Senegal: A Decade of Unresolved Climate Displacement

Source: APO


.

Senegalese families remain in limbo in a site called Khar Yalla, a decade after coastal floods destroyed their homes, Human Rights Watch said today. Despite recent progress, the government has not yet provided displaced families with a permanent, durable solution.

The approximately 1,000 people who lost their homes to tidal surges in 2015 and 2016 lived in historic fishing communities on the Langue de Barbarie peninsula of the northern city of Saint-Louis. After the families lived in tents for months, local authorities moved them to Khar Yalla in late 2016, providing them with temporary occupation permits pending a permanent solution. Local and national authorities noted that because the site floods and lacks essential services, it is not fit for permanent habitation. Yet, nearly 10 years on and with the next flood season coming in September, the families have not been provided with an alternative and continue to face violations of their right to permanent, adequate housing. 

“A decade of living in uncertainty is an unacceptable reality for families already traumatized by climate displacement,” said Erica Bower, climate displacement researcher at Human Rights Watch. “The Senegalese government should provide families with the bare minimum for Khar Yalla to feel like home again: permanent permits to regularize their tenure.”

During a March 24-26, 2026 visit, Human Rights Watch found that some progress has been made since the publication of its August 2025 report about the situation. Around a dozen out of 68 households now have electricity, though the installation costs are prohibitive for many. Local and regional authorities are investigating the situation and have visited the Khar Yalla families for the first time in years.  

While these developments are encouraging, the Senegalese government should remedy the situation by providing families in Khar Yalla with permanent permits, paving a path towards a truly durable solution. Permanent permits would allow families to expand their overcrowded homes, complete their women’s center, build a wall to prevent floods, and pursue more dignified futures. 

Khar Yalla families are not alone. Hundreds of other families have been internally displaced across Senegal by coastal tidal surges. According to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Center, over 57,000 people were displaced by floods in Senegal in 2024 alone. As climate change accelerates, the number of people who are displaced by disasters and require a durable solution is likely to increase. 

Senegal has already invested more than many countries to support climate-displaced communities, but the authorities left the families in Khar Yalla out of those efforts. Khar Yalla’s experiences offer lessons about the process of planned relocation that should be considered in subsequent efforts. Such lessons include conducting a comprehensive census to identify those displaced the longest, selecting sites that are not flood prone, and providing families with permanent rather than temporary permits. 

Ad hoc, temporary, and reactive measures should not become the norm. To prevent poorly planned relocations from becoming protracted displacement, Senegal should plan ahead. This means systematically documenting lessons from existing cases and adopting legal frameworks to ensure that planned relocations are rights-respecting. 

Planned relocation for people displaced by climate change comes with serious risks and should be a last resort, while priority should be given to adaptation solutions that enable them to stay in their communities. Planning should respect human rights principles such as informed consent, meaningful participation, and nondiscrimination. A national policy framework on planned relocation should provide guidance on how to carry out these principles in practice, take comprehensive censuses of displaced peoples, and create criteria to ensure the sites selected fulfill beneficiaries’ rights.

Some governments, such as the Solomon Islands in the Pacific, have developed such standalone policies, and others such as Panama are in the process of developing national protocols. No country in Africa has yet taken this step. Senegal is uniquely positioned to set the standard for rights-respecting adaptation across Africa, Human Rights Watch said.

Given the recent announcement that the government is holding consultations about a possible climate change law, Senegal has an opportunity to create the legal foundation for a national decree on climate displacement and planned relocation. “Members of displaced communities like Khar Yalla should have a seat at the table as any laws and policies about their lived experiences are developed,” said Fatoumata Kine Mbodji from Lumière Synergie pour le Développement, a nongovernmental organization that works closely with fishing families in Saint-Louis.

The Senegalese government is obligated under national, regional, and international law to respect and fulfill people’s economic, social, and cultural rights and to protect them from reasonably foreseeable risks to their rights, including climate change impacts such as sea-level rise. Climate adaptation should be carried out in a manner that does not violate their rights. 

“The protracted crisis in Khar Yalla demonstrates that without a national policy, ad hoc relocations perpetuate precarity rather than provide durable solutions,” Bower said. “But with political will, Senegal can become a regional and global leader on this critical climate justice issue.”

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Human Rights Watch (HRW).

Uganda engages its diaspora in Japan on national policy framework for inclusive development

Source: APO


.

The Government of Uganda, through its Diaspora Services Department in collaboration with the Embassy of the Republic of Uganda in Tokyo, convened an outreach engagement with members of the Ugandan community in Japan to advance consultations on the formulation of a National Diaspora Policy. The dialogue, held on 29 March 2026 at TKP Garden City Chiba, forms part of a broader global effort to align diaspora contributions with Uganda’s long-term socio-economic transformation agenda.

The session brought together Ugandan professionals, students, and entrepreneurs residing across Japan, offering a platform for structured dialogue on the policy’s scope and priorities. Officials underscored that the emerging framework seeks to create a coherent mechanism through which Ugandans abroad can be more effectively engaged, empowered, and enabled to contribute to national development processes.

Leading the delegation, Ambassador J. M. Muhindo outlined the Government’s strategic approach, noting that the policy is intended to institutionalize diaspora participation in key sectors, including investment, skills transfer, and innovation. He highlighted plans for a comprehensive skills-mapping exercise aimed at identifying expertise within the diaspora and linking it to domestic development needs. This initiative, he explained, is expected to strengthen knowledge exchange, address critical skills gaps, and enhance Uganda’s competitiveness in an increasingly globalized economy.

Ambassador Muhindo further encouraged members of the Ugandan community in Japan to maintain active registration with the mission, emphasizing that accurate data facilitates efficient consular support and strengthens coordination between the diaspora and government institutions. He also called for greater cohesion within the community, noting that organized diaspora networks such as those observed in other global contexts have proven instrumental in leveraging economic and professional opportunities in host countries.

In her remarks, Amb. Tophace Kaahwa reaffirmed the mission’s commitment to supporting Ugandans in Japan through responsive consular services and targeted engagement initiatives. She highlighted ongoing efforts to deepen economic and commercial diplomacy, including promoting Uganda as a destination for trade, investment, and tourism within the Japanese market. The Ambassador underscored the critical role of the diaspora as partners in advancing bilateral relations and facilitating market linkages.

Participants contributed perspectives and recommendations to inform the policy drafting process, reflecting a shared interest in ensuring that the framework responds to the practical realities and aspirations of Ugandans abroad. The engagement concluded with a consensus to institutionalize regular diaspora dialogues in Japan, including the proposal to convene an annual Uganda Diaspora Convention on a rotational basis across major cities.  he hybrid format of the outreach enabled broad participation, allowing members unable to attend in person to engage virtually and submit their views. The consultation in Japan marks a significant step in Uganda’s inclusive approach to policy development, reinforcing the role of its global diaspora as an integral partner in national progress.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of The Republic of Uganda – Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Afreximbank soutient le Groupe Dangote dans son objectif visant à réaliser un chiffre d’affaires annuel de 100 milliards de dollars d’ici 2030

Source: Africa Press Organisation – French

La Banque Africaine d’Import-Export (Afreximbank) (www.Afreximbank.com) est heureuse d’annoncer son soutien au Groupe Dangote, qui entend étendre ses activités et porter son chiffre d’affaires à 100 milliards de dollars US d’ici 2030.

La direction du Groupe a présenté mardi 31 mars 2026 sa stratégie de croissance à long terme intitulée « Vision 2030 : Dynamiser le Groupe Dangote pour un succès à long terme », au conseil d’administration et à l’équipe de direction d’Afreximbank. Cette stratégie définit un ‑programme d’expansion en deux phases couvrant les périodes 2025-2028 et 2028-2030.

Au cours de la présentation, le Groupe Dangote a exposé ses projets visant à développer et à optimiser ses plateformes existantes, ainsi qu’à accroître ses capacités dans tous les secteurs d’activité. Parmi les initiatives clés figure l’augmentation de la capacité de Dangote Petroleum Refinery, qui passera de 650 000 barils par jour (bpj) à 1,4 million de bpj. En outre, le groupe a l’intention de quadrupler sa production d’engrais, la faisant passer de 3 millions de tonnes par an à 12 millions de tonnes par an, une initiative qui positionnerait le groupe comme le plus grand producteur mondial d’engrais à base d’urée.

La stratégie d’expansion prévoit une croissance rapide dans d’autres secteurs d’activité, y compris le ciment, le riz et la production  Au-delà de son portefeuille actuel, le Groupe a identifié de nouvelles opportunités d’investissement dans les infrastructures — notamment les ports et les pipelines — ainsi que dans le gaz, l’exploitation minière (en tant que porte d’entrée pour les exportations de minerais semi-transformés et à valeur ajoutée‑), les centres de données pour soutenir la transformation numérique et la résilience des entreprises en Afrique, et l’énergie, décrite comme le moteur de la transformation industrielle de l’Afrique.

Pour soutenir cette croissance sur les cinq prochaines années, le Groupe Dangote estime qu’il lui faudra au moins 40 milliards de dollars de nouveaux investissements pour concrétiser ses ambitions continentales.

Reconnaissant la valeur stratégique du partenariat avec Afreximbank, M. Aliko Dangote, Président-directeur général de Dangote Industries Limited, a déclaré : « Notre partenariat avec Afreximbank va au-delà d’un simple soutien financier ; il s’agit d’un rêve commun pour le continent. Lorsque nous avons entrepris de construire une raffinerie d’une capacité de 650 000 barils par jour – la plus grande de ce type en Afrique –, la Banque a cru en notre vision là où d’autres étaient sceptiques. Sans son leadership et sa confiance, le développement du continent africain n’en serait pas là où il en est aujourd’hui. Nous sommes étroitement liés à la Banque car nous partageons la même mission: développer les capacités locales, éliminer notre dépendance aux importations et faire en sorte que la croissance industrielle de l’Afrique soit impulsée par les Africains ».

Pour sa part, Dr George Elombi, Président d’Afreximbank et du conseil d’administration de la Banque, a souligné que ces engagements témoignaient d’une forte convergence d’objectifs visant à libérer l’Afrique de sa dépendance et à garantir que les ressources du continent soient utilisées au profit de ses populations. Il s’est dit convaincu que cette collaboration déboucherait sur « un formidable partenariat permettant de réaliser des investissements à grande échelle qui accéléreront les changements attendus », des changements qui ont pris un caractère d’urgence face à la fragmentation et au protectionnisme croissants à l’échelle mondiale.

Dr Elombi a rappelé qu’au début de la pandémie de COVID-19 en 2020, l’Afrique avait eu du mal à se procurer ne serait-ce que les équipements de protection de base en raison de capacités de production limitées, ajoutant que « même lorsque des financements étaient disponibles, nous ne pouvions pas accéder à ces articles essentiels ».

Il a en outre assuré qu’Afreximbank et son conseil d’administration étaient prêts à soutenir la concrétisation des aspirations du Groupe Dangote. « C’est précisément la raison d’être de notre institution. Comme cela est profondément ancré dans notre ADN, nous ne nous contentons pas d’écouter : nous agissons et transformons les aspirations en actions ». 

L’événement a également été marqué par la signature d’un accord portant sur une Facilité de 2,5 milliards de dollars US garantie par Afreximbank, dans le cadre d’un prêt syndiqué senior à terme de 4 milliards de dollars US en faveur de Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE.

Distribué par APO Group pour Afreximbank.

Contact Presse : 
Vincent Musumba 
Responsable de la communication et de la gestion événementielle (Relations presse) 
Courriel : press@afreximbank.com 

Suivez-nous sur : 
X : https://apo-opa.co/4sUu6WZ 
Facebook : https://apo-opa.co/4sixqKf# 
LinkedIn : https://apo-opa.co/4t35ICG 
Instagram : https://apo-opa.co/48kIsYk 

À propos d’Afreximbank :
La Banque Africaine d’Import-Export (Afreximbank) est une institution financière multilatérale panafricaine dédiée au financement et à la promotion du commerce intra et extra-africain. Depuis 30 ans, Afreximbank déploie des structures innovantes pour fournir des solutions de financement qui facilitent la transformation de la structure du commerce africain et accélèrent l’industrialisation et le commerce intrarégional, soutenant ainsi l’expansion économique en Afrique. Fervente défenseur de l’Accord sur la Zone de Libre-Échange Continentale Africaine (ZLECAf), Afreximbank a lancé les le Système panafricain de paiement et de règlement (PAPSS) qui a été adopté par l’Union africaine (UA) comme la plateforme de paiement et de règlement devant appuyer la mise en œuvre de la ZLECAf. En collaboration avec le Secrétariat de la ZLECAf et l’UA, la Banque a mis en place un Fonds d’ajustement de 10 milliards de dollars US pour aider les pays à participer de manière effective à la ZLECAf. À la fin de décembre 2025, le total des actifs et des garanties de la Banque s’élevait à environ 48,5 milliards de dollars US et les fonds de ses actionnaires s’établissaient à 8,4 milliards de dollars US. Afreximbank est notée A par GCR International Scale, Baa1 par Moody’s, AAA par China Chengxin International Credit Rating Co., Ltd (CCXI), A- par Japan Credit Rating Agency (JCR). Au fil des ans, Afreximbank est devenue un groupe constitué de la Banque, de sa filiale de financement à impact appelée Fonds de développement des exportations en Afrique (FEDA), et de sa filiale de gestion d’assurance, AfrexInsure, (les trois entités forment « le Groupe »). La Banque a son siège social au Caire, en Égypte.

Pour de plus amples informations, veuillez visiter www.Afreximbank.com

Media files

Afreximbank supports Dangote Group as it targets US$100 billion annual revenue by 2030

Source: APO

African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) (www.Afreximbank.com) is proud to announce that it is supporting Dangote Group, as it seeks to expand its operations and grow its turnover to US$100 billion by 2030.

The Group’s leadership presented its long-term growth strategy “Vision 2030: Supercharging Dangote Group for Long Term Success” to the Afreximbank Board of Directors and its executive team on Tuesday, 31 March 2026. The strategy outlines a two‑phase expansion programme spanning 2025–2028 and 2028–2030.

During the presentation, Dangote Group outlined plans to scale and optimise its existing platforms and expand capacity across all active sectors. Key initiatives include increasing the capacity of the Dangote Petroleum Refinery from 650,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 1.4 million bpd. Additionally, the Group intends to quadruple its Fertiliser production from 3 million tonnes per annum to 12 million tonnes per annum, a move that would position the Group as the world’s largest producer of urea fertiliser.

The expansion strategy encompasses rapid growth across other business lines, including cement, rice, and broader food production. Beyond its current portfolio, the Group identified new investment opportunities in infrastructure — including ports and pipelines — as well as gas, mining (as a gateway for semi‑processed and value‑added mineral exports), data centres to support Africa’s digital transformation and enterprise resilience, and power, described as the engine of Africa’s industrial transformation.

To drive the growth over the five years, the Dangote Group predicts that it will require at least $40 billion in new investments to realise its continental ambitions.

Recognising the strategic value of the partnership with Afreximbank, Mr. Aliko Dangote, President/Chief Executive, Dangote Industries Limited said: “Our partnership with Afreximbank is more than financial support; it is about a shared dream for the continent. When we set out to build a 650,000 barrel-per-day refinery—the largest of its kind in Africa—the Bank believed in our vision when others were sceptical. Without their leadership and trust, the development of the African continent would not be where it is today. We are joined at the hip with the bank because we share the same mission: to drive local capacity, eliminate our dependence on imports, and ensure Africa’s industrial growth is led by Africans.”

On his part, Dr. George Elombi, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Afreximbank, noted that the engagements demonstrated a strong convergence of purpose to free Africa from dependency and to ensure the continent’s resources are used to the benefit of its people. He expressed confidence that the collaboration would lead to “a formidable bond of partnership to make large-scale investments that will accelerate the changes we desire,” changes that have gained urgency amid increasing global fragmentation and protectionism.

Dr. Elombi recalled that at the onset of COVID 19 pandemic in 2020, Africa struggled to secure even the basic protective materials due to limited production capacity, adding that “even when financing was available, we could not access these essential items.”

He further pledged the readiness of Afreximbank and its Board of Directors to support the realisation of Dangote Group’s aspirations. “This is the very purpose for which our institution was created. As is deeply rooted in our DNA, we do not only listen—we execute and convert aspiration into action,”

The event also featured the signing of the agreement for US$2.5-billion facility underwritten by Afreximbank as part of a US$4-billion senior syndicated term loan in favour of Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Afreximbank.

Media Contact: 
Vincent Musumba 
Communications and Events Manager (Media Relations) 
Email: press@afreximbank.com 

Follow us on: 
X: https://apo-opa.co/4sUu6WZ 
Facebook: https://apo-opa.co/4sixqKf# 
LinkedIn: https://apo-opa.co/4t35ICG 
Instagram: https://apo-opa.co/48kIsYk 

About Afreximbank:
African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) is a Pan-African multilateral financial institution mandated to finance and promote intra- and extra-African trade. For over 30 years, the Bank has been deploying innovative structures to deliver financing solutions that support the transformation of the structure of Africa’s trade, accelerating industrialisation and intra-regional trade, thereby boosting economic expansion in Africa. A stalwart supporter of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA), Afreximbank has launched a Pan-African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS) that was adopted by the African Union (AU) as the payment and settlement platform to underpin the implementation of the AfCFTA. Working with the AfCFTA Secretariat and the AU, the Bank has set up a US$10 billion Adjustment Fund to support countries effectively participating in the AfCFTA. At the end of December 2025, Afreximbank’s total assets and contingencies stood at over US$48.5 billion, and its shareholder funds amounted to US$8.4 billion. Afreximbank has investment grade ratings assigned by GCR (international scale) (A), Moody’s (Baa1), China Chengxin International Credit Rating Co., Ltd (CCXI) (AAA), Japan Credit Rating Agency (JCR) (A-). Afreximbank has evolved into a group entity comprising the Bank, its equity impact fund subsidiary called the Fund for Export Development Africa (FEDA), and its insurance management subsidiary, AfrexInsure (together, “the Group”). The Bank is headquartered in Cairo, Egypt.

For more information, visit: www.Afreximbank.com

Media files

.

O Afréximbank apoia o Grupo Dangote na sua meta de atingir uma receita anual de 100 mil milhões de USD até 2030

Source: Africa Press Organisation – Portuguese –

O Banco Africano de Exportação e Importação (Afreximbank) (www.Afreximbank.com) tem o prazer de anunciar que está a apoiar o Grupo Dangote nos seus esforços para expandir as suas operações e aumentar o seu volume de negócios para 100 mil milhões de USD até 2030.

A liderança do Grupo apresentou a sua estratégia de crescimento a longo prazo “Visão 2030: Impulsionar o Grupo Dangote para o Sucesso a Longo Prazo” ao Conselho de Administração do Afreximbank e à sua equipa executiva na Terça-feira, dia 31 de Março de 2026. A estratégia delineia um programa de expansão em duas fases, abrangendo os períodos de 2025–2028 e 2028–2030.

Durante a apresentação, o Grupo Dangote delineou planos para ampliar e optimizar as suas plataformas existentes e expandir a capacidade em todos os sectores activos. As principais iniciativas incluem o aumento da capacidade da Refinaria de Petróleo Dangote de 650.000 barris por dia (bpd) para 1,4 milhões de bpd. Além disso, o Grupo pretende quadruplicar a sua produção de fertilizantes de 3 milhões de toneladas por ano para 12 milhões de toneladas por ano, uma medida que posicionaria o Grupo como o maior produtor mundial de fertilizantes à base de ureia.

A estratégia de expansão abrange um rápido crescimento noutras linhas de actividade, incluindo cimento, arroz e produção alimentar em geral. Para além da sua carteira actual, o Grupo identificou novas oportunidades de investimento em infra-estruturas – incluindo portos e oleodutos – bem como gás, mineração (como porta de entrada para exportações de minerais semiprocessados e de valor acrescentado), centros de dados para apoiar a transformação digital e a resiliência empresarial de África, e energia, descrita como a força motriz da transformação industrial de Africa.

Para impulsionar o crescimento ao longo dos próximos cinco anos, o Grupo Dangote prevê que serão necessários, pelo menos, 40 mil milhões de USD em novos investimentos para concretizar as suas ambições continentais.

Reconhecendo o valor estratégico da parceria com o Afreximbank, o Sr. Aliko Dangote, Presidente e Director Executivo da Dangote Industries Limited, afirmou: “A nossa parceria com o Afreximbank é mais do que um apoio financeiro; trata-se de um sonho comum para o continente. Quando nos propusemos a construir uma refinaria com capacidade para 650.000 barris por dia – a maior do género em África – o Banco acreditou na nossa visão quando outros se mostravam cépticos. Sem a sua liderança e confiança, o desenvolvimento do continente africano não estaria onde está hoje. Estamos intimamente ligados ao banco porque partilhamos a mesma missão: impulsionar a capacidade local, eliminar a nossa dependência das importações e garantir que o crescimento industrial de África seja liderado por africanos.”

Por seu lado, o Dr. George Elombi, Presidente e Presidente do Conselho de Administração do Afreximbank, observou que os compromissos demonstravam uma forte convergência de objectivos para livrar África da dependência e garantir que os recursos do continente sejam utilizados em benefício da sua população. Mostrou-se confiante de que a colaboração conduziria a “uma parceria sólida para realizar investimentos em grande escala que irão acelerar as mudanças que desejamos”, mudanças que se tornaram urgentes num contexto de crescente fragmentação global e proteccionismo.

O Dr. Elombi recordou que, no início da pandemia da COVID-19 em 2020, África teve dificuldades em garantir até mesmo os materiais de protecção básicos devido à capacidade de produção limitada, acrescentando que “mesmo quando havia financiamento disponível, não conseguíamos aceder a estes artigos essenciais”.

Comprometeu-se ainda a garantir a disponibilidade do Afreximbank e do seu Conselho de Administração para apoiar a concretização das aspirações do Grupo Dangote. “Este é precisamente o propósito para o qual a nossa instituição foi criada. Tal como está profundamente enraizado no nosso ADN, não nos limitamos a ouvir – executamos e convertemos a aspiração em acção,”

O evento contou ainda com a assinatura do acordo para uma linha de crédito de 2,5 mil milhões de USD garantida pelo Afreximbank, como parte de um empréstimo a prazo sindicado sénior de 4 mil milhões de USD a favor da Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE.

Distribuído pelo Grupo APO para Afreximbank.

Contacto para a Imprensa: 
Vincent Musumba 
Gestor de Comunicações e Eventos (Relações com a Imprensa) 
Correio Electrónico: press@afreximbank.com 

Siga-nos no:  
X: https://apo-opa.co/4sUu6WZ 
Facebook: https://apo-opa.co/4sixqKf# 
LinkedIn: https://apo-opa.co/4t35ICG 
Instagram: https://apo-opa.co/48kIsYk 

Sobre o Afreximbank:
O Banco Africano de Exportação e Importação (Afreximbank) é uma instituição financeira multilateral pan-africana com mandato para financiar e promover o comércio intra e extra-africano. Há mais de 30 anos que o Banco utiliza estruturas inovadoras para oferecer soluções de financiamento que apoiam a transformação da estrutura do comércio africano, acelerando a industrialização e o comércio intra-regional, impulsionando assim a expansão económica em África. Apoiante firme do Acordo de Comércio Livre Continental Africano (ACLCA), o Afreximbank lançou um Sistema Pan-Africano de Pagamento e Liquidação (PAPSS) que foi adoptado pela União Africana (UA) como plataforma de pagamento e liquidação para sustentar a implementação da ZCLCA. Em colaboração com o Secretariado da ZCLCA e a UA, o Banco criou um Fundo de Ajustamento de 10 mil milhões de dólares para apoiar os países que participam de forma efectiva na ZCLCA. No final de Dezembro de 2024, o total de activos e contingências do Afreximbank ascendia a mais de 40,1 mil milhões de dólares e os seus fundos de accionistas a 7,2 mil milhões de dólares. O Afreximbank tem notações de grau de investimento atribuídas pela GCR (escala internacional) (A), Moody’s (Baa1), China Chengxin International Credit Rating Co., Ltd (CCXI) (AAA), Japan Credit Rating Agency (JCR) (A-). O Afreximbank evoluiu para uma entidade de grupo que inclui o Banco, a sua subsidiária de fundo de impacto de acções, denominada Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Exportações em África (FEDA), e a sua subsidiária de gestão de seguros, AfrexInsure (em conjunto, “o Grupo”). O Banco tem a sua sede em Cairo, Egipto.

Para mais informações, visite: www.Afreximbank.com.

Media files

Baixar .tipo

President Cyril Ramaphosa to visit Kusile Power Station

Source: President of South Africa –

President Cyril Ramaphosa will on Friday, 10 April 2026, visit Eskom’s Kusile Power Station in Nkangala District Municipality, Mpumalanga.

The President will be accompanied by Minister of Electricity and Energy, Dr. Kgosientsho Ramokgopa, and Eskom management. 

This visit allows the President to witness progress made in restoring the nation’s energy security.

The President will be provided with a comprehensive operational briefing from Eskom’s leadership and technical teams.

The briefing will highlight the tangible advancements towards enhanced generation capacity. 

The President’s visit will affirm the dedication shown by the engineers, technicians, and workers at Kusile Power Station who were instrumental in the Eskom generation recovery efforts.

The President will interact with all Eskom Power Station General Managers at the event.

Details of the visit are as follows:

Date: Friday, 10 April 2026
Time: 10h00
Venue: Kusile Power Station, Nkangala District, Mpumalanga

NB: Note that all media related queries MUST be directed at Eskom and not The Presidency.

Media Accreditation details:

Media representatives interested in covering the President’s visit are invited to submit their details (Full Name, Media House, ID/Passport Number) to Eskom Media Desk at mediadesk@eskom.co.za. Deadline for Accreditation is Thursday, 9 April 2026 at 12h00.

Note to Editors:

As Kusile Power Station is designated as a National Key Point, strict safety and security protocols will be enforced. All media personnel are required to wear safety shoes or flat, closed-toe shoes. Hard hats and reflective vests will be supplied on-site.

Media enquiries: Vincent Magwenya, Spokesperson to the President – media@presidency.gov.za

Issued by: The Presidency
Pretoria

Credit and credibility: rating agency errors come with a cost

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Misheck Mutize, Post Doctoral Researcher, Graduate School of Business (GSB), University of Cape Town

The rating agency S&P Global’s Africa Credit Rating Trends 2025 reviews the past year’s rating activities and analyses the continent’s prospects for 2026. It is an important document because it interprets underlying drivers of creditworthiness. It shapes how global investors and policymakers understand risk, opportunity and reform dynamics across the continent.

But the document had some serious flaws in it. As someone who has been researching Africa’s capital markets and the institutions that govern them for decades, I believe they are worth commenting on because mistakes like this can influence investor perceptions. In turn, this can reinforce existing biases and affect how African economies are priced in global financial markets.

Firstly, there were several basic errors. Burundi was mislabelled as Uganda. Sudan and South Sudan were merged into a single country despite being separated since 2011.

The report also displayed a non-existent lake in the Great Lakes region and the Republic of the Congo was casually referred to by its unofficial name, Congo Brazzaville. The agency also presented the continent as having 54 countries, excluding the Sahrawi Republic, which is recognised by the African Union.

At first glance, these errors may seem like minor technical mistakes or editorial lapses in a document focused on financial analysis. But that reading misses the deeper issue. These are not just errors on a map. Errors like this raise questions about the accuracy, depth and rigour of the research and analytical processes behind the credit rating reports that move billions of dollars across the globe.

Systematic risk overestimation is what has led to African countries being penalised with higher interest rates and limited financing options. In effect, seemingly small errors have translated into real economic costs for African economies.

Moody’s made such errors in the past. It issued speculative downgrades for Kenya and Nigeria that it reversed within six and 12 months, respectively. One speculative commentary by Moody’s cost Kenya over US$150 million in a derailed bond buyback programme.

The gaps

At the core of these research shortcomings is a simple but consequential reality – limited presence on the ground.

S&P Global has an office in South Africa from which the team is expected to cover the whole continent. In addition, most of its rating analysts are based in Europe and Asia. These analysts visit the countries they rate for a maximum of two weeks in a year. These short visits and inadequate consultations have resulted in risk assessments based on conservative assumptions, desktop research and publicly available information.

S&P Global has been rating Uganda since December 2008. Yet its researchers still confuse the country’s location on the map.

This matters because global investors who engage Africa from a distance often operate with a cautious instinct. They still, erroneously, perceive Africa as a single, homogeneous risk bloc rather than 55 distinctive sovereigns with different risk dynamics.

Such geographical inaccuracies inadvertently validate this flawed narrative and risk perception, feeding into the misperceptions that distort capital allocation and inflate borrowing costs.

Another flaw the mistakes in the report illustrate is weak internal controls.

In global institutions like S&P Global, it is assumed that every publication undergoes multiple layers of quality assurance and editorial scrutiny. If such fundamental inaccuracies can pass through these filters, what about an analyst’s own assumptions that are embedded in sovereign risk models?

Is it possible that such errors escape scrutiny?

What is also worrying is how S&P Global responded to this issue when it was raised. The errors were flagged repeatedly on S&P Global’s social media platforms after the report was published, yet they remained uncorrected for nearly two weeks.

That delay was telling. It is fair to argue that these inaccuracies did not trigger the required urgency or institutional reflex because they concerned Africa. The corrections would most likely have been immediate, accompanied by formal apologies and internal reviews, if they had involved more powerful or closely watched regions. For example, if such a report had a map combining North and South Korea as one country or mislabelled Germany as France.

The reputational stakes would have been too high for the rating agency to ignore.

Way forward

Africa should not remain on the sidelines while its narrative is being driven by institutions that keep demonstrating a superficial understanding of its fundamentals.

One clear solution, in my view, is the establishment of an African credit rating agency to rebalance the narrative.


Read more: Africa’s new credit rating agency could change the rules of the game. Here’s how


But more needs to be done. Here are three solutions.

First, African governments must move from being passive recipients of ratings to active engagement with analysts. Where justified, they must contest assumptions, methodologies and errors. Engagement should not begin after a downgrade. It must be continuous, technical and evidence-based with credible and timely data about their economies.

Second, global institutions such as S&P Global must recalibrate their approach in dealing with Africa. Credibility is derived from consistent accuracy and timely responsiveness. They must invest in permanent senior research and analytical presence on the continent, not episodic visits. It means expanding consultation beyond a narrow set of stakeholders to include local economists, market practitioners and independent researchers. More important, strengthening internal quality controls so that basic errors do not undermine the integrity of complex analytical outputs.

Perception continues to move faster than data, and negative narratives travel further than positive fundamentals. That is why African countries must insist on analytical rigour, demand accountability and build their own capacity to interpret risk.

– Credit and credibility: rating agency errors come with a cost
– https://theconversation.com/credit-and-credibility-rating-agency-errors-come-with-a-cost-279672

Countries suffer when credit rating agencies lack data: how to fix the problem at source

Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Daniel Cash, Senior Fellow, United Nations University; Aston University

Some developing country governments spend years making the reforms that international financial institutions want – only to find that their efforts are not rewarded.

They may make budgets more transparent, publish their debt obligations, set up independent bodies to monitor government spending, and complete an International Monetary Fund programme, but still receive the same ratings from credit agencies. Borrowing costs remain high.

The gap between what countries have built and how that progress is reflected in credit ratings and market pricing is persistent and has consequences. It translates into higher borrowing costs, tighter fiscal space, and fewer resources for public investment.

The standard explanation points to bias in method – that credit rating agencies undervalue developing country institutions or rely on indicators that favour the global north.

There is some truth in this observation, and reformers have tried solutions like more agencies, methodology reviews and transparency codes. But these don’t tackle a deeper structural problem.

Based on my work as a researcher on the working of rating agencies, it’s clear that in practice, assessments of developing countries are often made on the basis of incomplete or fragmented information. Data sits in different institutions across the country, is not always produced to a common standard, and is frequently assembled under time pressure ahead of rating reviews. What reaches external assessors is therefore, at best, a partial view of the country’s institutional and fiscal position.

The issue was a major point of discussion at the United Nations in late March 2026 when delegates convened for the inaugural special meeting on credit ratings.

A recurring theme across the discussions was the need to look upstream – at what needs to exist before the rating process actually begins. Then assessments might more accurately reflect the infrastructure that developing countries have built.

That is a meaningful shift. It moves away from demanding that credit rating agencies behave differently, and towards asking what the system as a whole needs to provide. Upstream is where the problem originates and where the most concrete action is possible.

The debate suggests a shift in how key actors, including the United Nations, multilateral development banks and sovereign borrowers themselves, are approaching the problem. This could begin to change how institutional progress is translated into credit assessments and, over time, into borrowing costs.

Constructing a country’s credit story

A sovereign credit rating is not solely formed inside a credit rating agency. It takes shape in the months and years before an analyst arrives. It happens across finance ministries, central banks, statistical offices, debt management offices and audit institutions. It’s a process of data assembly, verification and presentation that most developing country governments have never had the capacity to manage systematically.

Before a rating is issued, a country’s credit story must be constructed. Fiscal data must be gathered, reform trajectories documented, institutional changes verified and contingent liabilities disclosed. A debt management office holds one part of the picture. A central bank holds another. A statistical office holds a third.

When those parts are properly coordinated, the credit story arrives at the assessment stage in verifiable form. When they are not, documentation has to be pulled together reactively before a rating deadline, and the story arrives incomplete.

Put simply, the analyst cannot reconstruct what was never assembled. Facing incomplete information, even where the core data required is broadly similar across countries, the rational response is often conservative assessment. The uncertainty premium stays elevated, and any reforms go unrecognised – not because they did not happen, but because the system required to make it visible was never built.

This upstream process can be understood as sovereign credit formation. If it’s weak, and external assessors can’t see what genuine progress has been made, there’s a formation gap. The formation gap does not mean that all low ratings are unwarranted. It simply means the system currently has no reliable way to tell the difference between a sovereign with weak fundamentals and one with strong yet largely invisible institutions.

No actor in the current system has the mandate or the incentive to build that upstream infrastructure on behalf of the countries that need it most. That is the problem.

On top of this, developing country governments are being asked to reform in ways that will take sustained investment in institutional capacity. Better data systems; coordinated institutions; clearer evidence. That investment takes years, diverts scarce resources, and demands political commitment across electoral cycles. It is being asked of governments that don’t have the fiscal space to do it – because their borrowing costs are high.

They are being asked to solve a problem they did not necessarily create, using resources that the problem itself is consuming.

The intervention that fits

Multilateral institutions, including the United Nations and multilateral development banks, cannot change what credit rating agencies do inside their own methodologies. Assessments are made independently. Interfering with the way they do it would undermine that independence.

Recent evidence in the multilateral development bank system shows that coordination is the prerequisite to movement.

Coordination across multilateral development banks and their shareholders led first to the creation of an emerging markets credit risk database, then to the formal review of multilateral development bank lending by an expert panel appointed during Indonesia’s presidency of the G20, and then to major credit rating agencies changing their methodological processes.

The infrastructure that makes governance reforms legible to credit markets is a public good. Public goods require public investment. This is not a call for a new institution. It is a reorientation of existing ones towards a gap that nobody is currently filling.

Every sovereign that has undertaken genuine reform and watched its credit conditions remain unchanged knows the problem this article describes. They are being assessed before a full appreciation of their credit worthiness is possible. Building the upstream infrastructure to close this gap is the multilateral system’s most important contribution to sovereign credit reform.

– Countries suffer when credit rating agencies lack data: how to fix the problem at source
– https://theconversation.com/countries-suffer-when-credit-rating-agencies-lack-data-how-to-fix-the-problem-at-source-279671

Africa’s top-ranked Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Training Partner launches 15th cohort of globally recognized sustainability reporting certification

Source: APO

Impact Africa Consulting Limited (IACL) (www.ImpactingAfrica.com), Africa’s top-ranked certified GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) training partner has announced the launch of its 15th cohort of the GRI Certification Training program. This intensive three-week virtual course is set to begin on 11th May 2026 and is open to professionals across Africa and the global diaspora seeking internationally recognized credentials in sustainability reporting.

Speaking during the announcement, the Lead Trainer and Global Sustainability Expert Dr. Edward Mungai said that The GRI Certification program combines rigorous technical instruction with practical, Africa-contextualized applications, enabling participants to design, implement, and interpret sustainability reports that meet global standards while reflecting local realities.

“Sustainability reporting is no longer a peripheral activity for African organizations,” Dr. Mungai added. “Investors, development finance institutions, and global supply chain partners are demanding transparent ESG data. Impact Africa’s GRI Certification program is a direct response to this demand. We are training the professionals who will produce those reports, lead those conversations, and position African organizations to compete on the global stage.”

The GRI Certification Training Program is accredited by The Global Reporting Initiative (www.GlobalReporting.org); The World’s most widely used sustainability reporting framework, applied by over 10,000 organizations across more than 100 countries. Participants who complete the program and pass the certification examination earn the globally recognized designation of GRI Certified Sustainability Practitioner.

Since its first cohort, IACL has trained hundreds of sustainability professionals across East Africa, West Africa, Southern Africa and beyond, building a growing community of GRI-certified practitioners driving transparent, accountable reporting from the continent.

Madikizela Otieno, a seasoned legal professional, encourages professionals across fields to take the certification. She explains that the program helped her pivot from traditional legal practice to ESG-focused legal advisory, enabling her to integrate sustainability into governance and operations. Through the training, she deepened her understanding of the GRI framework, discovered the strategic value of sustainability, and is now applying her expertise in real-world projects, including supporting a developer navigate carbon market policy across eight African countries. Her story highlights how the certification equips professionals to adopt a sustainability lens and unlock new opportunities in their careers.

The core learning outcomes for the certification program include developing a thorough understanding of the structure and application of GRI Standards for sustainability reporting, conducting materiality assessments and engaging stakeholders in meaningful ways, and designing and producing a GRI-compliant sustainability report from the ground up. Participants will also learn to interpret how sustainability reporting connects to and supports long-term organizational value.

Impact Africa Consulting expert trainers will deliver the program virtually through live training sessions. The program consists of five days of interactive coursework, three hours per day. It will further be supported by a two-week refresher course that includes five full-length mock examinations, case studies from African industries, and interactive group sessions. Participants are also set to receive unlimited access to course materials beyond the training period.

The 15th cohort is designed for sustainability analysts, ESG officers, corporate communications teams, external auditors, EHS managers, investor relations professionals, NGO program staff, government officials, consultants, and students pursuing careers in sustainability. Organizations sponsoring team members benefit from group enrolment arrangements and a unified reporting capability across their sustainability functions.

Applications are being received on a rolling basis until the class is full. The application form can be accessed via https://apo-opa.co/4tF3MQO

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Impact Africa Consulting Limited.

Media Enquiries:
Impact Africa
Email: contact@impactingafrica.com
Call/WhatsApp: +254 701201985

About Impact Africa Consulting Limited:
Impact Africa Consulting Limited is a leading development consulting firm headquartered in Nairobi, Kenya with regional offices in Lusaka, Abidjan, and Dakar. The firm specializes in sustainability and climate advisory, organizational capacity building, Enterprise support services, social sector and private sector development, Impact assessment and M&E and operates as a certified GRI training partner across Africa. The organization also offers a growing portfolio of professional development programs in sustainability, governance, health security, resource mobilization, and now the FSA® Credential preparation course, equipping financial professionals to integrate sustainability considerations into financial analysis

Impact Africa’s GRI training program has produced over 350 certified sustainability practitioners in sectors including financial services, manufacturing, floriculture, legal services, infrastructure, public sector, marketing, PR/communications and development, making it the most operationally diverse GRI training program in Africa.

Media files

.

Chambre africaine de l’énergie (AEC) intervient dans une affaire climatique historique pour défendre l’avenir énergétique de l’Afrique

Source: Africa Press Organisation – French


Chambre africaine de l’énergie (AEC) (www.EnergyChamber.org) a officiellement déposé sa demande d’admission en tant qu’amicus curiae dans une procédure consultative historique devant la Cour africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples, marquant ainsi une étape stratégique pour garantir que les priorités énergétiques de l’Afrique soient représentées dans une affaire aux implications considérables pour le continent.

Cette affaire, initiée par l’Union panafricaine des avocats, vise à clarifier les obligations juridiques des États africains en matière de lutte contre le changement climatique au regard des cadres régionaux des droits de l’homme. Si cette demande souligne la vulnérabilité de l’Afrique face aux impacts climatiques, elle soulève également des questions cruciales sur la manière dont ces obligations pourraient être interprétées dans la pratique – en particulier en ce qui concerne le développement énergétique, l’industrialisation et la croissance économique.

La demande invite la Cour à clarifier toute une série de questions, notamment les obligations des États de lutter contre les impacts climatiques, de protéger les populations vulnérables, de mettre en œuvre des mesures d’atténuation et d’adaptation, et de garantir la responsabilité dans les décisions relatives à la politique énergétique et au développement. L’engagement des États africains et des parties prenantes a été inégal, ce qui fait craindre que les résultats ne reflètent pas pleinement les priorités du continent.

Pour l’AEC, les enjeux sont considérables. À travers le continent, on s’inquiète de plus en plus du fait que les litiges et les actions de plaidoyer liés au climat – souvent financés ou guidés par des ONG étrangères – cherchent à bloquer le financement ou le développement de projets énergétiques africains. Parmi les exemples récents, on peut citer les poursuites judiciaires contestant le financement de l’oléoduc d’Afrique de l’Est, l’exploitation gazière au Mozambique par Total Energies et les litiges agressifs en Afrique du Sud visant l’exploration pétrolière et gazière. La Chambre estime que ce sont les voix africaines qui doivent mener le débat.

« Nous aurions préféré un dialogue mené par les Africains sur cette question », déclare NJ Ayuk, président exécutif de l’AEC. « L’Afrique ne doit pas être un acteur passif dans les décisions qui façonnent son avenir énergétique. Notre requête garantit que les voix des pays africains, de leurs industries et de leurs citoyens soient entendues. La politique climatique doit refléter non seulement les priorités environnementales, mais aussi le droit fondamental au développement et à l’accès à l’énergie. »

L’Afrique représente une faible part des émissions mondiales de gaz à effet de serre, mais reste la région la plus défavorisée en matière d’énergie au monde. Plus de 600 millions de personnes n’ont toujours pas accès à l’électricité, tandis que les solutions de cuisson propre restent hors de portée pour des centaines de millions d’autres. Dans ce contexte, l’AEC soutient que les ressources pétrolières et gazières continueront de jouer un rôle essentiel pour permettre l’industrialisation, la création d’emplois et la résilience économique.

À travers sa soumission, la Chambre vise à fournir à la Cour des informations sectorielles spécifiques sur l’intersection entre le changement climatique, les droits de l’homme et le développement énergétique. En particulier, l’AEC souligne l’importance d’une transition énergétique équilibrée et inclusive, intégrant les hydrocarbures aux côtés des solutions d’énergie renouvelable.

Cet avis consultatif s’inscrit dans une tendance mondiale plus large de contentieux liés au climat, renforçant la nécessité pour les institutions africaines de s’engager activement dans l’élaboration des cadres juridiques. Il est essentiel de veiller à ce que les perspectives et les priorités africaines soient au cœur de ces débats pour parvenir à des résultats justes, équitables et alignés sur les ambitions de développement du continent.

« En tant que continent, nous devons mener ce débat avec clarté et conviction », a ajouté M. Ayuk. « Les décisions prises aujourd’hui façonneront l’avenir énergétique de l’Afrique pour des générations. L’Afrique mérite un cadre qui protège son droit au développement, garantisse l’accès à l’énergie et relève les défis climatiques de manière juste et pragmatique – sans influence indue d’acteurs étrangers ou d’ONG. »

L’engagement de la Chambre marque le début d’un effort plus large visant à informer, mobiliser et aligner les parties prenantes à travers le continent, contribuant ainsi à préserver le droit de l’Afrique à développer ses ressources énergétiques de manière responsable et durable.

Distribué par APO Group pour African Energy Chamber.