MIL-OSI Publisher – Page 37 – MIL Africa Engine

June 4, 2026

Are Uganda’s environmental impact reports just a box-ticking exercise? What a study of 108 projects reveals

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Mulumba M Agaba, Researcher, University of Liverpool

Uganda’s environmental impact assessment system is meant to protect the environment from harmful development projects. For nearly 30 years, the law has required developers applying for approval to consider alternatives to their proposed projects, such as different sites, designs, technologies or even whether the project should go ahead at all. This is intended to make sure that the least environmentally damaging option is chosen. Biodiversity and environmental impact assessment researcher Mulumba M. Agaba examined 108 environmental impact statements submitted between 2001 and 2023 to assess whether developers were complying with this requirement.

Why aren’t developers allowed to propose only one option?

Environmental impact assessments globally are used to evaluate the environmental consequences of major projects before they are approved. They give decision-makers clear information about the likely impact of the project on the environment, and about whether less damaging options are available. In Uganda, assessors must be certified by the National Environment Management Authority. However, they are usually hired and paid by the project developer.

The main aim in project planning is to first avoid harming the environment. If that’s not possible, developers need to reduce the damage they do. The last option – repairing damage and paying compensation – should only happen when there is no better option.

The World Bank Environmental and Social Framework and the Convention on Biological Diversity stress that it’s best to avoid environmental damage rather than managing it later.

For this reason, it’s international best practice for developers to come up with alternatives to their planned projects. Considering more environmentally friendly alternatives is an important step in constructing new projects and is meant to shape decisions before projects are locked in.

What’s wrong with the system?

We examined 108 environmental impact assessment reports to see whether developers had properly considered different project options. We also interviewed 18 environmental assessment practitioners about how alternatives are chosen, whether environmental concerns are taken seriously, and why these assessments so often fail to change the final decision on projects.

Our findings are concerning.

Developers routinely include other project options in environmental impact assessment reports, but the study found these were often given only limited attention. The alternatives were usually described briefly, with little evidence-based comparison. In many cases, the reports did not explain why one option would be better for the environment than another. The researchers concluded that alternatives rarely appear to shape the final decision on which projects are approved.

Second, biodiversity gets very little attention in these assessments. Even where different options are considered, they are usually judged mainly on cost or whether they are technically possible, while environmental impacts are treated as less important or ignored. For example, different options were not compared based on their likely impact on habitats, species, ecosystem services, protected areas and other environmentally sensitive areas.

Sectors vary in how clearly reports set out different options, how carefully they compare them, and whether they consider biodiversity when explaining a choice. Projects in sectors that face strong outside scrutiny, such as oil and gas, tend to do this better. Manufacturing and urban development projects tend to do this poorly.

There has been little improvement over time. Uganda’s National Environment Act was passed in 2019, and emphasises that the first priority is to cause no damage to the environment. But in the assessments that followed, there was no clear evidence that biodiversity was being better integrated into decision-making.

Which alternatives get attention, and which are ignored?

Our research found that most environmental impact assessments describe what might happen if the project does not go ahead, but they focus on how the economy will lose out rather than on how the environment will gain.

Technology and design alternatives are sometimes considered, but rarely in depth. Moving a development to a different location is often not explored at all.

The areas where projects could most reduce harm to the environment are the ones that get the least attention. For example, we found that developers rarely compare whether a different way of building or running a project would cause less environmental damage. They rarely consider changing timing or building methods.

Environmental impact statements usually stick to one chosen approach, and then add mitigation measures afterwards, rather than properly testing whether other approaches might be better for nature from the start.

There is a clear pattern. Alternatives that could genuinely reduce environmental harm are the least explored.

What can be done to change this?

Our research developed a Biodiversity Inclusion Index to assess whether 108 environmental impact reports properly considered alternative options and their effects on species, habitats and entire ecosystems.

The index examines whether biodiversity was properly considered when different project options were compared. It looks at whether the assessment explained how different choices could avoid or reduce harm to species, habitats and ecosystems.

The results are stark. The average score was just 0.33. This indicates weak and inconsistent integration of biodiversity across most projects. A good score would be 1 – meaning that biodiversity is clearly included in how alternatives are identified and justified.

Only a small number of projects performed well. These are typically projects with international financing or higher regulatory scrutiny.

Why does this matter?

Once a project’s location, design, phasing and technology are fixed, environmental damage can only be fixed later. In other words, the focus shifts to mitigation. At that point, the best ways to protect the environment are already off the table.

This is not the way to protect Uganda’s biodiversity. Choosing a different site, adjusting a development’s layout, or changing when it is built can prevent irreversible damage. These decisions must happen before the development gets started because they determine whether ecosystems are protected or lost.

Our research found that many Ugandan developments give the appearance of complying with environmental laws. But actually, they are locking in avoidable biodiversity loss.

The Biodiversity Inclusion Index offers a practical way to check whether alternatives analysis is genuinely considering biodiversity. It could be adapted by developers, regulators and reviewers to improve how project options are compared before decisions are locked in.

Environmental impact assessors can use this index to improve the quality of their assessments. Policymakers can use our research to find ways of better enforcing environmental protection.

– Are Uganda’s environmental impact reports just a box-ticking exercise? What a study of 108 projects reveals
– https://theconversation.com/are-ugandas-environmental-impact-reports-just-a-box-ticking-exercise-what-a-study-of-108-projects-reveals-281936

June 4, 2026

Poison or poverty: the impossible economic choices facing Ghana’s e-waste workers

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Brandon Marc Finn, Research Scientist at the School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan

Agbogbloshie, in Ghana’s capital city, Accra, is a sprawling, open-air scrapyard located next to a lagoon and a growing informal settlement. Roughly 6,000 people dismantle, recycle and burn old and broken electronics there.

The world produces approximately 62 million tonnes of electronic or e-waste every year. The Agbogbloshie site is one of the world’s biggest.

E-waste is old, broken and thrown away electronic devices with cords or batteries, such as cellphones, household appliances, and televisions. Over 80% is dumped in landfills or processed informally by workers who have no health and safety protections, operating largely without government oversight, support, or occupational safety.

Much of the world’s e-waste is shipped to countries like Ghana in west Africa where copper and aluminium are extracted, and batteries containing lithium and cobalt are recycled. The old electronics are burned out in the open to extract the minerals. Uncontrolled acid leaching is also used.

The exact value of the minerals fed back into the global supply chain is unknown. However, we do know that informal workers are shortchanged. This is because exporters buy recycled minerals like copper at prices well below international market rates.

Continually recycling and reusing goods, instead of throwing them away, is a core part of the “circular economy” concept. It is supposed to promote sustainability and help address climate change.

But as researchers who study informal economies and how materials move through global supply chains, my colleagues Patrick Cobbinah, Dimitrios Gounaridis and I recently found that the reality behind these supposedly “sustainable” supply chains in Agbogbloshie’s e-waste sites is very different.

We found that informal recycling provides an income for workers which is often relatively better than other available work. But the side effects of burning plastic and metal or using acid to extract minerals from the e-waste are devastating to human health and the natural environment.

The situation in Agbogbloshie is part of a global injustice. Wealthy countries enjoy the benefits of recycled materials like copper and aluminium, while some of the world’s most vulnerable people are forced to compromise their own health and environments to sustain these supply chains.

Rather than turn away from people living in informal settlements and working in the informal economy, community engagement should influence government policy to improve their working conditions. Supportive infrastructure must be developed at the e-waste site and in the informal settlement. Equally importantly, international regulatory bodies and policy makers from exporting and importing countries must better govern the flows of e-waste. It’s too easily dumped in countries like Ghana with little to no recourse.

Where earning a living means breathing toxic air

The men and women working in and supporting the informal e-waste economy in Agbogbloshie are navigating what we call the “informal paradox”. This is where workers have to expose themselves and their communities to toxic pollution in order to get short term livelihood gains. The informal paradox shows that the immediate need to survive replaces the need to avoid chronic threats to human and environmental health.

Courtesy University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability.

For example, open burning of electronics has, in part, led to extreme exposure to particulate matter 2.5 (millions of tiny particles of polluting matter such as dust, dirt, soot, or smoke that are released by burning).

The e-waste workers in Agbogbloshie breathe this in at concentrations five times higher than the World Health Organization’s safety standards. This increases the risk of heart attacks, cancer, nervous system damage and other diseases.

The toxic dust also spreads out across nearby informal settlements and the entire city of Accra. Agbogbloshie’s soil and water are also highly contaminated with these and other heavy metals. The effects spill over to the nearby produce market and lagoon.

What 20 years of satellite data revealed about pollution and survival

To understand how serious and complicated this problem has become, we studied 20 years of satellite data and interviewed 55 community members and city experts in Accra.

Our research found that between 2000 and 2020, air pollution and particulate matter 2.5 increased dramatically around Agbogbloshie. The number of people in nearby informal or shack settlements steadily increased during that time, so more people breathed in the toxic soot.

People migrate from rural areas to Agbogbloshie to escape famine, conflict, and worsening farming conditions linked to climate change. For many, processing and recycling e-waste is the only way to earn a living.

The e-waste workers told us they are aware of the dangers they face. As one said:

The hunter does not fear guns, the same way we don’t fear the weapon we work with.

Informal work is the global norm, not the exception

A huge 61% of the world’s workforce is employed informally. This means that working informally is not something that only people on the margins of society experience. It is global and commonplace.

Therefore, new ways to include informal work in the world’s development and supply chains are needed. These must be based on working with, not against, the people who have the least access to services and opportunities.

Guaranteeing basic human and labour rights must be a non-negotiable foundation of the global circular economy. There are also very real economic opportunities in improving working conditions in the e-waste sector. Global e-waste stocks are estimated to be worth US$65 billion. Yet many e-waste workers earn less than US$1.25 a day.

If responsibly managed in the interests of local communities, recycling could lift thousands of people out of poverty and contribute to an actually sustainable circular economy.

What to do about it

Ghana has ratified both international conventions that regulate e-waste. The country also passed a law to manage e-waste in 2016.

But government intervention remains very weak and sometimes even actively harmful. The government has carried out hostile evictions and housing demolitions to remove people from the dumpsite. These have not reduced e-waste recycling though, and have only made workers’ lives more precarious.

To properly address these problems, the Accra Metropolitan Assembly must end home demolitions and evictions in Agbogbloshie’s informal settlements.

Instead, the government should invest in and strengthen the ways residents are already working together to share resources and improve their neighbourhoods. One way to do this is by providing safer equipment, such as mechanised wire-stripping machines to stop the burning as well as protective gear. Local government in Accra could also ensure that e-waste workers earn fair wages in return for using safer, more environmentally friendly methods.

Second, transparency at the point of e-waste sale is essential. New regulations are needed to compel large-scale scrap dealers to officially record the weight of the material they buy, and ensure they pay a publicly accessible market rate.

Third, working with the e-waste workers and community members to set up reliable, clean water sources, limit burning, and reduce the use of acid in e-waste recycling is also critical.

These steps require a transformation in the ways people think about and support those who live and work in informal economies and settlements. This process begins with treating people with the respect and dignity they and their work deserve.

– Poison or poverty: the impossible economic choices facing Ghana’s e-waste workers
– https://theconversation.com/poison-or-poverty-the-impossible-economic-choices-facing-ghanas-e-waste-workers-281479

June 4, 2026

Qatar Condemns Attack on UNIFIL Post in Southern Lebanon

Source: Government of Qatar

Doha | June 4, 2026

The State of Qatar condemns the attack that targeted a post belonging to the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon, and resulted in the death of a Serbian soldier and injuries to two others from El Salvador and Spain. Qatar considers the attack a serious violation of international humanitarian law and UN Security Council Resolution 1701.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterates Qatar’s complete rejection of any attack targeting UNIFIL, which plays a vital role in maintaining security and stability in the sisterly Republic of Lebanon. The Ministry stresses the need for an immediate investigation into the attack and for those responsible to be brought to justice.

The Ministry expresses Qatar’s condolences to the family of the soldier and to the government and people of the Republic of Serbia, as well as its wishes for a speedy recovery for the injured.

June 4, 2026

School in a hot world: what research is saying about children’s health and learning

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Caradee Yael Wright, Chief Specialist Scientist (Public Health), South African Medical Research Council

Climate change is making southern Africa hotter. While much attention has focused on climate impacts like droughts, floods and food insecurity, another crisis is unfolding quietly inside classrooms. Research has shown that some schools are becoming dangerously hot places for children to develop, learn and play.

Hot classrooms can affect concentration, memory, behaviour and academic success. Extreme heat also increases risks to children’s physical and mental health, especially in schools with poor ventilation, overcrowded classrooms and limited access to drinking water.

For many children, especially those in poor communities, school may now be one of the hottest places to spend their day. This is a serious but under-recognised education and public health issue.

Our research as environmental health scientists at the South African Medical Research Council highlights how rising temperatures are affecting daily life and well-being. Multiple studies support this.

Together with the University of Johannesburg, we’ve studied classroom thermal conditions and possible impacts on children’s health in Gauteng province – more than half of the temperature and humidity readings called for caution or extreme caution. Another of our studies, led by University of Johannesburg environmental health researcher Shalin Bidassey-Manilal, measured classroom temperatures in Johannesburg and found that almost all the children reported low concentration levels. One of our studies traced relationships between classroom temperature and absenteeism, which increased at temperatures over 25°C.

Yet, school buildings and playgrounds are not often designed or adapted for protecting children against extreme heat.

Home isn’t always safer either: we’ve shown that families living in government-built low-cost and informally constructed homes are the most at risk for indoor temperature extremes.

Our most recent study has shown that the impacts differ between rural and urban schools too. For example, one of our findings was that urban classrooms were better at keeping the temperature at a comfortable 25°C-28°C compared to rural classrooms. Differences like this deepen educational and health inequalities.

For many people, climate change still feels like a future problem. But for children sitting in overheated classrooms, it is already affecting their ability to learn, thrive and stay healthy. Education systems across southern Africa must better prepare for a hotter future.

Heat affects how children learn

The human brain works best within a relatively narrow temperature range. When classrooms become too hot, children may struggle to concentrate, process information and retain knowledge.

International studies have linked hotter classroom conditions to poorer test scores, reduced attention spans and lower productivity. Teachers may also experience fatigue, headaches and a reduced ability to teach effectively.

Young children are especially vulnerable because their bodies do not regulate heat as efficiently as adults. Children can also become dehydrated more quickly.

In many southern African schools, temperatures inside classrooms may be even higher than outdoor temperatures because of metal roofs, poor insulation, overcrowding and lack of airflow. Some classrooms effectively become heat traps. This problem is likely to worsen as climate change increases the frequency and intensity of heatwaves.

Poorer communities face the greatest risks

The impact of heat is not experienced equally.

We compared schools in urban and rural areas of South Africa (the city of Tshwane and rural Giyani). Among our key findings were that:

the maximum daily average temperature in the urban school was 32°C; in rural schools it was as high as 42°C
indoor temperatures and humidity levels at rural schools were more variable than those in urban classrooms
fan cooling was effective in the city but not in rural classrooms
broken or missing ceilings in rural schools made the rooms hotter
urban classrooms were better at keeping the temperature at a comfortable 25°C-28°C compared to rural classrooms.

Some learners spend hours in classrooms made from corrugated metal or prefabricated materials that absorb and retain heat. Others walk long distances to school in extreme temperatures. Water shortages create additional risks. Without access to safe drinking water, children may become dehydrated during the school day.

The increase in temperatures due to climate change therefore risks deepening educational inequality across the region.

Heat is also a health issue

Extreme heat affects more than academic performance. Children exposed to high temperatures may experience headaches, dizziness, exhaustion and heat stress. Learners with asthma or other chronic conditions may face additional health risks, especially where heat combines with poor air quality. Sleep disruption during hot nights can further affect children’s concentration, mood and school attendance.

Teachers are also affected. High temperatures may contribute to fatigue, stress and reduced workplace wellbeing, particularly during prolonged heatwaves.

Despite these risks, many schools have no heat-health plans or guidance on how to protect learners and staff during extreme heat events. The National Heat Health Action Guidelines call for schools to consider heat in their planning.

Schools need to adapt to a hotter future

The good news is that many solutions are practical and achievable. Schools can reduce heat exposure through better building design, improved ventilation, shade trees, cool roofing materials and access to drinking water. Even relatively simple interventions, such as planting trees or adjusting classroom layouts to improve airflow, can make a meaningful difference.

Governments and education departments should also consider heat when designing new schools and upgrading older infrastructure.

School timetables may need to become more flexible during heatwaves, particularly for sports and outdoor activities.

Teachers and school staff should receive guidance on recognising signs of heat-related illness.

Heat-health warning systems could also include schools as priority sites for communication and intervention.

Importantly, children and young people themselves should be involved in climate adaptation planning. They are already experiencing the impacts of climate change directly.

– School in a hot world: what research is saying about children’s health and learning
– https://theconversation.com/school-in-a-hot-world-what-research-is-saying-about-childrens-health-and-learning-283300

June 4, 2026

Presidents Ramaphosa, Ruto position South Africa and Kenya as drivers of Africa’s global agenda

Source: Government of South Africa

Presidents Ramaphosa, Ruto position South Africa and Kenya as drivers of Africa’s global agenda

South Africa and Kenya have rejected the notion that Africa is merely a spectator in a rapidly changing global order, with Presidents Cyril Ramaphosa and William Ruto asserting that the continent is increasingly shaping global debates on governance, finance, development and peace.

Responding to questions from journalists at a media briefing following their bilateral talks at the Union Buildings on Thursday, the two leaders outlined how Pretoria and Nairobi are working together to advance African interests amid growing geopolitical competition and shifting global power dynamics.

President Ramaphosa said while South Africa and Kenya do not see themselves as superior to other African nations, both countries possess influence that can be used to advance continental priorities.

“As President Ruto said, the two countries, Kenya and South Africa, obviously do not want to overplay our status and importance… on the African continent. All countries on our continent are equal, but our two countries do have an elevated voice and are able to bring about influence that is quite often able to shape things and to move things not only on our continent, but also at a global level,” President Ramaphosa said.

The President stressed that relations between South Africa and Kenya are based on partnership rather than competition.

“We are not rivals. South Africa and Kenya never see ourselves as rivals. We are complementary, and we have our own special strategic relationship that speaks to friendship, that speaks to respect, and that speaks to equality between our two nations,” he said.

The President said the two countries consistently find common ground on continental and international issues, and have strengthened cooperation through institutions such as the African Union.

“We always find that we are so well aligned on many issues, both in dealing with national issues, as well as in dealing with continental matters and global matters,” he said.

The President pointed to ongoing collaboration in conflict resolution efforts across Africa, citing the role both countries have played in peace initiatives in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan and South Sudan.

“Our work is based on cooperation. We cooperate well together, and we are able to come up with initiatives that are aligned, that are aimed at resolving problems on a peaceful basis, and that are aimed at advancing the interests not only of our two countries but also of other countries – sister countries on our continent,” President Ramaphosa said.

Africa shaping global discourse

President Ruto said Africa is increasingly moving from the margins of global decision-making to the centre of international conversations.

“The point that has been made is, are we spectators in this whole unfolding scenario?… Are we making a contribution, or is our voice and our actions part of this whole equation?” President Ruto said.

He argued that African leaders have successfully pushed issues previously overlooked by the international community onto the global agenda.

“It is our very considered view, working as people from the African continent, that for a very long time, our voice, our ideas and proposals did not find their way to fora that could influence global discourse. That has changed. We have taken a very firm position. We have put forward very clear proposals on what we think as a continent,” he said.

He cited ongoing efforts to reform the global financial architecture as one example of Africa’s growing influence.

“The matter of the reform of the international financial architecture was very remote. Many people did not believe that there was a problem on how the Bretton Woods institutions, how access to affordable financing, how countries were treated in terms of credit rating, and how that significantly undermined Africa’s development,” he said.

According to President Ruto, persistent advocacy by African leaders has led to greater international recognition that reforms are needed.

“Today, there is greater appreciation that there is something fundamentally wrong with the global architecture as it stands,” he said.

The Kenyan leader highlighted the establishment of an African credit rating agency and growing calls for reform of global financial institutions as evidence that Africa’s concerns are being heard.

“There is a realisation by the global financial architecture that they need to redesign their engagement with the African continent,” he said.

Africa’s growing voice in global governance

President Ruto also pointed to Africa’s inclusion in the G20 as a major diplomatic achievement.

“Today, Africa is represented at the G20. It is a reform that is undertaken because of the push from those of us from this side of the world.”

He praised South Africa’s leadership during its G20 Presidency, saying it successfully elevated African priorities onto the global stage.

“South Africa became the first African country to host the G20 and I have said here that we commend South Africa and President Ramaphosa, specifically, for taking the stage and positioning Africa rightfully, and our priorities, our concerns, and what we believe the world should look at going forward.”

President Ruto said he would continue advancing the same agenda when he participates in the G7 Summit later this month.

“It is of the same spirit that I will be picking up from where President [Ramaphosa] left at the G20 and I will be taking the same message, the same priorities, and our perspectives to the G7,” he said.

He argued that Africa’s demographic and economic significance makes it impossible to ignore.

“It is no longer possible to ignore a continent as big as ours, with 1.5 billion people, with the largest reserves of resources, whether energy resources, natural resources, human capital.”

Migration diplomacy on the cards

The media briefing also provided fresh insight into South Africa’s plans to address migration challenges through diplomatic engagement with countries across the continent.

Responding to questions about regional migration pressures, President Ramaphosa confirmed that government is considering a range of diplomatic initiatives.

“Yes, we are considering a number of initiatives at the diplomatic level, we are talking to a number of sister countries on our continent, with a view of getting more understanding.”

The President said South Africa wants to work collaboratively with other African countries to find sustainable solutions to migration-related challenges.

“Africa should develop a much stronger method of helping each other to resolve problems, continental problems and national problems.”

President Ramaphosa revealed that discussions on migration had also featured during his meeting with President Ruto.

“We have found joy in being able to talk at a deep level with various leaders, including this morning with President Ruto, when we shared some thoughts and ideas on how best this challenge can be resolved,” he said.

In a significant development, the President confirmed that South Africa will deploy envoys as part of its diplomatic efforts.

“Yes, there will be envoys. There will be people that we will [deploy], not only on the continent, but also around the world,” the President said.

He said the objective would be to ensure migration is addressed through coordinated international cooperation.

“What we seek to do is to get the issue of migration so broadly and properly addressed, and where we should get as many key role players, countries, leaders, and countries to work together to address the challenge of migration,” he said.

President Ramaphosa acknowledged that South Africa remains a destination for many people seeking opportunities.

“South Africa has become an oasis… for people who want to come here for a whole number of reasons.”

However, he stressed that migration is a global challenge requiring collective solutions.

“South Africa is not the only country that is facing the challenge of migration, and we want one to learn from how others have dealt with it and how they’ve dealt with the intricate problems that we are dealing with,” he said.

Mobilising African resources for African development

Beyond global governance reform, President Ruto said African countries must do more to leverage their own resources for development.

He highlighted discussions around African Union reforms and efforts to make continental institutions more effective and financially independent.

“We believe that the African Union must be made fit for purpose so that it can serve the 1.5 billion people on this continent much more effectively.”

President Ruto also called for greater mobilisation of African capital to fund infrastructure and development projects across the continent.

He argued that African resources should increasingly be used to finance African development rather than being invested elsewhere and borrowed back at higher costs.

“What we are saying is that we need our development finance institutions (DFIs) on the continent to mobilise these resources and make them available for the development of our continent.”

The Kenyan President pointed to opportunities for South African investment in Kenya’s energy, transport and infrastructure sectors as an example of how African countries can work together to drive growth.

The remarks reinforced a recurring theme throughout the State Visit, that South Africa and Kenya see their partnership not only as a bilateral relationship, but also as a vehicle for advancing Africa’s development, strengthening continental institutions and ensuring the continent has a stronger voice in shaping the future global order. – SAnews.gov.za

DikelediM
Thu, 06/04/2026 – 16:58

June 4, 2026

Libya Energy & Economic Summit (LEES) 2027 to Define Libya’s Next Phase of Energy Expansion in Tripoli

Source: APO

The fifth edition of the Libya Energy & Economic Summit (LEES) 2027 returns to Tripoli on January 23–25. Positioned as Libya’s landmark energy event, LEES serves as the country’s premier international platform for investment, technical collaboration and private sector engagement across oil, gas, power and renewables.

LEES 2027 builds directly on the outcomes of LEES 2026, which marked Libya’s shift from post-recovery stabilization to execution-led development. The 2026 edition established an estimated $18 billion pipeline of energy and infrastructure projects and repositioned the sector from ambition to delivery, setting the foundation for the 2027 summit’s execution-focused agenda.

A central focus for 2027 is upstream acceleration. The National Oil Corporation’s (NOC) 2026 licensing round introduced 22 on- and offshore exploration blocks, the country’s first in 17 years, alongside a mandate to drill 70 to 100 new wells annually. With support from the Ministry of Oil & Gas, LEES 2027 will evaluate initial seismic results, contract awards and the transition from exploration rights into operational development phases.

Production expansion remains a core investment theme. Libya’s output stabilized at approximately 1.4 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2026, with LEES 2027 targeting pathways toward 1.6 million bpd in the near term and a long-term ambition of 2 million bpd. The summit – endorsed directly by the NOC – will focus on infrastructure bottlenecks, field optimization and midstream capacity required to support higher output levels.

Gas monetization and large-scale infrastructure development will also feature prominently. Eni’s $8 billion offshore Structures A&E project remains on track for completion by late 2027, while discussions around Chevron-linked shale studies highlight potential resources estimated at 123 trillion cubic feet of gas and 18 billion barrels of oil across key basins, including Sirte, Murzuq and Ghadames.

The sector aims to attract an estimated $3–4 billion in annual drilling investment following unified drilling regulations announced in 2026. LEES 2027 will assess early implementation outcomes, including operational safety, fiscal predictability and contract execution efficiency across upstream assets.

Meanwhile, Libya’s 4 GW solar roadmap is advancing, anchored by TotalEnergies’ 500 MW Sadada solar project. Supported by the Renewable Energy Authority of Libya as an institutional partner, LEES 2027 is expected to focus on financial close milestones, construction timelines and the scaling of independent power purchase structures within the national grid strategy.

Human capital development will also remain a strategic pillar at next year’s event, with the Energy JEEL initiative having trained more than 900 youth participants aged 15–35 in engineering, digital systems and energy operations, forming a national talent pipeline aligned with Libya’s long-term energy transition and industrial expansion goals.

Against this backdrop, LEES 2027 – which takes place at the Tripoli International Convention Center – will serve as the sector’s execution benchmark, converting licensing frameworks, infrastructure commitments and production targets into operational outcomes across hydrocarbons, power generation and next-generation energy systems.

“Moving from licensing and planning into large-scale execution and infrastructure delivery, LEES 2027 is a focal point for this critical transformation in Libya’s energy sector,” says James Chester, CEO of LEES 2027 organizer Energy Capital & Power. “It will be a defining platform where investment commitments from 2026 are translated into measurable production, capacity expansion and long-term energy security outcomes.”

Join industry leaders at the Libya Energy & Economic Summit 2027 in Tripoli and explore investment opportunities in one of Africa’s most dynamic energy markets. LEES 2027 offers a premier platform for partnerships, innovation and sector growth. Visit www.LibyaSummit.com to secure your participation. To sponsor or participate as a delegate, please contact sales@energycapitalpower.com.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Energy Capital & Power.

Media files

.

June 4, 2026

Uganda: President delivers State of the Nation Address today

Source: APO

President Yoweri Museveni today delivers the State of the Nation Address to Parliament and the country.

This is the first State of the Nation Address in this term of the President and Parliament.

The State of the Nation Address is provided for under Article 101 (1) of the Constitution, which says: “the President shall, at the beginning of each session of Parliament, deliver to Parliament an address on the state of the nation.”

The House sitting which marks the start of the 1st Session of Parliament, will be held at the Kololo Ceremonial Grounds starting at 2.00pm.

Attendance of the event has been restricted to MPs, staff of Parliament and only a few selected persons, following guidelines put in place to prevent the spread of Ebola.

The event will be broadcast on selected radio, TV stations as well as online outlets.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Parliament of the Republic of Uganda.

Media files

.

June 4, 2026

South Africa, Kenya sign six new agreements to deepen cooperation

Source: Government of South Africa

South Africa, Kenya sign six new agreements to deepen cooperation

South Africa and Kenya have signed six new Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) aimed at strengthening cooperation in trade, maritime transport, skills development, gender equality, arts and culture, and sport, as the two countries move to deepen their strategic partnership.

The agreements were signed during Kenyan President William Ruto’s State Visit to South Africa on Thursday, bringing the total number of bilateral agreements and memoranda between the two countries to 34.

The new pacts form part of broader efforts by Pretoria and Nairobi to expand economic cooperation, boost intra-African trade and strengthen people-to-people ties.

Addressing a media briefing at the Union Buildings in Tshwane, President Cyril Ramaphosa said the agreements would provide a framework for enhanced collaboration between the two nations.

“The Memoranda of Understanding that we have just signed provide a legal framework to further expand our cooperation.”

President Ramaphosa said the agreements reflect the growing strength of bilateral relations and will support cooperation in a range of strategic sectors.

“This State Visit has further strengthened the bonds of friendship and cooperation between our two countries. It has laid a firm foundation for deeper collaboration in trade, investment, industrialisation, infrastructure development, skills development and regional integration,” President Ramaphosa said.

President Ruto also highlighted the significance of the agreements, describing them as a reflection of the expanding relationship between South Africa and Kenya.

“As a statement for growing ties, we have today witnessed the signing of six instruments,” he said.

The agreements come at a time when both countries are seeking to maximise opportunities presented by the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and strengthen regional economic integration.

Boosting trade and reducing barriers

Among the most significant agreements signed was a Memorandum of Understanding on the facilitation of trade through cooperation in standardisation, technical regulations, conformity assessment, accreditation and metrology.

The agreement is expected to improve market access for businesses in both countries by addressing technical barriers to trade and harmonising standards.

The pact supports ongoing efforts to increase bilateral trade and facilitate the movement of goods under the AfCFTA framework.

President Ramaphosa noted that South Africa and Kenya see the continental trade agreement as a critical instrument for economic growth and industrialisation.

“President Ruto and I agreed that the AfCFTA must serve as a catalyst for inclusive growth, industrialisation and job creation.”

The President said the agreement should help develop regional value chains, support manufacturing and create opportunities for entrepreneurs, women and young people across Africa.

President Ruto echoed these sentiments, saying both countries had agreed to tackle obstacles that continue to hinder trade. “We acknowledge that real obstacles still remain, including tariff and non-tariff barriers, limited market access, and regulatory constraints.”

He said trade ministers have been directed to accelerate efforts to remove these barriers and unlock the full potential of intra-African commerce.

Strengthening maritime cooperation

A second agreement on shipping and maritime cooperation seeks to improve collaboration in the maritime sector and enhance connectivity between East and Southern Africa.

The agreement is expected to strengthen logistics networks, facilitate trade flows and support implementation of the AfCFTA.

With Kenya serving as a gateway to East Africa and South Africa positioned as a major economic hub in Southern Africa, enhanced maritime cooperation is expected to improve the movement of goods and services across the continent.

President Ramaphosa described Kenya as a critical regional partner.

“South Africa appreciates Kenya’s key role as a gateway to East Africa and as one of the leading voices on matters of peace, security and development on the continent,” he said.

Advancing gender equality

The third agreement focuses on promoting partnership in gender equality and women empowerment.

The pact is expected to strengthen collaboration on policies and programmes aimed at improving women’s participation in economic activities, leadership, governance and entrepreneurship.

The agreement aligns with continental and global commitments to gender equality and inclusive development.

Both countries have identified women’s economic empowerment as an important driver of growth and social progress.

Expanding skills development

Another key agreement centres on cooperation in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET).

The MoU seeks to strengthen collaboration in skills development, curriculum design, vocational training and workforce preparedness.

The agreement comes as African countries increasingly prioritise skills development to address youth unemployment and equip young people for opportunities in emerging industries.

President Ramaphosa said South Africa and Kenya have agreed to deepen cooperation in skills transfer and human capital development.

The President noted that the Joint Trade Committee has underscored the importance of increased investment, industrial cooperation, skills transfer and technology exchange in strengthening economic ties.

Preserving culture and heritage

The fifth agreement focuses on arts, culture and heritage.

The pact aims to deepen cultural exchanges, preserve heritage resources and strengthen cooperation between artists, cultural institutions and creative industries in both countries.

The agreement is expected to contribute to greater people-to-people relations, while promoting African cultural identity and heritage.

South Africa and Kenya have long-standing historical ties rooted in solidarity during the struggle against colonialism and apartheid, making cultural cooperation a natural extension of their relationship.

Building partnerships through sport

The sixth agreement covers cooperation in sport and recreation.

The MoU is expected to promote exchanges between sporting bodies, facilitate athlete development programmes and encourage collaboration in sports administration and recreation initiatives.

The agreement comes as Kenya prepares to co-host the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations alongside Uganda and Tanzania.

During the media briefing, President Ramaphosa congratulated Kenya on securing hosting rights for the continental tournament.

“I also wish to extend my heartfelt congratulations to you, Your Excellency, and to the Republic of Kenya for being among the three nations chosen to host the Africa Cup of Nations next year, alongside Uganda and Tanzania. This is truly a proud and historic moment for East Africa,” the President said.

Strategic partnership gains momentum

The signing of the six agreements marks another milestone in relations between South Africa and Kenya, which have steadily expanded since diplomatic ties were re-established in 1994.

The two countries have developed one of the continent’s most significant bilateral partnerships, with cooperation spanning trade, investment, education, agriculture, tourism, defence, home affairs, transport and environmental management.

President Ruto said the agreements reflect a relationship that continues to evolve and mature.

“Over three decades, we have built one of the most impactful partnerships on the continent, grounded in mutual respect, shared values, and a common vision for the prosperity of our people,” he said.

Both leaders expressed confidence that the newly signed agreements will translate into tangible benefits for citizens, while advancing Africa’s broader goals of economic integration, industrialisation and sustainable development. – SAnews.gov.za

DikelediM
Thu, 06/04/2026 – 16:08

June 4, 2026

Gabon : Lancement du Programme National de Logements sociaux de Bikélé-Nzong

Source: Africa Press Organisation – French

Le 3ème pilier du projet de société du Chef de l’Etat Brice Clotaire OLIGUI NGUEMA devient une réalité à travers le lancement officiel des travaux de construction de logements sociaux de Bikélé-Nzong.

Une concrétisation du 3ème pilier de son projet de société consacré à l’amélioration des conditions de vie des Gabonais à travers l’accès au logement.

Par cet acte majeur, le Chef de l’Etat passe de la parole à l’acte et engage l’une des plus importantes politiques de logement social jamais mises en oeuvre dans notre pays.

Cette initiative traduit ici sa volonté de garantir à chaque Gabonais un accès digne à la propriété à travers une vision simple et ambitieuse : « Un Gabonais, un toit ».

Le programme prévoit la construction immédiate de 3 100 logements à Bikélé-Nzong, avant une extension progressive à travers le territoire national avec la réalisation de 5 000 logements supplémentaires sur les sept prochaines années, notamment en partenariat avec le groupe marocain Addoha.

Cette dynamique nationale est déjà engagée à l’intérieur du pays avec le lancement de 50 logements à Lambaréné, 50 à Makokou et 50 à Franceville, témoignant de la volonté des plus hautes autorités d’assurer une répartition équitable des opportunités de logement sur l’ensemble du territoire.

Contrairement aux dispositifs du passé, ce programme n’est pas exclusivement destiné aux agents publics. Il est ouvert à tous les Gabonais, qu’ils soient agents de l’Etat, salariés du secteur privé, travailleurs indépendants ou particuliers, dans le respect des critères définis par les administrations compétentes.

Le mécanisme retenu constitue une innovation sociale majeure. L’Etat réoriente la prime de logement vers l’acquisition d’un patrimoine durable.

Ainsi, aucun prélèvement ne sera effectué pendant la phase de construction. Ce n’est qu’à la remise effective des clés que le remboursement débutera. La prime de logement sera alors directement affectée au paiement du bien immobilier, permettant aux bénéficiaires d’accéder à la propriété sans effort financier supplémentaire et sans dégradation de leur pouvoir d’achat.

L’adhésion au programme repose sur une procédure transparente auprès du Ministère du Logement et de l’Habitat, avec le versement d’une caution sur un compte séquestre sécurisé. Plusieurs établissements bancaires partenaires se sont déjà engagés à accompagner les futurs bénéficiaires à travers des mécanismes de financement adaptés.

Par cette initiative historique, le Président de la République réaffirme son engagement en faveur de la justice sociale, de la dignité humaine et de l’amélioration durable du cadre de vie des populations.

La construction des logements sociaux de Bikélé-Nzong constitue ainsi une réponse concrète aux aspirations légitimes des Gabonais et une nouvelle illustration de la volonté du Chef de l’Etat de bâtir un Gabon plus inclusif, plus solidaire et davantage tourné vers le bien-être de ses citoyens.

Distribué par APO Group pour Présidence de la République Gabonaise.

June 4, 2026

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): Refugees in Eastern and Southern Africa remain in exile for nearly 16 years

Source: APO

Refugees in Eastern and Southern Africa remain in exile for a median period of almost 16 years, according to new analysis by UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, underscoring the urgent need to expand solutions.

The analysis, based on UNHCR’s registration data between 2001 and 2025, shows that displacement in the region is rarely short-term. At the end of 2025, 6.4 million refugees and asylum-seekers were recorded in UNHCR’s registration system across the region. Many had escaped war, instability and persecution in countries such as Sudan, South Sudan and Somalia, and continue to be hosted mainly by neighbouring countries, including Uganda, Ethiopia and Kenya. The data will form part of UNHCR’s 2025 Global Trends Report, with updated global displacement figures, to be released on 11 June.

“Asylum saves lives, but after nearly 16 years of living in limbo, refugees need more than help; they need hope, opportunity and a way forward,” said Mamadou Dian Balde, UNHCR Regional Director for Eastern and Southern Africa. “We need to move faster towards real solutions, helping refugees return home when it is safe to do so, and ensuring those who cannot return are able to study, work, support themselves and contribute to their communities.”

The data shows that most registered refugees and asylum-seekers in the region remain displaced long after the initial emergency, with three in four still displaced after five years and almost two in five still in asylum 20 years later.

Children and young adults are among the most affected. Refugees and asylum-seekers registered before the age of five remain in asylum for a median of over 18 years. This means many pass through early childhood, primary and secondary education and into adulthood without a solution.

“No child should have to grow up with their future clouded by uncertainty,” Balde said. “An entire generation of refugee children are starting their adult lives in exile. Young refugees need access to national education systems, documentation, skills and opportunities that will allow them to reach their potential wherever they are and contribute to the societies hosting them.”

The analysis also shows that larger families remain in asylum for longer, reflecting the complexity of finding solutions for entire households. Single people remain refugees or asylum-seekers for a median of just under six years, while families of five or more remain for nearly 19 years.

Women and girls also stay in asylum for a median duration of nearly 17 years, compared with just over 14 years for men and boys; a pattern that often reflects different protection risks, family responsibilities and barriers to mobility. UNHCR said the findings point to evidence that the impact of displacement on women and children lasts for a generation or more, laying a foundation for multi-generational dependency on aid.

Host countries in Eastern and Southern Africa continue to show solidarity and provide protection to millions of refugees despite limited resources. UNHCR is calling for donors, development actors and the private sector to step up support so that refugees and the communities that welcome them can rebuild and grow together in dignity.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).