within their communities.

The youth of 1976 did not have a cellphone, a TikTok, Facebook, Instagram or X account, nor did they have NYDA or SMME funding, they had a conviction and a song. Under those circumstances, they managed to put their country on a course for total liberation for me and you to here today. 

The future that we seek to build will not be delivered to us by others. It will be built through the collective efforts of citizens who choose to participate, contribute and lead. 

The question before us is therefore not whether young people have the power to shape South Africa’s future. The question is whether they are prepared to use that power. 

Amandla!! 

South Africa, Italy move to deepen agricultural trade and investment partnership

Source: Government of South Africa

South Africa, Italy move to deepen agricultural trade and investment partnership

South Africa and Italy are seeking to strengthen agricultural trade, investment and technology cooperation, as the two countries move to deepen economic ties through a new partnership aimed at unlocking opportunities across the agricultural value chain.

Speaking at the inaugural South Africa-Italy Agribusiness Forum, currently underway in Cape Town, Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen said the relationship between the two countries had evolved beyond traditional trade and was entering a new phase focused on investment, innovation, agro-processing and job creation.

Steenhuisen said the relationship between two countries is already built on strong commercial foundations. Agricultural trade between South Africa and Italy currently exceeds R650 million annually, with South Africa maintaining a positive agricultural trade balance and horticultural exports alone valued at approximately R190 million.

“These figures tell an important story. They demonstrate that Italian consumers and businesses already recognise the quality of South African agricultural products. But they also suggest that we are only scratching the surface of what is possible.

“The real opportunity lies not simply in exporting more fruit, nuts and other agricultural products, but in combining South Africa’s production strengths with Italy’s world-renowned expertise in processing, packaging, technology and branding to create greater value across the entire supply chain,” Steenhuisen said.

The two-day forum, taking place on 9 and 10 June 2026, brought together business leaders, innovators and policymakers from both countries to explore new opportunities for investment, technology exchange and market access.

Held under the theme: “South Africa and Italy Building Resilient, Value-Added Agri-Business Partnerships: From the Soil to the Shelf”, the forum aims to advance economic development through international collaboration and promote sustainable growth within the agricultural sector.

Steenhuisen said South Africa’s strategic position as a gateway to African markets, coupled with the opportunities presented by the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), made the country an attractive partner for Italian investors seeking access to one of the world’s fastest-growing consumer markets.

He noted that South Africa and Italy possess complementary strengths that could support the development of integrated agricultural value chains spanning production, processing, logistics, technology, and retail.

The Minister highlighted opportunities for collaboration across several provinces. In the Western Cape, he said partnerships could be expanded in wine production, citrus and fisheries industries, food processing, and packaging technologies.

He said in Limpopo, where avocados, citrus, mangoes and nuts are driving agricultural growth, there are clear opportunities to work with regions such as Sicily, Calabria and Campania, which have developed sophisticated industries around fruit processing and Mediterranean crop systems.

“Whether through avocado oil production, fruit pulp processing, citrus value addition or export partnerships, there is considerable scope to build integrated value chains that create more value on both sides,” the Minister said.

He also noted that Mpumalanga’s macadamia and horticultural industries could benefit from Italian expertise in orchard technologies, precision agriculture, smart irrigation systems and advanced packaging solutions.

Similar opportunities exist in the Eastern Cape’s dairy and livestock industries, the grain-producing provinces of the Free State and North West, and KwaZulu-Natal’s sugar, forestry and subtropical fruit sectors.

“What emerges from this picture is not simply a trade relationship. It is the possibility of building integrated value chains that connect farms, processors, logistics providers, researchers, technology companies and retailers across both countries. This is exactly the kind of economic partnership we should be striving for,” Steenhuisen said.

The forum also focused on expanding cooperation in agricultural research, biosecurity and innovation. Steenhuisen said stronger collaboration between South Africa’s Agricultural Research Council (ARC) and Italy’s Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA) could help accelerate innovation, improve plant and animal health systems and strengthen resilience against emerging agricultural threats.

Framework for long-term cooperation

A key outcome of the forum is expected to be the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between South Africa and Italy. The agreement will provide a framework for long-term cooperation in areas including agricultural mechanisation, digital agriculture, agro-processing, technology transfer, extension services, seed development, soil health, and sanitary and phytosanitary measures.

The MoU will also establish a Joint Working Group tasked with ensuring that commitments made by both countries translate into practical projects and measurable outcomes.

Steenhuisen said the partnership would support South Africa’s objective of increasing value addition in the agricultural sector and help create jobs by expanding processing and manufacturing opportunities linked to agriculture.

“This forum is about far more than increasing trade volumes. It is about creating the commercial relationships, investments and technology exchanges that will enable both our countries to move further up the value chain,” the Minister said. – SAnews.gov.za

GabiK

6