Passation de service à la Présidence sous le signe de la continuité et de la consolidation

Source: Africa Press Organisation – French

L’Association Professionnelle des Banques et Établissements Financiers du Sénégal (APBEFS) (www.APBEF.sn) a procédé le 5 février à la passation de service entre la Présidente sortante, Madame Khady Boye HANNE, et le Président par intérim, Monsieur Sahid YALLOU. 

Madame Khady Boye HANNE a exercé successivement les fonctions de Première Vice-Présidente, puis, depuis le 14 janvier 2025, celles de Présidente de l’APBEFS, à la suite de son élection par acclamation. 

Son mandat a été marqué par un renforcement de la structuration interne de l’Association, une redynamisation de ses commissions techniques et un dialogue soutenu avec les autorités publiques et monétaires, dans un contexte de transformation du secteur bancaire. 

Sous sa présidence, l’APBEFS a notamment contribué au rapprochement entre les établissements bancaires et leurs usagers, à la promotion de mécanismes de financement adaptés aux PME/PMI, ainsi qu’à l’accompagnement des chantiers de modernisation et de digitalisation du secteur financier, en lien avec les institutions compétentes et les parties prenantes concernées. 

La communauté bancaire salue le travail accompli par Madame Khady Boye HANNE, ainsi que son engagement en faveur de la cohésion de la profession et du financement de l’économie sénégalaise. 

« La Présidence de l’APBEFS a été pour moi une responsabilité collective, exercée dans un esprit de dialogue, de rigueur et de service au secteur bancaire. Je me réjouis que les chantiers engagés puissent se poursuivre dans une dynamique de continuité et de renforcement du rôle des banques au service de l’économie sénégalaise », a déclaré Madame Khady Boye HANNE. 

La Présidence par intérim de l’APBEFS est désormais assurée par Monsieur Sahid YALLOU, qui occupait jusqu’alors les fonctions de Premier Vice-Président de l’Association. 

Directeur Général de Ecobank Sénégal, il dispose d’une solide expérience du secteur bancaire et d’une connaissance approfondie des enjeux liés au financement de l’économie, à la gestion des risques et à la modernisation des services financiers. Il assurera l’intérim de la Présidence jusqu’à la tenue de la prochaine élection, conformément aux statuts de l’Association. 

À travers cette transition, l’APBEFS réaffirme sa volonté de poursuivre les chantiers engagés, de renforcer le rôle du secteur bancaire dans le financement de l’économie nationale et de maintenir un dialogue constructif avec l’ensemble des parties prenantes, dans un esprit de responsabilité et d’amélioration continue. 

Distribué par APO Group pour Association Professionnelle des Banques et Établissements Financiers du Sénégal (APBEFS).

Contact presse : 
François KOUELI
Responsable communication & relations publiques
francois@globalmindconsulting.com
+221 772002049

À propos de l’APBEFS :
Créée en 1965, l’Association Professionnelle des Banques et Établissements Financiers du Sénégal (APBEFS) est l’organisation faîtière représentant les banques et établissements financiers exerçant au Sénégal. Elle veille à la défense des intérêts de la profession, à la promotion d’un secteur bancaire solide et responsable, ainsi qu’au dialogue permanent avec les autorités publiques et les parties prenantes économiques, en faveur du financement durable de l’économie nationale.

Media files

Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Conducts District Sensitization Tour in Sierra Leone

Source: APO – Report:

.

Led by the Minister of Planning and Economic Development, Madam Kenyeh Barlay, in company of the ECOWAS Resident Representative to Sierra Leone, H.E. Ambassador John Azumah, senior officials of the Ministry of Planning and Economic Development (MoPED), the ECOWAS National Office, the ECOWAS Political Advisor, a senior official of the National Early Warning and Response Mechanism Centre (NEWRMC), and a senior official from the Ministry of Trade and Commerce. The mission engaged in school sensitization sessions and district-level stakeholder meetings.

The sensitization tour covered Kambia District (Kambia), Koinadugu District (Kabala), Tonkolili District (Magburaka), and Kono District (Koidu). It adopted a two-track engagement approach comprising school-based sensitization sessions and district-level stakeholders’ meetings in each district.

At the school sensitization sessions, held in two secondary schools per district, students were introduced to ECOWAS’ mandate, history, and contributions to peace, education, youth empowerment, and regional integration. Interactive discussions and question-and-answer sessions allowed students to engage directly with the delegation and deepen their understanding of ECOWAS as a community of people.

Following the school engagements, district-level stakeholders’ meetings were convened with district authorities, traditional leaders, civil society organizations, youth and women’s groups, security actors, traders, persons with disability (PWD), and the media. Discussions focused on ECOWAS’ role in peace and security, democratic governance, trade facilitation, youth employment, women’s empowerment, food security, and regional economic integration, in line with ECOWAS Vision 2050: “ECOWAS of the People – Peace and Prosperity for All.”

In her remarks, the Minister of Planning and Economic Development highlighted the strong alignment between ECOWAS’ regional priorities and Sierra Leone’s national development agenda, while underscoring Sierra Leone’s active role within the Community. The ECOWAS Resident Representative reiterated ECOWAS’ commitment to strengthening peace, security, and socio-economic development placing people at the center of development, emphasizing that regional integration must deliver tangible benefits to ordinary citizens.

The participation of the National Early Warning and Response Mechanism reinforced discussions on preventive diplomacy and community-level security, while the Ministry of Trade and Commerce provided clarifications on ECOWAS trade instruments, including the ECOWAS Trade Liberalisation Scheme (ETLS) and regional market integration frameworks.

Across all districts visited, the tour recorded strong participation and high levels of engagement, with stakeholders expressing appreciation for ECOWAS’ continued presence and contributions to Sierra Leone’s peace, stability, and development. The mission also generated valuable feedback to inform future ECOWAS programming and district-level engagement strategies.

– on behalf of Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

New Nelson Mandela Rules Academy signals shift toward humanised corrections

Source: Government of South Africa

New Nelson Mandela Rules Academy signals shift toward humanised corrections

Exactly 36 years after President Nelson Mandela walked out of prison and into the pages of history, President Cyril Ramaphosa returned to the very grounds where that decisive moment unfolded, reaffirming South Africa’s commitment to justice anchored in human dignity.

Before the formalities began on Wednesday morning at Drakenstein Correctional Facility — where President Cyril Ramaphosa officially opened the Nelson Mandela Rules Training Academy — the First Citizen made a deeply personal pilgrimage to the Madiba House, the residence that housed Nelson Mandela during the final years of his imprisonment. 

It was here, on the grounds formerly known as Victor Verster Prison, that the world waited with bated breath for a man whose freedom would signal the dawn of democracy.

Standing within the same gates where the eyes of the world once converged, President Ramaphosa reflected on the anticipation, fear and hope that defined that moment.

“Leading up to this release, we were all in a moment of great excitement that our struggle was reaching a point of inflection, and with the release of the prisoners, we knew that a new era was opening up, a new opportunity was coming about, which would enable us to launch even much more positive and powerful phases of the struggle,” the President said. 

Later in the morning, the President officially opened the Nelson Mandela Rules Training Academy — the first of its kind on the African continent. He described the moment as both deeply personal and nationally significant.

“Thirty-six years ago – almost to the day – the eyes of the world were fixed on the gates just beyond where we stand now. They were waiting for the moment one man would walk out of the gates of history, and into legend.

“At around four-fifteen pm local time, Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, with Winnie Madikizela-Mandela beside him, walked out of the gates into the massive crowd that had gathered to greet him,” the President said during his speech. 

For President Ramaphosa, the memory is not distant history — it is lived experience. He spoke candidly of both inspiration and fear.

“This is a historic moment. It’s very moving for me, having been here to watch history unfolding. It was watching a legend move out of this place that had incarcerated him and kept him, and like a bird, Madiba could not be caged. He had to fly out,” he said. 

He also shared the lesser-known anxiety that accompanied that moment of triumph — the fear for Mandela’s safety.

“The only trepidation that I had, together with others, was his safety, because we knew that we didn’t want him to be under the safety protection of the apartheid regime. We feared that they would kill him… and so we wanted to have a separation with regards to the safety of this man, who was going to lead the nation,” the President said. 

In a remarkable recollection, the President revealed that he and Reverend Mkhatshwa even travelled to Sweden for training on how to protect President Mandela – a reflection of the uncertainty and responsibility that rested on young shoulders at the time.

“For us, that was a moment of great fear… But ahead of that, Reverend Mkhatshwa and I had gone to Sweden to be trained as people who could protect Nelson Mandela… They helped to prepare us how we would look after him,” the President said while laughing. 

For the President, that day remains profoundly personal.

“To have been there beside the father of our nation as he took his first steps as a free man, remains one of the greatest honours of my life. Few moments have marked me more than being witness – at close quarters, to the day that lit the path toward the birth of a new South Africa.”

Now, three and a half decades later, the President said Drakenstein once again stands at the centre of transformation.

“Today, the Drakenstein Correctional Facility once again stands at the threshold of a new chapter in our country’s history,” he said. 

The Nelson Mandela Rules Training Academy, he said, is more than brick and mortar.

“This is not merely a building, but a story. You are welcomed by striking artwork depicting Madiba’s art created by offenders themselves. This is not incidental. It is deeply symbolic. It reflects the very essence of rehabilitation. It is about unlocking human potential, creativity and self-worth,” the President said. 

He said it is a story rooted in dignity, in second chances, and in the belief that justice must be anchored in humanity. Having endured 27 years in prison, Madiba’s life embodied the principle that even those behind bars retain their inherent dignity.

“Madiba believed that offenders are deserving of dignity, respect and humane treatment, and that justice is not measured by how harshly we punish, but by how faithfully we uphold human dignity, even in the most difficult circumstances,” he said. 

The President confronted the national frustration over crime, acknowledging the temptation toward harsh retribution.

“We cannot talk about overcoming crime in South Africa without having a frank, honest conversation about the rehabilitation of offenders, their re-integration into society, and prevention of re-offending.  

“Our people are fed up with crime, and at most times are inclined to the ‘lock the door and throw away the key’ mentality when it comes to offenders. Yet, this will not serve us in the long term as a country,” the President said. 

He painted a sobering picture of the cycle of re-offending and the stigma ex-offenders face, including unemployment, untreated mental health challenges, broken trust, gang pressures and social isolation.

“Facing social stigma, an unwelcoming environment and social isolation, far too many return to a life of crime.”

The Academy, President Ramaphosa declared, seeks to change that trajectory.

“The Nelson Mandela Rules Training Academy is determined to break this cycle,” he said. 

As sunlight filtered across the grounds where Madiba once walked to freedom, the symbolism was unmistakable. From incarceration to liberation. From punishment to rehabilitation. From history to living legacy.

“This facility symbolises the humanisation of corrections, the elevation of dignity, and the global pursuit of justice rooted in humanity,” he said. 

In conclusion, the President paid tribute to the men and women of the Department of Correctional Services, who perform one of the most demanding and often unrecognised duties in the public service. 

“Your commitment affirms that even in the most difficult circumstances, our correctional system remains anchored in humanity, professionalism and service to the nation.

“May this academy stand as a living tribute to Nelson Mandela’s legacy. May it shape generations of correctional practitioners committed to dignity and reform,” he said. – SAnews.gov.za

DikelediM

5 views

“We are turning the corner” – President Ramaphosa ahead of SONA 2026

Source: Government of South Africa

“We are turning the corner” – President Ramaphosa ahead of SONA 2026

President Cyril Ramaphosa says while many South Africans believe the country is turning the corner, government remains mindful of the “huge problems” that still need urgent attention.

Speaking at the Drakenstein Correctional Facility ahead of the 2026 State of the Nation Address (SONA), the President reflected on the national mood and the tone South Africans can expect when he addresses the Joint Sitting of Parliament on Thursday evening.

Responding to a question on whether the “ship is turning” and if optimism would define his message, President Ramaphosa acknowledged the growing sentiment that the country is on an upward trajectory.

“…Many people do say that we are turning the corner. We’ve turned the corner, and things are beginning to look a lot better, but…. there are still huge problems that we have to deal with,” he said on Wednesday.

The President noted that the past decade has been particularly challenging for the country and its people. 

“The past… 10 years or so have been very difficult, and our people have gone through great challenges and great difficulties. We need to reflect on all of that, but we also need to reflect on what the future portends because this moment gives us an opportunity to look back, look at the present and look forward,” he said.

His remarks suggest that SONA 2026 will balance sober reflection with cautious hope, acknowledging progress while confronting persistent structural challenges.

When asked what would keep him up on the eve of the Address, the President struck a confident and light-hearted tone.

“Tonight, I’m going to have a very, very deep sleep, and I’m not going to be up. I want to be ready to deliver the speech. The speech is done and dusted,” he said.

President Ramaphosa will on Thursday, 12 February, deliver the State of the Nation Address to a Joint Sitting of the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) at Cape Town City Hall.

The State of the Nation Address is an annual overview delivered by the President to mobilise all sectors of society to secure ongoing development in the country. The Joint Sitting provides an opportunity for the President to reflect on progress made, highlight key achievements, flag challenges, and outline government’s policy direction and programme of action for the year ahead.

During SONA 2026, President Ramaphosa is expected to outline interventions for the coming financial year, deliberating on South Africa’s domestic priorities, as well as the country’s continental and international relations.

The State of the Nation Address remains an important national milestone, reinforcing the strength and resilience of South Africa’s constitutional democratic system.

The Address will take place at 19h00 at Cape Town City Hall in the Western Cape. – SAnews.gov.za

DikelediM

0 views

Public healthcare and contracting out: can it work? Global review presents some answers

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Zoheb Khan, Researcher, Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP); University of Johannesburg

Universal health coverage – ensuring everyone can get quality, affordable healthcare when they need it – is one of the targets of the Sustainable Development Goals.

But progress towards meeting this target has been elusive, especially in developing countries. In recent years, existing weaknesses in public health systems have been magnified by the COVID pandemic, strained public budgets, rising public debt and climate change-related risks.

An increasingly common governmental strategy for universal health coverage is to contract private companies or non-profit organisations to provide healthcare services on its behalf. Known as “contracting out”, it is often seen as a way to bypass perceived public sector inefficiencies and rigidities, and to use existing private sector infrastructure and resources to expand public service provision.

Some proponents of contracting out also believe that introducing competition and innovation would improve the quality of healthcare services. Those are principles often associated with markets.

But how does it work in practice? And does contracting affect opportunities for community participation, a cornerstone of primary healthcare and of democratic governance?

Our team of researchers in South Africa, Brazil and India conducted a global review of the evidence, analysing over 80 peer reviewed studies from around the world. We wanted to understand, firstly, whether contracting improved access, quality and equity in primary care. Health systems grounded in strong primary care typically perform better.

Secondly, we wanted to find out whether involving local communities in the governance (design and monitoring) of these contracts made a difference.

Our review painted a complex picture. On the positive side, the evidence was clear that contracting out often improved access to primary care. This was particularly true in peripheral or remote areas where the state’s reach and resources were limited.

However, the impact on service quality was far less clear.

On the community question, our research found that when communities had a real say in designing and monitoring contracts, the results were better. It helped to improve access and make services more responsive to local needs.

This global evidence has implications for South Africa as it grapples with extreme inequalities in health and the proposed introduction of the National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme. This envisages a healthcare system in which healthcare would be bought from a mix of public and private providers. Our research points to what the government would need to put in place for this to work.

Defining and measuring quality – and what we found

The complexity of the results in relation to quality is partly due to differences in how various studies and programmes measure it.

Ideally, quality should be measured by the effectiveness and relevance of services. In other words, whether they solve the healthcare problems they intend to and tackle actual needs. But often, service quality is assessed on the basis of whether contractors meet a set of narrowly defined targets, like numbers of patients seen and services delivered, rather than what the services achieve.

Quality can also be defined from the perspective of cost effectiveness, rather than public health objectives. This can produce incentives for contractors to cut costs and avoiding treating sicker patients.

In some cases in our review, as in parts of Brazil and India, contracting was associated with impressive improvements in health outcomes, such as reduced infant mortality. In others, quality stagnated or even declined from this perspective.

We also found that profiteering can take root when for-profit companies assume control of service provision and success is defined primarily in terms of shareholder value. In Brazil, contractors have to be non-profits for this reason.

An important influence on service quality is the state’s capacities in contract management. Is it able to design good contracts, quality indicators, payment systems and incentives? How well does it manage relationships and enforce terms?

The benefits of community participation

The most compelling evidence came from Brazil. It has set up legally mandated health councils composed of community members and health workers. They have powers to veto health plans and budgets.

Councils have often helped non-profit health providers to understand local needs, remove access barriers, and anticipate service delivery challenges.

Similar successes were noted in Iran. The country has set up “people’s boards of trustees” at health centres. These contribute to planning and outreach.

In Bolivia and India, initiatives involving community participation in the governance of services delivered by non-profit organisations were linked to improved maternal and child health outcomes.

However, effective participation requires resourcing, and the political will to ensure participation enables real influence.

States need to provide transparent, high-quality data on contractors’ performance, and invest in upskilling community partners to interpret complex contractual terms.

Community actors may also lack the confidence to engage with government and corporate officials, who are usually more powerful. Too often, participation is frustrated by technical glitches in fragmented reporting systems, a lack of cooperation from officials, and a focus on auditing finances rather than health outcomes as well.

What this means for South Africa’s NHI

The NHI Bill envisions the state as the single purchaser of healthcare services, buying care from a mix of public and private providers. This is, in essence, a massive nationwide contracting exercise.

Our research suggests that for it to succeed, two things are essential: state capacity needs to be built; and public participation must be embedded in the system.

For the NHI scheme to work the following is therefore needed:

  1. Building state capacity: The success of the NHI hinges on the state’s ability to contract effectively. This requires skilled officials who can design watertight contracts, manage complex supplier relationships, and monitor performance based on health outcomes, not just expenditure. Throughout our review, the dangers of weak or inexperienced purchasers of healthcare services are clear: spiralling costs, poor quality, and weak accountability.

  2. Embedding public participation: The NHI should adopt a rights-based, democratic approach to contracting rather than solely a technical one. Meaningfully involving the people that use contracted services improves those services. South Africa has a rich history of community governance structures and civil society advocacy in health. The NHI should give communities a formal role in setting priorities and holding service providers and organisations to account.

This is the best safeguard against the corruption and inefficiency that has plagued other state ventures and which has been frequently voiced as a concern in relation to the NHI in South Africa.

Jith JR, Surekha Garimella, Vinodkumar Rao and Parvathy Breeze were co-authors of the original research underlying this article.

– Public healthcare and contracting out: can it work? Global review presents some answers
– https://theconversation.com/public-healthcare-and-contracting-out-can-it-work-global-review-presents-some-answers-274464

Egypt: President El-Sisi Witnesses Swearing-in of the New Ministers

Source: APO


.

Today, at the Presidential Headquarters in Heliopolis, President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi witnessed the swearing-in of the new Deputy Prime Minister, ministers, and deputy ministers, in the presence of Prime Minister Dr. Mostafa Madbouly. 

The appointments were as follows:

  • Dr. Hussein Mohamed Ahmed Eissa, Deputy Prime Minister for Economic Affairs.
  • Lieutenant General Ashraf Salem Zaher Ali Mansour, Minister of Defense and Military Production.
  • Dr. Khaled Atef Abdel Ghaffar Mohamed, Minister of Health and Population.
  • Eng. Kamel Abdel Hadi Farag El-Wazir, Minister of Transport.
  • Dr. Manal Awad Mikhail Abu Ghattas, Minister of Local Development and Environment.
  • Dr. Badr Ahmed Mohamed Abdel Atty, Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Cooperation, and Egyptian Expatriates.
  • Eng. Randa Ali Saleh Fouad El-Menshawy, Minister of Housing, Utilities, and Urban Communities.
  • Eng. Raafat Abdel Aziz Fahmy Mohamed Amin Hindi, Minister of Communications and Information Technology.
  • Dr. Abdel Aziz Hassanein Mohamed Saad Qonsoah, Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research.
  • Dr. Mohamed Farid Mohamed Saleh, Minister of Investment and Foreign Trade.
  • Mr. Diaa Youssef Rashwan Ahmed, Minister of State for Media.
  • Dr. Salah Mohamed Saeed Mahmoud Soliman, Minister of State for Military Production.
  • Counselor Hany Hanna Sedra Azer, Minister for Parliamentary Affairs.
  • Counselor Mahmoud Mohamed Helmy Ahmed El-Sherif, Minister of Justice.
  • Mr. Hassan Raddad Ibrahim El-Sayed, Minister of Labour.
  • Dr. Gehan Mohamed Ibrahim Zaki, Minister of Culture.
  • Dr. Ahmed Mohamed Tawfik Rostom, Minister of Planning and Economic Development.
  • Mr. Gowhar Nabil Gowhar Mohamed, Minister of Youth and Sports.
  • Eng. Khaled Hashem Ali Maher, Minister of Industry.
  • Ambassador Mohamed Abu Bakr Saleh Fattah, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Cooperation, and Egyptian Expatriates for African Affairs.
  • Dr. Walid Abbas Abdel Qawi Othman, Deputy Minister of Housing, Utilities, and Urban Communities for Urban Communities.
  • Eng. Ahmed Omran Ahmed Omran, Deputy Minister of Housing, Utilities, and Urban Communities for Utilities.
  • Dr. Samar Mahmoud Abdel Wahed Ibrahim Al-Ahdal, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Cooperation, and Egyptian Expatriates for International Cooperation.

Spokesman for the Presidency Ambassador Mohamed El-Shennawy stated that Presidential Decree No. (75) of 2026 concerning the cabinet reshuffle stipulated in Article Four the abolition of the Ministry of Public Business Sector, and that the Prime Minister is to issue the necessary decisions regarding the resulting implications of this change.

Following the swearing-in ceremony of the new Deputy Prime Minister, ministers, and deputy ministers, a commemorative photo was taken with the President in the presence of the Prime Minister. Then, President El-Sisi held a meeting with the new cabinet members. At the outset, the President wished the Prime Minister, his deputy, the new ministers, and deputy ministers success in carrying out their duties.

President El-Sisi emphasized the necessity of striving diligently and according to objective standards to achieve merit and ensure institutional efficiency, conducting self-assessment and review, and maintaining continuous objective performance evaluation.The President reiterated the importance of focusing on human capital, qualifying cadres according to the highest standards to ensure the infusion of well-qualified new talent into state institutions and agencies, as well as the private sector. The President further underscored the need to continue development and reform within state institutions and to enlist specialists to achieve this purpose.

President El-Sisi highlighted the significance of the media’s role in raising awareness, countering rumors, elevating public taste, and encouraging creativity. The President reaffirmed his full support for the government and its officials in all efforts aimed at achieving the public good.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Presidency of the Arab Republic of Egypt.

Why the US can destroy terrorist camps in Nigeria, but not terrorism – security scholar

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Obasesam Okoi, Associate professor, University of St. Thomas

US military airstrikes on Islamic State-linked militants in north-western Nigeria on Christmas Day 2025 attracted global attention. The focus was on the international legal implications and whether the Nigerian government had consented to the strikes.

I’m a scholar of peace and security and have carried out research on Boko Haram’s protracted campaign of violence. The research shows that the group’s activities have produced extensive loss of life and material destruction, as well as large-scale internal displacement. This calls for integrated security, humanitarian and governance responses.

In my view, focusing on the airstrikes risks obscuring the real question: why does terrorism continue in Nigeria?

My argument is that it’s not the absence of military force. My research shows that the problem of continuing violence is rooted in the failure of governance at every level of society. Airstrikes don’t address the political, economic and social conditions that allow armed groups to survive, adapt and recruit.

Armed violence has expanded where state authority is exercised in predatory, selective or unaccountable ways. Terrorism in Nigeria has thrived because the state has too often failed to govern justly, consistently and credibly.

In north-east Nigeria, for example, counterterrorism efforts have been undermined where displaced civilians remain unable to return safely, and land disputes go unresolved. What’s needed is investment in civilian protection, and local reconciliation processes that rebuild trust between communities and the state.

Similar lessons can be seen in parts of the Lake Chad Basin, where humanitarian support and local governance reforms have proven more effective at stabilising communities than military operations alone.

Military force can play a role in containing armed groups. But it must be embedded in a broader project of political reconstruction, institutional accountability and social trust building. This means restoring the state’s presence not only through soldiers, but through reliable public services in communities most affected by violence and displacement.

Narratives, legitimacy and insecurity

Following the strike, President Donald Trump announced the operation in a social media post in moral and religious terms. He described the attack as retaliation against militants who had been killing Christians. He portrayed the strike as both morally necessary and strategically decisive.

That framing, reported widely by Reuters, and amplified through US media and social platforms, resonated strongly in Washington political discourse. Major US outlets, including CNN, noted that the reality of violence in Nigeria was more complex than a simple religious binary.

For their part, Nigerian officials emphasised sovereignty, coordination and the non-sectarian nature of insecurity in the country. In a statement reported by Reuters, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasised that terrorism in Nigeria affected citizens regardless of religion or ethnicity. It warned against narratives that could inflame sectarian divisions. According to the Nigerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs

terrorist violence in any form, whether directed at Christians, Muslims or other communities, remains an affront to Nigeria’s values and to international peace and security.

Where governance is fragile, externally imposed moral framing can deepen mistrust, sharpen social divisions and offer armed groups new narratives to exploit.

Framing insecurity as a religious war is analytically inaccurate. It is also strategically dangerous. Armed groups frequently rely on ideas like that to recruit, radicalise and justify violence.

External validation of these ideas, even unintentionally, can become a propaganda asset for militants operating in contexts of weak state legitimacy like Nigeria.

Military success is not security success

US military statements described the strike as having destroyed militant infrastructure and disrupted operations. Reports by Premium Times and Reuters indicated that camps and facilities had been hit. Yet public information about leadership casualties, command and control disruption, or financial networks remains limited.

Without clarity about what happened, claims of success offer little to Nigerians who continue to live with insecurity.

Tactical disruption can interrupt planning and movement, but it does not dismantle networks embedded in local economies of coercion, taxation and protection.

Getting to the heart of the problem

Militant violence in Nigeria is embedded in a wider landscape of state retreat, informal authority and survival economies. Large areas of rural territory in the north-east remain effectively ungoverned.

Security and justice are provided by armed actors and criminal networks, not the state. In such environments, terrorism is less an external invasion than a symptom of systemic institutional collapse.

Military interventions can disrupt these systems temporarily. But without restoring governance, they leave intact the structures that reproduce violence.

Government can restore governance by doing the following.

Political reconstruction: Rebuilding local institutions in ways that involve displaced populations, traditional leaders, women and youth, rather than relying solely on centralised state authority. Unemployment, land disputes and political exclusion have created conditions in which violence thrives. What’s needed is to reinvest in livelihoods, education and fair land governance.

Institutional accountability: This means restoring trust in the Nigerian state, particularly in conflict-affected communities where security forces are perceived as abusive or corrupt. Accountability mechanisms for investigating abuses and compensating victims are necessary. This requires transparent systems for managing humanitarian activities and reconstruction funds. Citizens can be more confident in state authority when they see corruption confronted and justice applied.

Social trust building: Community-based peacebuilding and inclusive reconstruction processes are essential for repairing social fractures. When people experience safety and dignity in their everyday lives, confidence in security institutions can return.

Counterterrorism success in Nigeria should not be measured solely by the number of insurgents neutralised, but by whether state authority emerges more legitimate than before. Durable peace will depend less on tactical military gains than on the restoration of public trust. That will happen through accountable governance, civilian protection and inclusive economic recovery.

– Why the US can destroy terrorist camps in Nigeria, but not terrorism – security scholar
– https://theconversation.com/why-the-us-can-destroy-terrorist-camps-in-nigeria-but-not-terrorism-security-scholar-274799

Chambre africaine de l’énergie (AEC) condamne la décision relative à Dawes Island, qu’elle considère comme un abus de pouvoir judiciaire menaçant la réforme nigériane des champs marginaux

Source: Africa Press Organisation – French

Une Haute Cour fédérale du Nigeria a rendu un jugement contre le ministère des Ressources pétrolières en faveur d’Eurafric Energy Limited, annulant la révocation en 2020 de la licence du champ marginal de Dawes Island, qui, après sa révocation, était détenue et exploitée par Petralon 54 Limited depuis 2022. Cette décision remet effectivement en cause la décision prise en 2020 par l’autorité de régulation de ne pas renouveler la licence d’Eurafric, qui avait expiré sans production commerciale après 17 ans. Un appel a depuis été interjeté par Petralon 54 Limited, avec un sursis à exécution en attendant la décision des tribunaux supérieurs. Pour le secteur amont nigérian, qui navigue déjà entre la reprise de la production et la mise en œuvre des réformes prévues par la loi sur l’industrie pétrolière (PIA), les implications vont bien au-delà d’un simple actif.

En tant que porte-parole du secteur énergétique africain, la Chambre africaine de l’énergie (AEC) condamne fermement la décision rendue à l’encontre du ministère des Ressources pétrolières et de Petralon, la considérant non seulement comme un affront aux entreprises nigérianes qui tentent de développer des champs marginaux, mais aussi comme un exemple flagrant d’abus de pouvoir judiciaire. La Chambre soutient fermement le ministère et Petralon, et demande que cette question soit résolue afin de permettre à Petralon de continuer à augmenter sa production, à monétiser l’actif et à soutenir les objectifs industriels à long terme du Nigeria.

Un exemple d’abus de pouvoir judiciaire

L’AEC est profondément préoccupée par le raisonnement juridique qui sous-tend le jugement. Une question centrale est l’application apparente des dispositions de la PIA – promulguée le 16 août 2021 – à des événements qui se sont produits avant son adoption. La licence de Dawes Island a expiré en avril 2019 et le régulateur a officiellement refusé son renouvellement en avril 2020, ces deux mesures ayant été prises en vertu du régime juridique en vigueur à l’époque. L’application rétroactive de la PIA risque de compromettre le principe de sécurité juridique qui sous-tend les investissements à long terme en amont. Les investisseurs engagent des capitaux sur la base de cadres réglementaires clairs, de conditions fiscales et d’une autorité de régulation.

La décision soulève également des préoccupations opérationnelles, notamment en ce qui concerne le traitement des quelque 62 000 barils produits lors d’un test de puits comme preuve de production commerciale. Dans la pratique établie en amont, les essais de puits constituent une évaluation technique des performances du réservoir et non le début d’une production commerciale durable, qui nécessite une confirmation réglementaire par le biais d’une autorisation technique. En outre, le fait de s’appuyer sur un accord de farm-out non signé pour établir un intérêt juridique exécutoire s’écarte des principes établis du droit des contrats, selon lesquels les documents non signés ne créent pas d’obligations contraignantes. Dans l’ensemble, cette décision risque de créer un précédent dans lequel les tribunaux inférieurs interviennent dans des affaires pétrolières techniquement complexes d’une manière incompatible avec la pratique réglementaire et la gouvernance fiscale.

L’engagement de Petralon en faveur de la production marginale

Suite à la désignation de l’actif dans le cadre de la licence de prospection pétrolière 259 (PPL 259), Petralon a rapidement pris des mesures pour s’acquitter de ses obligations. Les conditions de la licence imposent un engagement pour un seul puits, mais la société a déployé environ 60 millions de dollars pour forer deux nouveaux puits et mettre en place des installations de soutien afin de commencer la production dans un délai de 12 mois. Plus de 150 000 barils ont été produits et évacués vers le terminal de Bonny, le plus grand terminal d’exportation du Nigeria, et le versement des redevances à l’État a déjà commencé.

Le lancement du deuxième puits a été supervisé par Heineken Lokpobiri, ministre d’État chargé des ressources pétrolières (pétrole), en novembre 2025, ce qui témoigne de l’alignement entre l’opérateur et le gouvernement. Depuis, la société s’est engagée à doubler la production de l’actif, réaffirmant ainsi son engagement en faveur de la croissance pétrolière du Nigeria. Ces résultats contrastent fortement avec l’historique de non-production du champ. Les activités de Petralon démontrent l’efficacité de la politique nigériane « drill or drop » (forer ou abandonner) et de l’initiative plus large « Project One Million Barrels » (Projet un million de barils) – des réformes visant à garantir que les champs marginaux contribuent de manière significative à la production nationale. À l’heure où le Nigeria cherche activement à attirer de nouveaux capitaux en amont, il convient de renforcer – et non de déstabiliser – la mise en œuvre visible, la conformité et la génération de redevances.

« Petralon est une société indépendante nigériane qui a respecté toutes les règles, s’est conformée à toutes les réglementations et a travaillé main dans la main avec le gouvernement pour augmenter la production. Elle a foré. Elle a investi. Elle a payé des redevances. Elle a obtenu des résultats. Venir à ce moment-là et faire dérailler ces progrès est injuste et envoie un mauvais signal au marché », déclare NJ Ayuk, président exécutif de l’AEC.

Une histoire de développement

Petralon n’est pas un nouvel entrant spéculatif dans le secteur amont nigérian. Créée en 2014, la société a progressivement constitué un portefeuille diversifié d’actifs exploités et non exploités. Entre 2021 et 2022, Petralon a levé 60 millions de dollars de capitaux, renforçant ainsi son bilan et se positionnant pour une croissance en amont. Aujourd’hui, la société détient un champ exploité et deux actifs en eaux profondes non exploités.

Grâce à sa participation indirecte de 6,06 % dans Prime Oil & Gas, Petralon est exposée aux OML 127 et OML 130. L’OML 127 comprend le champ Agbami, tandis que l’OML 130 comprend les champs Akpo, Egina et Preowei, qui comptent parmi les actifs de production en eaux profondes les plus importants du Nigeria. Cette base de production souligne que Petralon n’est pas seulement un opérateur marginal, mais un acteur crédible du secteur amont nigérian, présent en eaux profondes, discipliné en matière de capital et aligné sur les cadres réglementaires.

« Il ne s’agit pas seulement d’un champ. Il s’agit de soutenir les entreprises nigérianes qui investissent au Nigeria, créent des emplois, augmentent la production et renforcent notre sécurité énergétique. Si les indépendants nigérians se retrouvent dans une situation précaire en raison de décisions judiciaires incohérentes, cela dissuadera les investissements locaux et internationaux », a ajouté M. Ayuk.

Distribué par APO Group pour African Energy Chamber.

Media files

Presidential Youth Employment Intervention continues to produce results

Source: Government of South Africa

Presidential Youth Employment Intervention continues to produce results

The Presidential Youth Employment Intervention (PYEI) has facilitated nearly 295 000 earning opportunities for youth during the third quarter of this financial year.

This according to Deputy Minister in the Presidency Nonceba Mhlauli who released the PYEI 2025/26 third quarter results in Cape Town on Wednesday.

The results cover the time span between October and December last year and show, amongst others, that:

  • Some 294 530 earning opportunity were secured
  • Over 11 000 work experience opportunities were created through partnerships with higher learning institutions and the private sector
  • More than 6 700 enterprise opportunities were provided to support youth entrepreneurship through the National Youth Development Agency (NYDA)

“Furthermore, our revitalised National Youth Service…continues to expand with 132 784 young people having been placed in paid service opportunities to date.

“These achievements show that the PYEI is not only growing in scale but also in length, diversity and sustainability of opportunities,” Mhlauli said.

She emphasised that the quarter’s most important milestone is the “continued success” of the Jobs Boost Fund.

The fund – which is in its pilot phase this financial year – is aimed at delivering high-quality jobs for previously excluded youth by incentivising skills providers to deliver appropriate skills development and support job readiness programmes and interventions.

“Over 9 170 young people have enrolled into this particular programme. Which means we have been able to exceed our target for this financial year.

“Of the young people enrolled in this programme, 7 200 young people have already been placed into jobs,” she said.

Young people are encouraged to take up the opportunities presented on the zero rated sayouth.mobi site where opportunities are listed. 

“You will find all opportunities related to every and anything youth related. On [the site], you will find earning and learning opportunities, access to work experience and enterprise support. You will receive work readiness support and guidance.

“This platform is designed to ensure that no young person is excluded because of cost, location or lack of access to information,” the Deputy Minister said.

Since inception, the PYEI has reached more than 5 million young people with 2.36 million earning opportunities facilitated through SA Youth and an additional 402 515 opportunities through the labour department’s Employment Services of South Africa (ESSA).

“The PYEI is part of a broader national effort to remove structural barriers to job creation and economic participation. We are building a South Africa where young people participate in the economy with dignity, agency and hope.

“The progress report we present today is encouraging but our work is far from complete. Youth unemployment remains one of the biggest challenges that we face as a nation but through partnership, innovation and persistence we are steadily expanding pathways to earning for millions of our young South Africans,” Mhlauli concluded. – SAnews.gov.za

NeoB

44 views

African Energy Chamber (AEC) Condemns Dawes Island Ruling as Judicial Overreach Threatening Nigeria’s Marginal Field Reform

Source: APO – Report:

A Federal High Court in Nigeria has delivered a judgement against the Ministry of Petroleum Resources in favor of Eurafric Energy Limited, reversing the 2020 revocation of the Dawes Island marginal field license, which post revocation has been held and developed by Petralon 54 Limited since 2022.  The ruling effectively challenges the regulator’s 2020 decision not to renew Eurafric’s license that had expired without commercial production after 17 years. An appeal has since been initiated by Petralon 54 Limited, with a stay of execution pending determination by higher courts. For Nigeria’s upstream sector – which is already navigating production recovery and reform implementation under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) – the implications extend far beyond a single asset.

As the voice of the African energy sector, the African Energy Chamber (AEC) strongly condemns the ruling carried down against the Ministry of Petroleum Resources and Petralon, recognizing it as not only an affront to Nigerian companies that are trying to develop marginal fields but also as a clear example of judicial overreach. The Chamber stands firmly with the Ministry and Petralon, calling for the issue to be resolved to pave the way for Petralon to continue increasing production, monetizing the asset and supporting Nigeria’s long-term industry goals.

An Example of Judicial Overreach

The AEC is deeply concerned by the legal reasoning underpinning the judgment. A central issue is the apparent application of provisions of the PIA – enacted on August 16, 2021 – to events that occurred prior to its passage. The Dawes Island license expired in April 2019, and the regulator formally declined renewal in April 2020 – both actions taken under the legal regime in force at the time. Applying the PIA retrospectively risks undermining the principle of legal certainty that underpins long-term upstream investment. Investors commit capital on the basis of clear statutory frameworks, fiscal terms and regulatory authority.

The ruling also raises operational concerns, particularly in its treatment of approximately 62,000 barrels produced during a well test as evidence of commercial production. In established upstream practice, well testing is a technical evaluation of reservoir performance – not the commencement of sustained commercial production, which requires regulatory confirmation through a technical allowable. Additionally, reliance on an unsigned farm-out agreement to establish enforceable legal interest departs from established contract law principles, under which unsigned documents do not create binding obligations. Taken together, the ruling risks setting a precedent where lower courts intervene in technically complex petroleum matters in a manner inconsistent with regulatory practice and fiscal governance.

Petralon’s Commitment to Marginal Production

Following the designation of the asset under Petroleum Prospecting License 259 (PPL 259), Petralon moved swiftly to execute its obligations. The licence terms compel a one-well commitment, yet and the company deployed approximately $60 million to drill two new wells and put in place support facilities to commence production within a 12-month period. More than 150,000 barrels have been produced and evacuated to the Bonny Terminal, Nigeria’s largest export terminal, and royalty payments have already commenced being remitted to the state.

The commencement of the second well was witnessed by Heineken Lokpobiri, Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Oil) in November 2025, signaling alignment between operator and government. The company has since committed to doubling production at the asset, reaffirming its dedication to Nigeria’s oil growth. These results stand in stark contrast to the field’s previous history of non-production. Petralon’s activities demonstrate the effectiveness of Nigeria’s “drill or drop” policy and the broader Project One Million Barrels initiative – reforms designed to ensure that marginal fields contribute meaningfully to national output. At a time when Nigeria is actively courting new upstream capital, visible execution, compliance and royalty generation should be reinforced – not destabilized.

“Petralon is a Nigerian independent that has followed every rule, complied with every regulation and worked hand-in-hand with government to increase production. They drilled. They invested. They paid royalties. They delivered results. To come at this time and derail that progress is unjust and sends the wrong signal to the market,” states NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman, AEC.

A History of Development

Petralon is not a speculative entrant into Nigeria’s upstream sector. Incorporated in 2014, the company has steadily built a diversified portfolio of operated and non-operated assets. Between 2021 and 2022, Petralon raised $60 million in capital, strengthening its balance sheet and positioning itself for upstream growth. Today, the company holds one operated field and two non-operated deepwater assets.

Through its indirect 6.06% shareholding in Prime Oil & Gas, Petralon has exposure to OML 127 and OML 130. OML 127 contains the Agbami field, while OML 130 includes the Akpo, Egina and Preowei fields – some of Nigeria’s most significant deepwater producing assets. This production base underscores that Petralon is not merely a marginal field operator but a credible Nigerian upstream participant with deepwater exposure, capital discipline and operational alignment with regulatory frameworks.

“This is not just about one field. It is about supporting Nigerian companies that are investing in Nigeria, creating jobs, increasing production and strengthening our energy security. If Nigerian independents are placed in a precarious position by inconsistent judicial decisions, it will deter both local and international investment,” Ayuk added. 

– on behalf of African Energy Chamber.

Media files

.